William Ashley

http://www.airshipstothearctic.com/ It is being handled by the US.. if Canada doesn't create its own product it will loose out on this market that has grand potential within Canada. http://www.isopolar.ca/ http://vanhorne.info/

The Harper Government is still planning an all season road into the North. It cost more than their new bomb shell casings for Libya http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2011/03/22/north-fed-budget-highway-reax.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuktoyaktuk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inuvik The distance is not great. It looks to be about 100-200km. Although the road price actually seems a little "low" compared to some road construction costs here in Ontario. The cost is surprising because it connects a village of about 1000 people (at a cost of 150 million dollars). I'm sure there is relevance (and rationalities even if not based in a sane reality) however I need to read more about the reasons why. That road would pay for 3+ of these airships. (although they are priced high) (the airships have an advantage because they can operate over the ocean and deliver things like stuff under 200 tons like parts of oil rigs or boats) - they can also land on ice. Think modular rigs www.iadc.org/dcpi/dc-septoct06/Sept06-polaris.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_exploration_in_the_Arctic http://in.reuters.com/video/2011/08/18/lockheed-martin-presents-airship-of-the?videoId=218454698

I was traveling back from Mexico to Canada at the time (not Canada to Mexico), it was the end of my trip not the beginning. Flights from LA were less likewise I would have saved if I took greyhound back as opposed to flying out from Tijuana where my trip ended and then to DF (Mexico City) then DF to Toronto direct. It cost less to go to Sandiego or then LA onward to Toronto. Arar was a completely different situation - even if potentially related. I don't find it funny.

YES BUT I DIDN'T WANT TO STAY, I WAS ONLY TRAVELING HOME FROM MEXICO! THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE! THEY WANT TO BE IN THE US. I JUST WANTED TO TRAVEL VIA THE US. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/somalia/8742413/Famine-spreads-with-750000-at-risk-of-death-in-Somalia-alone-UN-says.html This article raised another point in my mind.. IF YOU ARN'T GOING TO DONATE.. atleast buy their homes or trade with them property for food. Real estate even in a war torn country has some value.

http://www.canadianbusiness.com/article/43291--northern-aviator-signs-first-arctic-airship-deal The price for production was much higher than "my mass produced" plan to create "stealth detection / mobile air defence / transport of goods / search and rescue / communications relay, and a "air based pipeline" for methane gas production from northern peat swamps and bogs - to bottle mass swampgas type reserves for processing and use of methane and cycled down hydrogen (and use of carbon for nanocarbon production of a space elevator (and roll out of nanocarbon hybrid products) (all in one model) (use of nanocarbon products will extend product life, improving productive efficiency) None the less it is nice to see someone actually starting my plan - even though it doesn't seem to be a grand fleet and the production price is "way" higher than my model. - and it is generally only aimed at transport rather than communication / military / and search and rescue - firefighting etc.. I hope this brings down the cost of living in the north. (It will also be interesting to see how the US military deploys their model..) This is one example http://www.space.com/8615-army-orders-huge-airship-aid-combat-missions.html (where is bowser?) There is definite "interest" because of the homeland security intended usages... Here is a look at the company http://www.hybridairvehicles.com/ Take for instance israel... as with iron dome they could just build a huge transparent airship across the entire trajectory of rocket attacks with blow away plate shielding.. and have a defence.. the applications are many. 50 km is only 50000 meters. Or what about cloud9's - and Israel could settle the air instead of palestinian land Others can do MUCH more http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1317510/The-giant-Skylifter-airships-carry-buildings-hundreds-miles.html

