Posit

What a nimrod. I have been married for 30 years youngster and own this place. What have you got to show for yourself. A used broken condom and 3 kids with FES?

Nope. You don't get a 6 figure income from being bad at what you do......

Actually, I am extremely wealthy and work when I want to. I research a lot write a little at a time, go for walks when I feel like it and generally enjoy all that life has to offer. I live on a self-sufficient estate worth about $750g's, with my family, have a six figure income and no need or want that isn't fulfilled. People pay to hear me speak, and my research has taken me to many wonderful places, helping out at archaeological investigations or participating in some altruistic community events. Do you guys actually work for a living or does the company donate its time, money and patience to allow you to troll discussion forums all day and answer personal emails? Ummm did someone say something about leeches?

Yes, Oleg....spiritual superiority trumps intellectual, emotional and physical priority. It even trumps financial superiority! They don't get that, nor would they because they are stuck in the lower order of human existence. And as you know they would need to shed their reliance on those lower levels in order to obtain such freedoms. I would suggest that poverty is merely a state of mind - one that temporarily usurps faith and allows conditioning to dominate the world. If you have truly attained the level I think you have then you need only see the illusion for what it is - an attempt by the ego, and those poor souls stuck in mediocrity to keep you down with them.... And what have you experienced here but that same mediocrity.........

The "out of Africa" idea is just a theory, albeit a credible one based on archaeology. However, as the archaeology of Austrialia, and the Americas progresses it raises questions about large gaps in the theory. The simultaneous evolution theory isn't my theory. It is one put forward by a number of scientist who have studied the data and postulated that a simultaneous evolution could have occurred. Modern interpretations of archaeological data suggest that the Americas was populated better than 100,000 years ago - long before "boat technology came into existence. The expansion out of Africa was by foot. Other scientists while holding on to the "out of Africa" theory have suggest that early occupations of the Americas could have been via Australia and Antarctica and are awaiting geological data to determine if Antarctica might have had a hospitable climate during that period and before. If they can't prove the land migrations then it adds fodder to the simultaneous theory. One of the basis of this theory holds that marsupials evolved both in Australia and South America at about the same time. It is "possible" in theory, that hominids also developed in the Americas at the same time. I understand that many of you don't find any theory plausible except one that supports your very limited view of the world. Even after Columbus proved the world was a sphere, there were still many naysayers right up until the 17th century. Darwin's theory is still a hold out for racists because it supports the superior race ideology. Yet Darwin has been debunked as well and still many hold on to some essence of hope that is might somehow be resurrected as scientific study. I would suggest that your objection to theories being presented is ingrained in your world view of Christian male dominance, which by evidence of parallel societies is absolute nonsense. That theory was debunked the minute Jesuit and Sulpician missionaries first arrived in North America - a place they called "Paradise", the Biblical reference to Heaven. And les savauges had it all.....

Then his opinion is as worthless as the mouthwash he has been using. Legal masturbation - using the law for self-gratifying purposes....i.e. Calling the police to your neighbour's house because he didn't invite you to his party.

Are you a scientist?

I'm not calling anyone "who disagrees" with me a "racist". I stated that those in the scientific community who perpetuate the myth that the natives have to be immigrants are racist...and I explained the reasons why.

Your boss was an ex-patriot Iraqi, with poor English oral skills?

No. You're just hell bent on protecting the WASP male cadre that makes the all rules. That's not evolution. It is form of legal masturbation.

Only the racists perpetuate this myth. They have to believe that indigenous people are immigrants themselves in order to justify the murder, rape and genocide employed by their ancestors to expand colonialism. A liberal estimate of Polynesian migration from South East Asia was only about 4-5000 years ago - not even close to the Bering Strait ice bridge (the idea of it being a land bridge is only a relatively new idea created by those scientists who won't admit to their failure in theorizing the Bering Strait migration went bust), and about 45-55,000 years after earliest evidence of human occupation in South America. Nice try though but it just proves how simplistic you people are.....Using elementary grade texts as argument to support your xenophobia is a pedantic tactic to say the east. ScottSA's relatives have a better chance at thinking it through than most of you do....

