KO2

Caucasians? Some say that these are just Asians with cock....

I think my Oracle's hat is nicer than the Popes head gear. And there's plenty of white smoke around here. Hey, I'm going to crown myself "The First Free-Roaming Oracle of Modern times" Bud Oracle......... Just like the old Oracle of Delphi, I've got the resume of drug use, certainly have many far-out ideas, make great predictions. Think of what could happen if this got as big as the Olympics, another Ancient Greek tradition? Move over Pope Benedict... Raus mit dier... The Oracle, Bud's here.............

I don't think I'm a victim. You are trying to make me one, but I'm barely holding my own. Itis you doing all the labelling, the calling of names. I'm only pointing out the obvious. The truth doesn't sit well with you.

I'm sorry if you misinterpreted my post as being "angry." My post states why I believe this premise of protecting the Caucasian races is nothing but racist nonsense (and as such would have a better home on a racist site). I'll repost it below in case you missed it. ScottSA states that Caucasians are "destroying themselves as a homogenous race" I guess that there are two ways that you could rationalize that statement. First, by allowing people with darker skin to move into the "traditionally Caucasian nations" the white people will become a minority. I'm just left with one question, how does becoming a minority in a region affect race? Will being a descendant of white ancestors be affected if that group makes up the minority in a country? Do you foresee a genocide of white people in the future? Will the white people become the American Indians of the 22nd century? The second possible way Caucasians might be "destroying themselves" would come about from interbreeding, and a loss of purity. The original post contends that "every other racially homogenous region in the world asks these kinds of questions as a matter of course." Well, Canada is not now, and has never been racially homogenous. So, to answer the question posed in the initial post of this thread, I am not concerned about the loss of whiteness because all people are equal. If in several hundred years we have evolved into a homogenous shade of purple, I don't think the human race will be any worse off for it. To be honest, I think this thread would have a better home on the Stormfront forums. Hmmm....you know I think Scott has said over and over that he doesnt believe there is anything more than a "superficial" difference between people of different races. That's not the point. If someone says hey I would like to conserve white people so that they still exist it does not mean they think they are more important. I dont think Scott is talking about banning interracial marriages. He has not said anything to that effect. You know in the long run it doesnt matter if..... well...the baseball glove I had as a kid is still in a shoebox in my closet. But some people like to preserve stuff like that. You dont have to make it into a hate thing. If there were only 100 black people left and a few of em got together and said "you know i would like there to be black people in the future...i know its not important what color your skin is...but there always were black people as far as i remember...id like there to keep being black people."----would that be such a crime? Sure there are no pure whites....well lot people who wanna marry what they consider white people marry them. What is the big deal. If a person decides to choose a woman who is white, according to your logic you should have no problem with it....since there is no difference between white. black, brown anyway...and the white race doesnt even exist...well he is really just marrying a really pale black woman,. Yeesh And you call me a know it alll. You prove everything I say about you. Didn't I just tell you that whatever someone calls you is what they feel about themselves.

Yes I have done all you recounted and learned much from it. As I helped pioneer the sport of hang gliding in this country I have some valid perspective which you are free to criticize all you want. The reason I like to share my wisdom as I have exoerienced it is in the spirit of growing a pool of knowledge . This is how we early flexwing pilots expanded the sport from hundred foot hops to 350 mile magical mystery tours. I'm rightfull proud of my honest learning experiences all of which I claim to be in the public domain are to be found there after searching. My sharing here was done so everyone could gain. I didn't want to end up being the only contributer of positive inputs, but if youi are not capable wear the shoe that fits. My spirit would suffer if I were to be as mean and spitefully negative as you. There is not a single lesson from your lives, a true personal insight into the challenges we are dicussing here, available for me to gain knowledge from. Your constant plan of attack is to belittle me, as if you wished to capture my goat. This anyone can see is the power of your god. My goat aint coming to you. It is not I that needs to forgive you, that's your god's job-remember, I'm only an Oracle. We are not in the forgiving business. We like virgins, various fun substances and then we make predictions. By the way you fling your christian love at me, I understand why there are real problems in the world today Amen to you, too.

I gues I forgot to say something. Jury duty can't be fun Who's got tricadecaphobia now?

Conrad paid more taxes in a year than you will your whole life. Without people like Conrad, our economy would be non-existant. Only a true fool would condemn someone to jail solely on their personality. Apparently, that's what happened with this trial. You can't be serious. He was convicted of self-dealing, not of having a personality. If CEO's can get away with stealing from shareholders, the whole system of capital markets would be at risk. Business leaders who breach the trust placed in them have no place in this system. The interesting question now is whether the Conservative government in Canada will find some way to let this non-citizen convict return to Canada in violation of immigration laws.

Judge Howard Borenstein is a judge in the provincial court. I guess, ScottSA, like Conrad, you might consider how valid is it to have tricadecaphobia?

