xul

Star Wars are also wars which war enthusiasts always want. It is why each of these movie was able to sell tickets of 1 to 2 billion $. Lots of war fans out there

August1991 implied that Canadian boys joined army in ww2 just for some good reason like promoting democracy, freedom or righteousness.....they hadn't a drop of war enthusiast blood in their veins. So I asked him what those French and English soldiers fought for in the Seven Years War? Obviously you can not find a party of the war to play bad guy like Nazi in WW2, and without a bad guy logically there were also no good guys in the war. Still on both side there were soldiers who joined the war for believing they fought for righteousness. If the souls of the dead in the war were watching the present world, they would feel their sacrifice meaningless because old countrymen had betrayed their country and old enemy had become their new countrymen. The righteousness (for king and country stuff?) which they once put faith in is just void. We have to admit, human beings have these wars because they have war enthusiast gene in their blood. Righteousness is just their excuse to do what they want to do. So no need to be shame of being a war enthusiast. This is my point.

If you had ever considered what millions of German and Japanese soldiers died for during WW2, in France, Russia, China, the bottom of the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean....far away from their homeland, you would not think I was so stupid. To those French and English soldiers who died in the Seven Years' War in North America, what did they die for? For political correctness? LOL, it seems like there were at least two versions of political correctness then.(Please forgive me not mentioning Spanish, Aboriginal and other parties.) Even if some of them truly died for this reason, when their souls are watching present Canada or America from heaven, they would find they had put their faith on false political gods then and the true value of their death is merely to inspire Hollywood film makers to make movies like Pirates of Caribbean to make billions $ GDP.

Initially, when I was conceiving the plot of the video, it was just a joke to make fun of the event. I gave President Trump the role no more or less than a jester or a clown. The video was supposed to end up at President Trump in his rage because Island Binomo disappeared. But when I began to seek ingredients of the video, I mean the video clips to fit the plot, I watched some Trump's speeches and I think he had, partially, convinced me on the fake news part. So I decided to give President Trump a more positive role in the video, to put some political meaning to the video, by using Trump's "fake news speech" at the ending. Fake news is more harmful to a nation than its president used to put his hands on women's butts. A joke for example: Army Guy has eventually got the F-35 which he has been ranting on for years. So I guess your fanboys and fangirls of wars all will want him to fly the plane to Afghanistan this afternoon to to win the unwinnable war. But, unfortunately, the plane is a secondhand one which is bought from Kijiji because the Canadian Liberal PM has hacked off some of its budget to build a luxurious refugee camp----you know that every time when these F-16s, CF-18s and now F-35s rolls out to bomb something, the refugees will come in sooner or later. So, the F-35 which Army Guy is meant to fly, has a defective radar and datalink which always give the pilot false information like, if enemy is in the east the radar display will show it is on the west. Would you expect Army Guy to shoot down an old MiG-23 by this F-35?

Watch my video. 100% satisfaction guarantee----Nuclear War awaits

I once asked BC2004 if she wanted to fly with pilot Trump on the B-52, with the attached video below and she gave me a reply Yes. I think she was either very brave or just not knowing what the video was. If you google 1994 Fairchild Air Force Base B-52 crash you will find that none co-pilots wanted to fly with the pilot because he used to fly the plane by very dangerous ways. The plane was the same plane model which had been flying safely over half a century. The rules and safety measures were the same rules which applied to all planes. The only variable was the pilots----some of them handled the machine with caution and never push it to the verge of its safety margin, some of them didn't. When the later miscalculated their winning chance of gambling, they crashed and killed themselves, usually alone with others. Big things usually have small beginnings. A nuclear war won't happen all of sudden without any prologue and escalating sequence. Just like the pilot didn't crash a B-52 on the first day he flew it. He just pushed the safety margin a bit, then nothing happened. Then he pushed it again other day, still nothing happened. So he did these so on and so forth, until his end push. If both Britain and Germany had nuke in 1930s, could you assume Hitler would not annex Austria, Czechoslovakia and then invade Poland? Or assume Britain and France would not declare war upon Germany just because Hitler had nuke? If Hitler planned to take Britain, France and Soviet by one operation, I'm sure nuke would deter him. But if he was just like the pilot in the video, he pushed a bit, nothing happened; then he push again....and again....until a total war which may lead to use nuke.