Lets see 700 million plus "atleast 500 million is 1.3 Billion - atleast" http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/16/ottawa-commits-to-non-combat-role-in-afghanistan-after-2011/ Funny how suddenly 300 million and 700 million don't match up on the aid front? This in contrast to the $20 million for young entrepreneurs Providing $20 million over two years to help the Canadian Youth Business Foundation to support young entrepreneurs. 1.3+ billion to a country in central asia .. 20 million to Canadian Youth. The whole of public infrastructure investments over the NEXT 5 YEARS IN CANADA is LESS than foreign aid to Afghanistan FOR ONE YEAR Providing $228 million over three years to fund repairs and major maintenance to federal bridges in Greater Montréal. Investing $148 million over the next five years to maintain bridges, dams and other specialized federal assets managed by Public Works and Government Services Canada across Canada. Providing up to $72 million over three years for repairs to storm-damaged small craft harbours. Contributing $150 million toward the construction of an all-season road between Inuvik and Tuktoyaktuk that completes the Dempster Highway, connecting Canadians from coast to coast to coast. ------- How can the government legitimize funding central Asia when they are racking hundreds of billions dollars in debt in Canada each year with securities borrowing and deficit spending at markup.

Yeh but the suprise would be because they were letting someone vote.

And colonists lived off their labour what is the difference? You think Fur Trader's didn't make excess income from the work of the natives. You think that these days education on how to survive over here wouldn't get a nice teacher's salary. You are utterly ignorant in supposing that there is no legacy to the context of exchange, or means of a fair trade for equalization of grants. The OWNERSHIP of land beyond right grant by reason and god is utterly baseless and evil. Property likewise is hoardingselfishness - it is the grace of god and the land itself that provides all for humanity you ignorant prick. People live and breath and have what is provided. They can struggle or they can have peace in their life. It makes no difference - but humanity does owe life to one another less you are not in good spirit and position only represents of taint to evil deeds and intent. (there is the justification of reasonable use as well as personal affect - the extent of share resource in a monetary system is generally based on determination the print - which the government "gets free money" - but why is the "government" more important than any private body for rightful valuation - and why are the private parties that receive patronage from the government any more worthy of the free money? It should be based on need. And people directed by the government who are in need to reduce any burdens on the public itself, so those that are children in care should have choice to be children or equals in standing on their own. The government however owes a duty to ameliorate the want from all its people so long as the needs of the people are justified and good. That the limit of removing the hurt from society is only limited by the willingness of society to remove the hurt. "Give me what I want or I'll take it" that is the bottom line that is how government works and so that is the mirror ethical conduct to interact with government in - but always right and honourable rationality must be utilized in determining all needs as opposed to desires which are not required and cause harm to others - since wrong acts are only those that knowing harm others without the need to do so) Need to get this in before the possible ban... first off yeah native treaty rights should be brought into being but really treaties mean to be renegotiated... thing is though - CANADA people arn't concerned with "the law" because their law is basically take what you can get, and really it is only Swiss defence that can leverage native rights to equal protection and veto on use of land or resources. Saipan, Canada is getting all it has from them, I hope you get that. The framework is wrong, but in modern society stealing other peoples land by trickery, murder, and enslavement is not moral or good. Canada does not have a moral social position in which it can assert its own rights - without denying freedom, and Canada is founded on a principle as of 1982 of a free society, an equal society. If your justice makes slavery fundamental in a democratic society I am only open to being your master so as to emancipate and educate your lack of knowing what it takes to live a life that doesn't come back to haunt you. It is a hard lesson but if you support slavery you will suffer the worst of that, like support of any wrong, you will live the worst of it before being freed from unknowing. That is my beleif. The treaty stuff is pretty much set, but no the government is way out of bounds. Perpetual binding is not legal beyond the generation of supposition - although the problem exists with the non reaffirmation of treaties which should be mandatory by government or chief. The idea of perpetuity is problematic legally because contract is not legal without being with informed consent and people who were not alive at the time of a contract cannot have informed consent. It is martial or political. Land rights are problematic especially in a Canadian context because of migration and war from 1600 onward (and before to a certain extent). There are breaches of law in the crown treaties as such many are void.

2B was more than the 1.5 in the link.. the price seems to have adjusted, what yeara was the amount 2B or more?

