White Doors

Yeah, wasn't he one of the guys that helped build the atomic bomb? LOL!!

Are you an FN person? No, WASP, my husband is Miq' mah, as is my daughter. And we do belong to the Assembly of First Nations. Do you mean Miq Maq? As in an Indian tribe from the maritimes? Is this another lie like your service in the armed forces? I fiond it hard to believe you can't even spell the name of your husband's tribe correcty. Now THAT'S insulting to Miq Maq's everywhere. for shame

I also like how cathcme has the balls to say that SHE knows more of what is going on there than armyguy. She has been proven wrong so many times it's ludicrous. Her links are going weirder and weirder by the day. Getting more desperate.

Hear hear!

Really? I have heard such talk from soliders in Afgahnistan but I have never heard such talk from soldiers in Iraq. Are you being serious of polynewbie-ish?

You are assuming that a slaughter would ensue. Many Iraqis refuse to support a gov't which they believe is a puppet of the Americans - that is why wannabe policeman and similar targets are hit. Eliminate the Americans from the equation and you could see that the violance decreases dramatically.Nothing is for certain at this point in time, however, I don't believe the US troops are physically capable of stabilizing Iraq at this point so keeping them there likely does more harm that good. Any observer with no agenda would agree that this is now a war between Sunni's and Shiites. The Sunni's boycotted the elections and are now trying to regain control on their fiefdom. The only thing that has changed is that the Shiities are fighting back albeait in barbaric ways. You need 'boots on the ground' to bring a sense of stability and safety to those that are determined to kill more of those that 'your side' has lost. Increased security should help this.

Ironic that Coalition soldiers REPEATEDLY tell us to stay the course and that good things are happening isn't it? Are you a coalition soldier or are you just parroting the MSM?

A major fallacy when you re-read this is that it assumes that the 'poor people' and the 'rich people' are the same people. That is not a fact and it is not valid in the least. Besides Canada only the USA does a better job of letting you 'choose' which category you represent. Equality of opportunity, NOT equality of income IS and will REMAIN the answer.

No

Yes because Canada = Iraq as far as similarities and differences go. Let's hope we don't make the Turks and Caicos a CDN territory. Looks like there could be hell to pay from Washington. Well, as long as they target Toronto...

hahahahaha!!!!

Anyone else going to be looking over their shoulders next time they deposit a cheque at CIBC?

With rights comes responsibility. You can't have without the numbers no matter how far you bury your head in the sand catchme. Would you be against a law outlawing 3rd trimester abortions unless medically necessary? Answer the question

What about the rights of the unborn female? DO you believe that you should be able to abort because of the sex of the unborn child say in the third trimester? See how your 'rights' argument is in of itself a strawman?

Are those the death camps that FEMA has already built Poly?

Good point. I find that they also seem to assume it's the same people from year to year who are 'poor'. I was in the 'poor' bracket for probably 5 years after I graduated. I didn't mind and I'm not anymore. I'm sure that the majority of the 'poor' are people who were like me.

She also thinks that Canadian soldiers are Nazi's and that funding should be cut to them and accused them of intentionally killing Afghan civilians.

Where is this happening?

Ahhh... So you don't believe in democracy?

Actually it's "Mein Kampf". nice 'correction' there retard. About as brilliant as the rest of your 'proofs'. Are you related to Jean Chretien? JBG, can you step in here please?

And NONE of my proof has been discounted unlike yours. So please put an an example up of what contention of mine has been discounted? And no not many have or will agree, the Canadian military focus has not been of peacekeeping, that you have so deluded yourself says much.

Your ignorance of history is obvious to all.

Are you saying that your grandfather is still living? Because that would be a VERY easy way to find out who you are. Yet you are strangely silent on your military service? telling.

I provided the 2005 paper on defence from the governments own website about our militaries priorities and it DI NOT ONCE mention peacekeeping in the whole document. Yet you did not reply. Telling. You avoid the facts that do not fit with your world view. You still insist on your fraudulent military service and insist that Canada's army is primarily for peace-keeping which is an outright lie as has been proven to you.

you obviously have no Children.