Maybe Canadian Liberal Party should create a new law to ban Trumpophobia in Canada in the first place... As for President Trump: Did Hitler start WW2? The answer is Yes. Did he meant to start WW2? My answer is he probably not. He probably thought the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact would deter the UK and France to declare war upon Germany when he invaded Poland. A big mistake. People do commit mistakes. But if it happens on a leader of a great power, the consequence may be severe. Millions of life will be lost because of a single miscalculation.

Don't worry. Let me link the two rails together and get the train back to its course. It seems like our American friend BC2004, knows neither her weapon nor her enemies when she plans these nuke wars above. The nuke, was created as a weapon to deal with the targets like hot war enemy Nazi Germany and Japan, or the cold war enemy Soviet Union, which USA could geographically separate and economically distinguish from itself. But nowadays who is USA's enemy? The No.1 of the list, I think BC2004 would say: China!----That's.....almost correct except her beloved president doesn't use the word but instead of the "rival". The president is correct because either in hot war or in cold war, you don't trade with your enemies, at least not on the same scale as USA with China. So nuke has far less effect on China than old Soviet Union because the both economies are entangled so deep that neither of them could destroy other without hurt its own economy badly. At this point, BC2004's Canadian ally, Conservative Dude would say: damn it! Maybe we should nuke these Islamic shitholes first, then we will turn around to deal with Russia and China. This was President Bush's old strategy which had been proved not working. The cause is as same as China---most Islamic countries in the world are politically, economically and even geographically(I mean US military base) entangled with the USA, so BC2004 can't nuke them all. Now Conservative Dude's twin sister, Liberal Girl comes out: xul, you are right. It's shame that conservatives like my brother's Islamophobia has turned Muslim to our enemy, and our beloved Liberal Fuhrer Tridude is taking action to protect Muslim... I'm afraid that Liberal Girl is also wrong. Firstly, fighting an enemy which doesn't exist isn't called action but acting. Look the video below, those "soldiers" are not soldiers but actors, because the enemy-----an almighty robotic alien----only exists in the film maker's imagination. Does Islamophobia exist in Canada so widely that Canada government or lawmakers need to create some new law or move specified to protect Muslim? I don't think so. There were a few incidents and none of them couldn't be settled under current legislation. The liberals don't know they are the one who are creating Islamophobia national wide. Politics is just like a swing, it has a balance point, but if you force it off the point, it will try to get back. And not only back, but it will go further to the opposite direction. This is what has been happening in USA. When a swing begins to move back and forth, it can hardly be stopped by those riders who are on it. Then some riders who are so scared may wish BC2004 nuke the swing to release them from fear---if you don't exist, you don't need to fear anything----but BC2004 may not help because she probably is busying to nuke-help scared kids on her own swing....

When I posted the 2 posts above, actually I hadn't seen the girl talking on TV or on web video yet and I didn't believe any conspiracy theory then. In my imagination, before the media reporters，the girl should be frightened for knowing her little trick is getting out of her hands. But in this video, she was just telling the lies like a....true politician. Hardly believe an 11 year-old could do this without any coaching and rehearsal. I'm really shocked. After watching this, the first thing coming in my mind is this actor line of this Barbie movie

You sounds like you used to post here just for making yourself feel better, or the organization which you support looks better than it really does, so you assume other posters post here by the same way As for me, I used to discuss things with academic manner, which means I focus on fact and logic rather than which group or faction I'm supposed to belong to. I do feel sorrow for the girl and her family. Yes, the girl lied. It is her fault. But without those politicians, would-be Muslim rights activists and, as you have pointed, the media...too eagerly and immaturely amplifying the lie to advance their own political agenda, what would happen? If the incident went down normal or usual way: 1) The girl somehow lied to her parents or teachers, 2) then the parents or teachers reported to police, 3) then police investigatd and found its a lie, 4) then parents and teachers educated the girl why what she did was wrong... Isn't it some kind of happy ending to the girl's mistake? I read some posts here that the girl's family apologized to "every Canadian". Without those amplifiers, why should they apologize to every Canadian since most Canadian except a few teachers and police offices even have no chance to know the incident? It is those amplifiers who should apologize to every Canadian. And these guys just shrug off as if they have never been in it?

