Chrissy1979

But the government openly threatened to take away their FCC licence if they didn’t fire him. That’s not something “the left” ever did and it certainly isn’t derived from “rules” they created.

"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it." Checks out.

There is no free speech in a fascist state. Just ask Boges.

So we’ve established that you’ll lie for paedophiles and political terrorists. Anyone else?

He said he had a plan to break Nancy’s kneecaps. How come you accept every word of his defence without question but ignore that part? We’ve already reached the point where you hysterical cowards want to make losing your purse a terrorist act?

You’re playing semantics to defend political violence. And you’re not even good at it.

Yes, it is. I guess Cdnfox would argue it wasn’t political because he only did it because he thought he was hateful.

It was violent and it happened because of politics. You can play word games and believe every word of his defence without question but, again, you aren’t fooling anyone.

So he broke into Pelosi’s house intending to “break her kneecaps” because he heard right-wing misinformation online and wound up nearly killing her husband, and you’re trying to misrepresent it as unpolitical. That’s almost as bad as lying about the testimony of a rape victim to defend a paedophile.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/the-man-accused-of-attacking-paul-pelosi-with-a-hammer-says-he-wanted-to-end-corruption

It was political violence, just like when you guys killed the Minnesota senator and just like when you guys shot Gabby Giffords. You can lie about it all you want in long, unreadable posts, but that doesn't change reality.

But he is a prominant Republican, not some nobody shrieking into the ether. Not to mention you are totally exaggerating the number of nobodies who disrespected Charlie's death. Lacking any real examples, you guys even tried to accuse me of doing that until I totally showed how that was a lie.

Not trying to divide and destroy western society though. And not making fun of political violence like DTJr. Just complaining about being murdered.

Here.

Are you seeing yet why I think you have the reading skills of a retarded third grader?

So you admit you lied when you said I shit on his life. I accept your apology.

All you guys have to do is post one quote of me “shitting on” Kirk’s life. You won’t because you can’t, so you will pretend you did instead. It’s the same pattern every single time. Lie, and then call people liars when you’re exposed.

But anyone with half a brain can see that you didn’t back up your accusation with a relevant quote. Do you really think you are fooling anyone?

Do you think exploiting Kirk’s death to promote a culture war to destroy western society, as you are doing, is respectful of his legacy? Do you think using it to get rid of free speech protections is what he would have wanted?

You’re just making stuff up now. I didn’t put forward any conspiracy theories. Do you even know what conspiracy means? And my thoughts and prayers were heartfelt. If they were mocking, I would have included a /s or an emoji. Busted for your lies again. 😂

You’re also really bad at this. I never “shit on Kirk’s life” in any of my posts and you just proved it. Do you think everybody is as easily fooled as you? Do you think calling people liars will distract from your lies, like you think calling liberals fascists will distract from your fascism?

No, literally everyone knows you guys are brainwashed by Russian and Chinese memes designed to destroy western society.

Cite?

I’m calling you a liar too, based on that post.

What did I say about Kirk? Oh right. You can’t answer questions to back up what you say. 😂