No one have any constructive/ destructive input? I'm kind of "up for it" having tried out the "Chronic" Make my evening! Do you feel lucky?

I told my kids that rather than be afraid or prejudiced of "Coloured People" they should think of marrying one, so that we of the strawberry blond and fair complexion might have offspring with more melanim? in the skin. Survival of the fittest. Generational protection for my offspring as our ozone layer depletes. I'm proud to say my son took me up on my wisdom. I have two lovely grandchildren who don't appear as if they will need to worry about skin cancer. My motto from genetics is; the bigger the gene pool, the better the mix.

"The 29-year-old Toronto resident had been charged with possession of about 3.5 grams or roughly $45 dollars worth of marijuana." We have a better consumer position here. I paid $22.50 for an eigth.

You can always tell a fundamentalist by the uninteresting drivel and poor lies they tell you. Always willing to engage the lowest tactics like our PM, doughnut munching, Fat F*** that he is. Ready to lie and deny, quick to insult and denegrate, Christians are easy to spot. They are always snared by the words of their mouths, keyboard.

Hey ScottsA, What is it? In this forum you sound Religious and in the other forum you claim to be non religious. Did I snag you with the story of Peter denying Christ # times before the Cock crowed, or what? The surest way to judge the vine of Christ is the fruit it bares, eh! So far it is almost as if I were an Oracle the way I had you pegged for a closet Chritians in my conversation. Didn't I say that Fraud is born of Fraud? Please don't pray for me, I want nothing to do with the God of deception. Amen

"Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Kim Jong Il, Che. If there's a hell, I bet they're still tortured." Do you ever have anything positive, or even to the point, to say from your healthy, balanced, sober perspective? Or is it safe to assume that your vaunted sober perspective produces such mediocrity? Or is such drivel the product of alcohol?

Just a thought that I figured might get a rise. I just scored some nice pot in The Commercial drive area. As the bags of "Chronic" and "Kush" openly changed hand 3 cops were doing a roust/walk through hassling several unluckier dealers less than 50 metres away. They were all clean but the cops wer kept busy checking them out. In the three minutes that I waited for my turn, nearly five hundred dollars exchanged hands. The whole thing was a metaphor for the "Harper Vice Squad Surge," a totally futile viscous problem, like trying to pick up Mercury. Or like: When I was dreaming of being the Red Baron as the mastery of powered flight came to me in the Kasperwing, I had an experience wich is the basis of a memory of significance that always returns to me at time like this. I had been eye"ing" a flock of perhaps 2000 sheep as I practiced approaches, landings and takeoffs from a huge sod farm, near Wetaskawin, AB. ( Yeah I was Toking up) One day I couldn't fight back the urges to buzz them. Boy was it fun!!!! As I got braver and dropped down to within a few feet of them, from a long shallow dive. Holding extra speed over them for safety, they reminded me of airiel footage I had seen of herds of wildabeasts in Africa. The lesson that I'll never forget was that as I "strafed" them, they behave like a fluid. A corridor, the width of my wingspan would open up with the whole herd splitting into two. Each side would curl back around in stampeding animals, as a fluid would, and fill in the freslhly opened corridor again, from behind, in a few seconds. The animals appeared to curl like water in a stampeding coordinated coriographed motion, filing in the void left by my disturbance. The new "Harper vice squad" approach is trying to pick up quicksilver by chasing the dealers around the park. It's exactly like trying to seperate a large herd of sheep into two smaller herds using a little aircraft. Can't be done. Sheep will be sheep and humans will be humans, Bible stories and moral judgement notwithstanding,

Too bad because I was really interested as to what you mean by it. I don't think smoking anotherone will help because your writing will remain inscrutible. It clearly reefers to watching much TV for your information but then its concliusions are vague. I think that you don't remember why these words were significant to you anymore, or, They are gibberish, the thoughts of a self deluded expert on everyone else.........

you really like pitting yourself against me, don't you? I didn't really understand all that bu7t its sounds OK to me. Like the stuff at the bottom of your post. I guess I'm just too slow to understand it all, Can you explain it to me, please?

OK........................................?

Wow, you love to engage me in verbal combat, Sir. I must have your goat. It is very apparent to anyone who reads this forum what value that they should put on the effects of chronic marijuana use as compared to complete abstinence. You refer to my judgement being irrelevant because of my use of marijuana. I'm confident as to the value of my reasoned approaches to any problem in which I claim to have some expertise, will stand on their own and be favourably judged by intelligent readers. Your insults, unfounded flawed reasoning, scattered ranting, will also speak for itself. Unlike you of me, I'll let others judge you, and by deduction, the truly beneficial results of chronic marijuana use.