I'm afraid that politicians should be blamed at first place over this matter. Making a joke for example: Polish Prime Minister: ...a few minutes ago, Russia has nuked a Polish colony in the South China Sea, Binomo. Do you know Binomo, Mr President? President Trump: We are aware the situation. I have ordered a nuke counterattack on Russia to defense our Polish ally.... CNN Live: ...President Trump has just ordered to launch nuke on Russia. Has he just started WW3...?(the broadcast stopped abruptly, so we all know the answer ) When the radioactive dust settles down, Polish Prime Minister@Real Polish PM: Fake news. I didn't call President Trump. We all know that Poland is a country without colonial history, and there isn't a Polish colony in the South China Sea. The phone call must be a prank... In the story above, President Trump should be fully responsible for the destruction of his country because as a national leader, not like the rest of us, he has ways to confirm what he hears from a phone call or TV before going into acting hastily. The same logic goes to Canadian Prime Minister and politicians as well.

What would President Trump do to deal with this Binomo crisis? Or what would American people do to deal with this idiocracy crisis?

Sometimes, the way you do a thing matters more than the thing itself. For example: Hugh Hefner or Harvey Weinstein, who got more women on his bed? I suppose the answer is Hugh Hefner. But why is Harvey Weinstein disgraced, not Hugh Hefner? Because Hefner was President Trump's supporter LOL, I'm joking. It is because the way how Harvey Weinstein got these women on his bed.

I remember once Taiwan president commented on China: How can China be great? It's just big... so is USA Besides, other great powers then were busy on competing supremacy in Europe, so they didn't have chance to use America's weakest moment for their gain. If Americans were in civil war now, I bet Putin would willingly hand out weapons on both side, free of charge... And to American's credit, after the war, both side compromised a lot to heal the wound of the war. General Lee's temple hadn't been blasted for over 150 years...until President Trump was elected and the nation was teared apart again.

It is very true indeed and it is why what Trump is doing is very dangerous. Obama blasted Bush's temple, so Trump blasted Obama's temple; Then Obama The 2nd blasted Trump's temple, then Trump The 2nd blasted Obama 2nd's temple; Then there will be Obama The 3rd and Trump The 3rd to do the same thing; Then USA will soon become a country like Iraq where people used to blast other's temple each other instead of seating down to talk and compromise to settle their argument.

Mikhail Gorbachev broke more old communist system than Deng Xiao Ping did, but not like Deng and his successors, Gorbachev failed to build a new one instead. Then he fell along with the Soviet Union

I would agree with you if you stated "President Trump would be one of the greatest ever if he could reverse something..." I remember you put your faith in President Bush, but he didn't save the day. Then you put your faith in President Obama, but he also didn't save the day. Now you put your faith in President Trump, I'm sure that he will fail you and his voters. Trump is an American president, not the dictator of China Deng Xiao Ping, so he can't force any reform on Americans by tanks like what Deng Xiao Ping did to Chinese in 1989. To perform such kind of reform, Trump need to do what all the greatest presidents before him did during their days: Trump needs to persuade the majority of American people, but he charisma ends up at extreme right wingers. Trump needs to co-operate and compromise with other political leaders, include opposite leaders, but from his behavior, it seems like he hasn't realized that the election is over. Trump needs more Made in America to make America great again, but what we have read from papers and TVs are President Trump targets F-35, President Trump targets Air Force One, President Trump, LOL, President Trump's fans target J-Law.....All of these targets are Made of America. It seems like the only American brand President Trump in favour of is Ivanka, which is Made in China, you know.... As a military personal, I suppose you know that if you want to win a war or battle, you not only need to set a target, but also need a feasible plan, which President Trump has none, and above all, a qualified commander, which President Trump...if Trump was a pilot, would you want to aboard a B-52 flying with him?