Oh you poor mentally incontinent xenophobes. If you read all that I posted, I said it was one of that "simultaneous evolution" was one of the main theories being considered. Simultaneous evolution looks at different species - including humans - from around the world and tries to determine the patterns and conditions. Kengs333 I call bullshit on your DNA theory since all the scientists following the path have embraced that there are similarities in DNA but not in migration patterns. The theory of migration was debunked when the Bering Strait theory fell apart. And it was incontinent thinkers like you who haven't a clue, who try to tie racial traits together without any knowledge or understanding of what studying DNA really means. As well, DNA investigation is only in its infancy and they have only used a small sample to postulate this grand theory. The fact remains that the 50,000 to 60,000 year old evidence of human occupation of the south predates many parts in northern Asia, so it is unlikely people originated there. It also predates the occupation of Europe by about 20,000 years, which is significant in that if people didn't migrate to the warmer climates, then why would they travel and live in the cold, sub-arctic climates like northern Asia....... While Pangaea is theorized to have occurred long before humans were thought to have arrived, it certainly was not before the DNA of our predecessors crawled out of the sea. And it leaves the possibility open that there was a concurrent development of human beings on both continents. From a research POV the recent archaeological finds of human occupation are compelling further archaeological study in South America. It was originally discounted because scientists had been investing in the Bring Strait Theory and had ignored the possibility that there was older human occupation in the Americas than what occurred during the ice bridge. No doubt it will require investigation to establish if human occupation began either before the "out of Africa" migration or after. Needless to say it appears to have been before Asia, and long before Europeans ever met their shit-flinging latent Neanderthals, that ScottSA likes to call his family. Kengs333 I suspect you haven't graduated high school, let alone community college or university. If you did then I would suggest that you also seek a refund since you make a poor example of why kids should stay in school and get an education.

I'm sure if welfare is not an option there then there are some cardboard homes in back alleys that can accommodate you. You might have to fight your neighbour over dumpster hash, but by the end of the night you might be able to get to sleep. Oh and winter is coming, so if you happen to be at the side of the street someone might be along with a used sleeping bag and a couple of bottles of water - everything a man who doesn't want to work, needs.

If I were you, I would check out your old Gaelic creation stories. Perhaps there is an indication of the Scots once being shit-flinging tree climbers. If not then perhaps they just evolved into the furry bastards and their latent Neanderthal genes eventually took over?

Pangaea. Since the archaeology points to the earliest occupations being from the south, it is likely that people in the Americas originated there. South America shares many similar geological and botanical traits with Africa. One of the main theories is that there could easily be that same evolution occurring in both continents at the same time.

Ah....the Crucifixion...You do know that Rev. Kevin Annett copied and exposed to the public the documents that the United Church had in their archives that recorded the deaths and the abuses committed by minsters and lay people at the schools under their control? The UCC destroyed the originals after being called on the genocide and Kevin Annett was ostracized from the church. However, he still retains copies that are to be entered into evidence at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission once it gets started next year. His evidence is only one part of the total collective indictment of genocide against Canada. As well, even though there has been an initial payment under the Residential School Experience fund, the rest of the lawsuits and stories have only just begun to be told. Expect a steady stream of witnesses to the murders to the abuse and survivors of abuse to come forward.

YOU must have the market on tin foil hats. The most plausible theory now being postulated is that migration did take place across the Bering Strait during the ice bridge but it went from North America to Asia. Since the oldest humans indicate around 50,000 years ago and given that the ice bridge only existed 10-12,000 years ago there is a pretty good chance this is what happened. Oh and BTW if you are depending on DNA to support your limited thinking maybe you should considered that 99.9% of all our DNA is shared with the fruit fly and the worm. (and I suppose I now know where YOU originated).

That would be a good guess if native people originated in Asia. But since the Bering Strait theory has been totally debunked by the scientific community, you'll have to make another lame attempt at defending fake Canadian cultural myths. Culture is inherited and passed along with languages. You might be mistaking tradition which often changes with the times, but does not alter the culture.

Oh look! Another Wikipedaidiot just entered the discussion! There is nothing that distinctly defines Canadian culture that wasn't borrowed or stolen from another culture. That doesn't define a Canadian culture. It merely creates fake culture.

It is interesting to say the least of your lazy reliance upon Wikipedia for your information. However, just to humour you, I followed the link and did some sleuthing on the so-called Circle of Justice. Well in summary, it doesn't exist as a legitimate body and is more likely people like yourself who wanted to debunk what Kevin Annett was promoting. At least IF there indeed is a Circle of Justice, it would only represent a very small faction of people, given the the Circle of Justice is a common name for Community Justice Forums, Aboriginal Healing Circles and Family Circle Conferences - all alternative justice systems and all coming from many different native communities. But this one appears bogus. http://sisis.nativeweb.org/resschool/sep2898coj.html

There is no such thing as "Canadian culture". It is a myth. Culture is defined by it icons. The only cultural icons Canadians claim represent our culture were borrowed from another culture. That neither makes them ours, or creates a culture. So ScottSA's superior culture is really superior nothing.

He exposed the Untied Churches dirty little secrets and now he is wearing a scarlet letter. His expose of the church is nothing new to the issue of genocide, but the copies of all the records he has in his possession, add to the evidence of the cover-up.

Incidently, I have researched this author.... You must have pretty poor research skills.

By all means research the author. And if that isn;t enough for you then follow some of the 10,000 links I Googled for you. Or are you too lazy and too frightened to challenge your myths?

We're not talking about 100 years ago. The question was directly to the point and applicable TODAY. What would you do if a criminal continually squatted on your front yard and the police and government refused to do anything about it? And only the business owners who expressed racism are being boycotted - and most of them by Caledonians, as well.