Chrissy1979

You investigated and concluded she lied when she said there were death threats? Too bad your investigation didn't venture out of your own ass. You have no evidence to support your conclusion. You're a liar who would even lie to disparage a 13 year old r@pe victim. Classy! You'd think you would know better by 90 years old

I'm enjoying the "consequences." I would also like to watch it all fall apart.

Sounds like you haven't any defence whatsoever. That must mean you know you're wrong

Irrefutable, right?

The reality is you don't know if her claims of being threatened are false, but you're comfortable calling her a liar anyway. That's low even for a Trumper.

So you admit you won't be able to complain about Democrats doing the same thing in the future because you're not complaining about Republicans now. Maybe you should stick to the "I'm an old man and I don't understand" excuse. Lol

You don't have a problem with making death threats to young girls who have been r@ped? You must be MAGA! Waah! The meanie says bad things about supporting death threats against r@ped children!

Lying to defend paedophiles. Very honorable.

You’re calling her a liar based on nothing but your weak wanna-support-Trump feels, even though it’s obvious he’s a serial sexual abuser. If you were honest, you would admit he may have r@ped a 13 year old girl but you just don’t care and support him anyway.

I'll take that as a request to preserve the ability to continue to whine like a victim the next time a Republican gets charged with anything.

I don't think the Epstein crowd made empty death threats. They were committed. You would exploit that intimidation to justify calling her a liar. And not even be ashamed doing so.

Yes, you claim Biden did that so that makes it okay for future presidents or just Republican ones?

Yes, you could say that if you were comfortable with accusing self-declared child sexual abuse victims of being liars with no evidence to back that up.

You’re lying snd it takes a second to prove it. “A lawsuit was filed in 2016 by an anonymous plaintiff using the pseudonym "Katie Johnson" (later "Jane Doe"), alleging that Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein raped her in 1994 when she was 13 years old at Epstein's New York City apartment. The suit described graphic details of sexual assault, including claims that Trump tied her to a bed, forcibly raped her, and threatened her and her family's lives if she spoke out. It also alleged Epstein raped her separately and that both men knew she was underage. The plaintiff claimed she was lured to Epstein's parties with promises of modeling opportunities and money.The case was dropped shortly before the 2016 U.S. presidential election after the plaintiff reported receiving multiple death threats. Her attorney, Lisa Bloom, stated that these threats made the plaintiff too frightened to proceed, including canceling a planned press conference on November 2, 2016, where she was expected to reveal her identity publicly.” pbs.org

Indisputable, right?

We’re talking about using the power of government to go after political enemies. You guys are saying that because you felt the Democrats did that with Trump’s obvious crimes, you have no problem with this becoming the norm for both parties in the future. I think you like to pretend you don’t know what’s going on when you don’t like the question, although you do seem to be about 90 years old, so maybe that’s it.

She said she withdrew her quest for prosecution because of threats on her life and family. She never said she was lying. I can say it over and over, and anyone who looks further into the case can see I’m not lying. You’re a liar and you know it. You just don’t have the character to admit it, because that’s how liars are.

And you won’t have a problem when they do, right? Because that’s the kind of politics you want now, right?

No, dropping her case means she withdrew from pursuing prosecution. Her stated reason for doing so was because of threats against her. She never recanted her story, which would involve saying she was lying. The only liar is you. And you’re an unashamed one, even when defending accused paedophiles.

No, you posted how she dropped her case after being threatened. She never recanted. Doubling down on a pathetic lie doesn’t make it less pathetic.

Clearly not. She was shot five times for boxing in a vehicle. Is that the only example of “violence against ICE” you could come up with? That’s pretty weak. Sure you’re better at playing the victim thsn that!

Well, they got multiple convictions. Let’s see if you can pull that off. But I’m just noting that you now outright approve of using the government to go after political enemies, so the Democrats shouldn’t have to pretend otherwise anymore. You’re okay with that, right? There’s no low too low for you?

Yes, and the Democrats should too when they’re back in power, right? Because if their prosecution was political before, that means it no longer matters and it’s fine, right?

Turns out they shot her five times because she “boxed them in” with her car. Yes, I condemn ICE violence, if that was the question,

Another lie. How am I supposed to answer your question if you can’t even tell me what you’re asking about?