Although it is nice to see the gatekeepers of ethics squirm
We live in a snippet world where rapid fire images/headlines and sound bytes shape public opinion - not facts
Partisan hacks on all sides exploit these for their parties benefit and reproduce favourable snippets ad nauseum in as many mediums as possible . Sad whentwo gentleman of impeccable ethics, Cadman and Goodale, are smeared by hacks on opposing sides without regard to their service or records
Back to polls, we also frequently believe and cite media and polls regardles of their obvious RW(Post, Sun) or LW(Star) bent
This one may not reflect reality as question seems non-scientific and biased towards general mistrust of politicians - who would admit they believe a poiltican unless they were partisan to begin with - wouldn't that be admitting their naievete based on snippet conditioning ?