It isn't too expensive. You just need to get it from where it will hurt the least. For instance my system cycles down based on $10000 thresholds. (People can live on $10,000, they can live ok on $20,000, an individual on $30,000 should be able to live a nice lifestyle. 40/50/60k you are getting into family / dependent / drug habit /addiction territory --- this system then has $10,000 increases on cycle share for poverty reduction initiatives. The tax system only addresses poverty and essential services -- as the basic role that public fees should defaultively exist on.. everything else should be a service people can opt for. Funds to put to work 3 Million Canadians runs at about 75 Billion dollars. But in turn it creates productivity. The voodoo is very simple. Either people consume and do not contribute or they consume and they produce. Goods cost does not reflect the labour to produce them. Something costing $500 may only have a $20 input. The costs are relative. In order to give private entities the option contra the government to "just take the money from the public/private to insure training and utilization of human resources, it gives companies an option to take a portion of allocated funds for job start ups. Provided they insure that individuals contribute meaning that $20,000 on a salary of upward of $30,000. Meaning the private entity gets up to 66% of those funds from tax deductions. The US only offers a 6.2% payroll incentive http://tinyurl.com/yaz4akc These incentives in my program would come on a first come first serve basis for amounts exceeding the debt paydown quota. So they would be available as much as extra funds exist to meet the debt repayment schedule on the 15 year timeframe. Awards would be done on a day by day basis awarding job starts to companies from those startup funds on a split capita ratio of the companies on the share of debt repayment fees they pay. Private Entity pays more they have more starts available. Private Entities can transfer their start deduction to another party. This number is done on an annual basis and would redistribute unused start deductions at the end of each month reassigning starts - so they have to use it or they loose it (or it gets reduced). The debt paydown quota is an amount that varies year on year to insure debt repayment within 15 years. The actual amount paid is the amount of debt interest + any extra funds to pay down the debt (this comes from people who pay down their own personal portion of the public debt, or those who help others pay down their potion of the public debt). Corporate entities in turn pay a mirror of the amount the public paid - at minimum the debt interst amount that would be applied directly to paying down the debt. Extra funds would be a floating point but deductions would be provided from this amount. The debt interest amount also reduces by about 6.7% each year at minimum - but could be much larger initially meaning base corporate taxes would reduce by just under 7% of their value each year - so 7% of 15% year on year. or about 1% each year. In reality it could be more than 1%. Unlike the Harper government these moves would not result in debt increase or deficit. I don't think people want a command economy - I think people need a strong mixed economy, that insures the best productivity, lowest taxes, and freest government and people - one without debts, and obligations to private entities. The Social Goals are: -REMOVAL OF FEDERAL INCOME TAX, AND REMOVAL OF THE FEDERAL DEBT WITHIN 15 YEARS -THE RIGHT TO WORK FOR ALL, AND A FREE EDUCATION FOR CITIZENS -A PRIVATE MEDICAL SYSTEM BOTH THE POOR HAVE FREE ACCESS TO AND THE RICH HAVE NO NEED TO BECOME POOR TO HAVE ACCESS - A SECURE NATIONAL COMPUTING NETWORK FOR BUSINESS, COMMUNICATION AND GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES - NO NEED TO HAVE A PRIVATE BANK ACCOUNT - NO NEED TO FILE TAXES - SECURE NEIGHBORHOODS, WHILE EMPOWERING THE PEOPLE - A PEOPLE'S ASSEMBLY TO FORM A DIRECT FEEDBACK AND ADVISORY WHERE EVERY CITIZEN HAS A VOTE ON EVERY ISSUE. - A SIMPLIFIED JUSTICE SYSTEM, AND THE OPTION OF PRODUCTIVE PENAL TIME - THE REMOVAL OF POVERTY - A CLEANER AND MORE RESOURCEFUL NATION - SOCIAL EQUALITY, AND SOCIAL JUSTICE.