The titile is from a comment of the video: Sexual harasser and victim present award to known sexual harasser and alleged rapist President Bill Clinton. I have to admit that this time Trump's fans hit the spot. Maybe somebody thinks it isn't related to politics. But let's count: President Clinton, President Bush, President Obama, President Trump.. If you went to the worst block in your city and randomly select 100 adult male pedestrians to investigate, how much chance could you have to get 50 of the 100 as sexual harassers?

After the Battle of Moscow, almost till to the end of the war, Hitler's soldiers still managed to kill far more Russians than being killed by Russians. But if Hitler and his generals were wise, they would have figured out that the tide had already been moving against them.

From the link you posted, these are her original words: Lawrence only stated 2 things: 1. Americans continue to ignore the consequence of climate change by voting Trump. 2.By watching these hurricanes, she felt how much damage could be made by mother nature's rage and wrath. What's wrong with a comment like this? I can't see in where she blamed Trump for these hurricanes. For example, just assume J-Law was a German in 1930s: J-Law: It's also scary to know, that Hitler has stated that he will start wars and commit genocide against other nations, and German continues to ignore it by voting him to power; J-Law: By watching these footages of Nanjing Massacre, I can feel how far fascism will go in a war. Then, Hitler's stormtroopers begin to unleash the hurricane of burning J-Law's movies because Joseph Goebbels's tabloid told them that J-Law framed their beloved Fuhrer responsible for Nanjing Massacre... If J-Law was a German in 1930s, her movies would be burned like this by Fuhrer's fans

If I was a conservative politician and addressed my Canadian rancher voters like: "if you go into the washroom of a Liberal club, you will find out how many drug suckers there", I was not referring to the problem of the washroom or the club or even the drug suckers but the fault of Liberal Party. The shelves of Walmart are just the symbol of the fall of American manufacture industry. If somebody whose job makes him to access more complicated information, he will know the situation may be worse.

Honestly, I think the brains of most Americans had already shrunk to much before The Hunger Games novel/movie so they couldn't understand the true meaning of the story. You just go to a Walmart store and try to find anything which is made in America, you will know what I'm saying. In THG story, the ruler The Capitol eventually lost to the districts because it heavily depended on districts to sustain its living standard. The U.S., if you go into a Walmart store, you will find out that US is just as same as The Capitol in THG story.

Maybe the Hollywood's mental midget used to visit this forum and got the idea that President Trump could fix anything which even every other president before him had failed to fix, from Trump supporters' posts here of course . So she blamed Trump for the hurricanes because if he had the ability to stop the disasters but failed to act, why shouldn't he be blamed

For sake of the lives of those Indian soldiers, I wish she did have a plan and did not talk in sleep. Border stand-off with China can be resolved through talks: India China has clearly signalled India in last 24 hours: time is ticking. withdraw your troops or prepare to be forcefully withdrawn. Withdraw Troops From Doklam If You Cherish Peace: China Tells India In some Chinese military fan boy's forum, there is a joke: Indian government has given orders to its soldiers: If China begins to withdraw its soldier for preparing open fire, Indian soldiers should run back to Indian border (only 180m away from the site) immediately before Chinese could make enough distance for engagement. Then Indian government will declare that India has win the stand-off because China has withdrawn its troops first.

The incident happened at 2:30 am, so the visual might not be dependable. The photo shows that the deck of ACX Cystal was piled with containers which might block its radar beam, so its captain might not see USS Fitzgerald on its radar screen. Even if the capation had seen USS Fitzgerald, since it came from ACX Cystal port side (according the damage area on both ships), he would reasonably assume that USS Fitzgerald would yield to his ship's course. But what was the story of USS Fitzgerald? Hardly could believe that its radar couldn't find a 29000 ton cargo ship. So maybe this is a real version of the story of US Navy vs Lighthouse? US sailors missing after Navy destroyer collision off Japan