Yeah I am an expert in the military, at least as much a one as you and the soldier. What would you know of our comparitive research into these areas, to infer that I would be any less of an expert in this forum than anyone else? Because the guy humps equipment into a remote area his expertise trumps mine? Yeah, I'm proud that I'm an expert at least a far as an amature(associate degree in then environmental field,) and many other things that you don't even understand exist as well as, marijuana, LSD, political science. I'm a well read man with a voracious appetite for knowledge of an ecclectic expanse. The insults don't do much for you except lower your value in the eyes of people who will read us. Again I say unto you, ye are snared by the words of your mouths.

You people seem to think that because someone works as a fireman they can plan building fire safety, A garbagge collector would automaticaly make the best planner of Environmental policies. (I know you'll complain vehemently to that one and insult me further) A year before the idiot to the south walked into his debacle, I argued passionately with a retired major of the Canadian forces that it would be a tragedy for the western world. I state that they would loose and loose badly. I stated that thety would loose their position of world leadership and become weak militarily. I stated that our safety in Canada would be directly affected. This man, the Major, laughed at me and claimed that because an operations officer, an expert in computers/ strategic warfare, and because he was intimately aware of the American's military capabilities that victory was forseen. and I was a dumb stoner. So, I said all kinds of things about how dangerous the world would become if the middle east became unstable. I'll probably never collect my loonie bet from this military expert.

His one liners are shiny with truth. His technique is flawless with an arrow to the heart of the matter. He snares them with their own words-- a biblical truth I wish I could be so accurate, yet stingy, with words myself. His words sure got a rise out of you, didn't they? By the way, I have tried to understand many things including having three complete studies of the bible. I love the human wisdom of it, but see the fraud in the marketing of it as the word of god. Not long ago, a person who felt like searching elsewhere, or making such statements as I have made here, would suffer a very painful screaming death. Christians should not be so selective when the embrace there past, skipping over some of their relatively recent history. Was god with your fellow good brethern when the screams of burning whiches rang out? Oh, what fun those traditions and rituals must have been for some of the local clergy. Unlike yesterday's haven for pedophiles, the Holy church might have been a respit for peversions of a different sort a century before. My voice boldly ringing forth today might be the call from former torture victims for revenge against the timeless idiocy of Religion. Does KO2 have the mark of the beast upon him for daring to pose these irreverant thoughts?

I asked for your answers to these questions and observations. I knew someone would disagree here in this forum, but lets not have summary dismissals without any logical positions to those observations. I'm saying that anyone that has a complex story of the entire universe, supreme beings and all, that's so simplisticly reduced to fit in one book, which we can never add a thing to, even after 4000 years of history. lets just test it with a couple of questions. The bible claims thal all knowledge required by man is within it. And you are saying that I'm simplistic. Get a grip on reality, please. Don't just fly off the handle and insult me personally, because you disagree with me. And quit saying that you are not religious, no one without a stake in this would dissmiss me so quickly by decreeing I'm too simplistic or be so vehemently insulting. The religious are capable of self deception, and will quickly resort to fraud; even as Peter denied the Lord three times before the cock crowed.

"Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries. But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again." This is a reason we should develop, or modify foreign policy on? I don't don't quite follow your meaning here. Is it reasonable to make any kind of foreign policy on such over simplification? The world is not a dance hall and when we are on military missions we are not dancing. How sweet such metaphores to cover up the tragic reality of the remains the parents of those dance-partners actually recieve back after the dance is through

You don't honestly see that the effect of the military always promoting itself on mass media with our tax dollars does't directly garner support for the Government's foreign policy? Where is my equal time on the National Media, to promote my view on the taxpayer's buck? Where are my concerns linked to such solomn rituals as funerals, noble traditions, while displays of success of the smallest consequences are given much spin. And just what does all this foo fer rah have too do with why we are there in the first place. When so many vague reasons are given for anything to me, bolstered by persuasion from those whose idea all this was in the first place, something doesn't add up for me. Its all affective Marketing for a purpose. The reason the marketing is so great a component is because the real reason we are there is unmentionable. That is why there is so much selling going on. If the reason for this mission was noble, Caanadians would be smart enough to grasp it with out the marketing. The reason we are not in favour of this war is because a majority of Cnadians arebeing told by their gut feelings that it is wrong, despite the great effort to sell it. Personally I see it as an extension of American military foreign policy , the requirenments of our duty having been fulfilled long ago. The Bovine reference is an analogy of the American society to a large herd of cows all munching the fodder of their government fulfilling their role as unthinking tax beasts, supporting a military dictatorship. It would be hard to understand this from the short statement I gave. I'm glad you asked me to clarify it. Don't get me wrong I respect you for your service to me. I'm not sure though that you should sit at the table in the decission to use your services. Like politicians who have a personal interest in an issue must excuse themselves from the vote. I am sure that you should not be given unbalanced airtime to promote your views to Canadians. You have no clue of the power of the Media? Thanks for the intelligent conversation, I'm glad our soldiers are so articulate.