It isn't too expensive. You just need to get it from where it will hurt the least. For instance my system cycles down based on $10000 thresholds. Funds to put to work 3 Million Canadians runs at about 75 Billion dollars. But in turn it creates productivity. The voodoo is very simple. Either people consume and do not contribute or they consume and they produce. Goods cost does not reflect the labour to produce them. Something costing $500 may only have a $20 input. The costs are relative. In order to give private entities the option contra the government to "just take the money from the public/private to insure training and utilization of human resources, it gives companies an option to take a portion of allocated funds for job start ups. Provided they insure that individuals contribute meaning that $20,000 on a salary of upward of $30,000. Meaning the private entity gets up to 66% of those funds from tax deductions.

I'm thinking he did, the judge would have to be nuts to ship the guy to Somolia but that was one possible scenario-- actually that was what he had to appear to "stop" from happening. (You live most of your life in a country and don't have the cash to become a US citizen its a little backward if since you were a kid, you went to school graduated in the US, and still you get sent back to the third world while your parents and siblings are all US citizens you grew up with, all because you didn't pay for a piece of paper confirming it, you pledge to the flag and all that shit and still its not the same because of a bill and a piece of paper--- I guess that is how the US works right, its more than a bill and a piece of paper I suppose but why deprive naturalization from the poor? There were a lot of lifelong American's in there. I can't really say the full story but apparently only some Felonies can get you booted in that scenario. However it was really surprising to see people all getting shipped home. It was actually really suprising. Most thought they would beat the rap... but it is basically "Extra jail time" for non citizens is how it worked. You go to prison then you get extra time in jail from ICE and have to go through the courts a hundreds of dollars a day to the tax payer. The system is absolute madness. The fact the US also paid my bills when I entered with the intent to get a bus or plane home -- only to be held for a LONG time on the tax payer dime just shows how it is all backward.. but apparently it is good for a debt ridden state like California because the Federal government transfers money in to the state to do it for the facilities and facility staff etc... My forced stay I'm geussing cost the US taxpayer $6000-$10000 --- this while facilities are "overflowing" and they have people lined up in military barracks because there arn't enough facilities for ice detentions... it could be designed but they seem to purposely want to stuff the system - make up false stories without evidence, and prevent access to the courts for remedy for as long as they can. It is one of the aspects of the US that truly disgusts me. I won't go into great detail --- but I don't think most people want to end up in Israel. There is also the "crime rule" my memory doesn't serve me exactly on how it works but apparently you do certain types of crimes and you are rumped out. Apparently gun charges "can" be this type but not all. Need to find the legislation. A lot of this stuff was the reason for deporting "the Americans" (They were essentially American as far as I could tell but due to not being born in the US even if living their life in the US were still susceptible to deportation http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/155/ Its this same type of BS that has me "banned from the US" because a CBP officer thought I wanted to live in California and collect pogey (even though it was impossible to do so as far as I can tell, although they later may have forced me to stay in Otay for months and have now said next time it is 10 years if I show up again). Even though I have never had the intent to do such, because that CBP officer says they think that.. I am unable to go to the US. It is total bs. It is abuse. It all derives from that, but the gun people even if they had a criminal history and were connected with crime etc.. were generally nice people. --- Now it could all have been set up because some of the stories were unreal, but it is really quite sad what is going on with them. It was sad for me because I was held for a long time while we all officially wanted me to go to Canada - but the red tape delayed things, and they abused the red tape to hold me for many many weeks. Some of them are there for a hell of a lot longer just to present their cases, and in some cases are essentially no risk to be in the public. Like years just fighting extradition, some people choose not to fight the abuse simply because doing so would have them in jail while doing it. I had no intent of staying in the US, but I was even warned they would process me for application for refugee status, if I said the wrong thing. It is possible but I feel less secure in the US than Canada, and I don't feel secure in Canada. They totally abuse the process. It is not right if a casual traveler gets abducted and they force the person to stay in the country just to clear their name for made up lies. It is just plain ugly. I wouldn't have an issue if it were true. Back to the story though, I'd be really surprised if the guy got shipped to Somalia - it was just a side story when there were bands of Somalis getting refugee status - who broke the law to get into America, while they were shipping out someone who lived their life in America, only to break the law, and get sent away. But this is about Somalia. TRAC http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/158/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggravated_felony They put some guy who was just traveling in with people with felony charges for firearms offenses and drug trafficking?? amongst other things You think maybe they could seperate the people coming out of prison/jail being streamed for ICE issues, from people taken in at the border for non entry clearance without any criminal related offence. Like legally try to enter the US (because it lays between Mexico and Canada) get denied because someone made up a story about you but then get connected with armed cartel criminals, gang members, drug traffickers and coyotes. huh? Something isn't right in this. It is like a ponzi scheme to spike my RICO.

And that is part of the problem. When I was held in Otay Mesa, actually there were a lot of Somalians there. Their journey was actually very suprising.. they had quite the trip to apply for refuge status in the US. What I still don't get is how they got the thousands of dollars to make the trip... (arn't they suppose to be "poor" third world types - apparently they may be selling their land just to escape) None the less Kenya is overflowing with Somali's it is all good to "flee" but you need somewhere to flee. Also it would likely further entrench the courts. Since their own people will be most supported, the people who are out are those with weaker ties to the government or oppositional forces. (the side story is that they were trying to "expel" someone whose family was all american - they grew up since they were like 7 in America, getting ready to go to college.. kid gets caught with a gun, and they want to send him back to Somalia... (because he hadn't yet applied for naturalization) figure that. (now if it wasn't an extremist front in Somalia, it would be a good time to buy in) http://www.worldpropertychannel.com/international-markets/residential-real-estate/real-estate-news-somalia-south-africa-real-estate-african-real-estate-developers-abdullahi-nur-elasha-biyaha-afgoye-united-nations-africa-property-developers-3480.php

Canada could trade with Gadaffi and Syria, no one else seems to be..

Ok this is an interesting one I didn't expect to see. http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1049151--tories-ask-elections-canada-to-investigate-the-ndp-over-union-sponsorships So what was the clutch after 44 years to get the Conservatives to investigate the NDP's practice? -- was it a card up the sleeve for all those years just waiting until they became the official opposition? SPONSERSHIP NEED NOT BE MONETARY, IT COULD BE PATRONAGE.. wow money not being SPONSERING? Lets you know how these goons think. EVERYTHING IS MONEY.. what people think doesn't have value eh? Not going through it seems... What was this all about?

The Belhaj story is providing an interesting backdrop to what is ongoing... http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/04/libyan-commander-demands-apology I bet if Israel were involved they wouldn't apologize. This one goes out to Turkey and Belhaj. This is a good quote from Jibril - a leader of the TNC "“The crimes these people have committed are unforgivable in a conservative country like Libya.These people are dead and they know that they are dead, so they are fighting because they have no other option.” So why negotiate or let on that a fair trial will occur?

What for? It seems that works out to about 20,000 $40,000 salaries a year that could have been made. or 20,000+ new jobs.

Speaking of Afghanistan, this just yesterday -- is that a CF solider in combat gear in Kabul? NO it is KANDAHAR.. but but, didn't they leave a few months ago? http://www.stalbertgazette.com/article/20110903/SAG0801/309039983/packing-up What is this 100 Canadian soldiers assigned to a combat role... in Kandahar ON this past FRIDAY...-- but didn't the combat mission end? HUH? Doesn't look the same... http://www.dawn.com/2011/07/07/canada-ends-combat-mission-in-afghanistan.html That is ONLY 300 million less than the combat mission cost with personnel there.That is 2% of the funds for "ACTIONPLAN" Lets see how these numbers line up... stay tuned.. - HOW MUCH OF IT IS BEING BORROWED THE YEAR BEFORE? 461 BILLION IN NEW DEBT NEXT YEAR!!! It is all fancy when people can say we are reducing the DEFICIT BUT HALF A TRILLION DOLLARS IN NEW DEBT!!! my bad A 3rd of a trillion dollars... THAT IS MORE THAN A YEAR OF REVENUE in new debt! THIS MEANS THAT FOR EVERY YEAR OF 300 BILLION DOLLAR BORROWING, IT WILL TAKE OVER 1 YEAR TO REPAY IF ALL REVENUE WENT TO THAT. OR IN ACTUALITY IT IS MORE LIKE 6 YEARS OF HARD DEBT REPAYMENT FOR EVERY YEAR OF TORY RULE. TORY CARD MEMBERS OF THIS PERIOD WILL HAVE TO HAVE ALL THEIR PROPERTY CONFISCATED TO REPAY THIS AND PUT TO FORCED SLAVERY FOR LIFE OR UNTIL THE DEBT IS PAID DOWN. NEW DEBT TO ADD TO THE PILE IN 2011-2012 $263 billion Deficit is one thing.. but DEBT BORROWING IS ANOTHER.. IT IS JUST FINANCIAL VOODOO - THE DEBT BORROWING IS MUCH HIRE THAN THE DEFICIT! THEY ARE OVERSPENDING BY HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS!

The definition of victory is always something that people try to establish. Victory to a large extent is democracy in Libya. - Peter Baird http://news.scotsman.com/world/World-News-Libya-will-hold.6829669.jp Libya will hold election and a new constitution within 18 months promises new leader -Mustafa Abdel Jalil Cost now seems to sit somewhere between $170 and $200 Million as far as I can tell. For 18 more months an estimate of between 250 million and 1 billion is not unthinkable. Well all those cost savings from scaling down Afghanistan to 500 or so personnel are being realized in Libya I suppose. Canada has about 250 Billion to apply to its costs each year... 1 billion is about 1/250th of Canada's budget or 0.4% of Canada's annual revenue. What does this get them... apparently a back seat... co-warrior, no only for Britain and France - the people "really" at war with Libya http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-mr-camerons-libya-mission-remains-far-from-accomplished-2348440.html Speaking of Afghanistan, this just yesterday -- is that a CF solider in combat gear in Kabul? NO it is KANDAHAR.. but but, didn't they leave a few months ago? http://www.stalbertgazette.com/article/20110903/SAG0801/309039983/packing-up What is this 100 Canadian soldiers assigned to a combat role... in Kandahar ON this past FRIDAY...-- but didn't the combat mission end?

They can but there is no guarantee unless the tax breaks only apply to new positions. Example up to 10% of corporate taxes can go to personnel with salaries under $80,000 etc.. or under $50,000 depending on the target of job creation salary range. This same could be used to increase the median wages giving payroll, or a staff to income ratio. For every $100,000 of taxable net taxable income can be applied to salary of up to $50,000 example 50% tax cuts but those 50% have to be applied to new job starts, and salaries for new jobs can only go up to $xx,xxx to target unemployment reduction. In my policy plan - RIGHT TO WORK, the baseline salary of my job start ups is approx $20,000 (plus potential bonus on profit / work share) - this outright means that companies could start job starts at $20,000 and offset the governments need to socialize a segment of the workforce to insure employment. The threshold I would aim to give tax free employment would be $20,000-$30,000 in tax savings to employers for each job start up (prorated for period of personnel employment). The issue is that private job start ups directly translates to increased public debt unless profits meet or exceed the cost of employment meaning each start up needs to generate an additional 20-30k in taxable costs, meaning each employment start up needs to yield a 200% return on investment. The reason is that in my plan, for the first 15 years corporations pay down the debt, while the public pays for their services and at minimum balances the debt interest payments. Start ups thus would need to be in the 30k to 40k range so individuals were fully accountable for their own debt tax interest - this would in turn create a higher corporate tax rate - sans paid down debt variance since my corporate tax rate is locked into the public debt amount. This would require private start ups to only be 25%-50% tax deductible and requiring the position to have a salary of at least 30k but ideally 40k. This is doable though. IF you want jobs your breaks need to be DIRECTLY related to jobs. You can think, the more they have the more they spend. In reality it is The more they have the more they keep. Money makes money, not wings. Unless you are going for a pilots license. In that case Money makes wings and like the pub wings makes money.

Is he... house leader? http://pm.gc.ca/eng/bio.asp?id=59 That PM's page says he is.. Is it possible that date that needs to be moved within the next 5 sitting days of parliament was scheduled? (There is also a rift between Jalil and Jibril(and the TNC council/military council) - although it could be intentional miscommunication but more or less represents a policy difference on deployment of occupational forces within Tripoli. Comments like "Canada will be a part of the military mission until it reaches its conclusion," Harper said. (said Sept 1st) http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/09/01/pol-harper-libya-future.html

No, actually I didn't, I edited the post replying to your reply of the post (which was not edited since your reply to that post.) However just reply when you want to my edits are either amendments (mergers of text) or typo/grammar corrections - which often creep up in my writing online. Go ahead and comment now. This isn't congress if I need more than 3 minutes I have it.

No when party members say the government wants to extend the mission before there is a vote, that is a problem. Since how do you know if the vote hasn't happened yet? Saying the government wants to extend the mission as opposed to our caucus wants to extend the mission are two different things, when the NDP at this point are no go. This is as if saying parliamentary enquiry and discussion of the facts couldn't possibly lead to a scenario where the CF had no active role in Libya past sept 27th. I think that is contra democracy and contra parliament. This makes the point ever more so with Harper's Harper Government - one that he preached against mob rule in parliament - but is this the very reality of the Harper Government? Mob rule? Either the caucus has already discussed this or there is no concept of a free vote in the Harper Government - or everyone regardless of the situation is all koshure on bombing libya for a few more months just for kicks as flights and missiles grow on missile and jet fuel trees these days. The same place where the boat and lightening trees grow no doubt. They must feed on former civilian support staff job cuts. 1 Missile is what 20 jobs? 200 missiles 4000 job cuts? You might as well just given em helmets and a chance to go out with a bang. Strapem in after watching the stampede for a few hours. Ride em cowboy.. yea ha, there's only one way from here. Count those seconds! Guess they got to do something with all these huh? http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Canada+orders+smart+bombs/4800255/story.html 230 in may.. how much longer will it take to drop 4x that amount? hmmmm? 1300 x 100000 = 130 000 000 $130000000 While that is $130 million in cost unsavings right there. Half the cost of an unwanted election just to..... what was it for again? 1300 bombs to protect civilians? My gosh I'm sure the civilians were saved during the Dresden firebombings huh? http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110526/canada-libya-mission-110526/ 230 between march and may and 1300 to last until September 27th? My gosh this can't be true.. NATO ran out of weapons fighting ... Libya... ... Libya.. meanwhile Iran Syria Russia Central Asia and China or North Korea and Africa all exist too, what if they fought back.. no bullets, I don't believe this. NATO nations taking part in the Libyan war are running out of weapons. Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Canada+orders+smart+bombs/4800255/story.html#ixzz1WwONIutZ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/media/127508/The-Allied-firebombing-of-Dresden-Ger

3 seconds FULL STOP before turn on right, signs will indicate .. take a look at the drivers hand book of the province you are in MANITOBA.. driving laws are provincial not federal. www.mpi.mb.ca/PDFs/DriverHandbook/CompleteHandbook.pdf for Manitoba http://web2.gov.mb.ca/laws/statutes/ccsm/h060e.php Where can I find out traffic rules for Illinois? (not that I'll be going there for atleast another 4 years.. it is one of those brain teasers I havn't figured out... like do traffic cops have their lights in their rear license plate instead of their roofs? I wasn't sure if it was a show off or if he wanted to pull me over.. none the less the traffic jam got me and he caught up.. no pull over but weird stuff. Or do I pay tolls at every toll booth or just the one I enter? If I exit and enter the same toll area do I pay 4 times or 2 or once? Etc.? The only place in the US I was truely confused driving in.. even Texas with the APC's seemed a natural response just not to try to pass them. (always use caution if the thing driving in front of you has tires taller than the vehicle you are driving.)

The current security general - MOON is VERY VERY pro west - (he is south korean right..) Annan seemed far more "liberal minded" in many of his positions.... Moon actually seems to purport for active engagement. http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/02/55533990.html