Rue

I can answer that. Justin now commands this space program Dougie is referring to and I don't need to tell you what a space cadet Justin was and still is. Dougie likes to call space cadets Liberals. I have no idea why. They named a constellation after Justin.... the Little Dipper. Regards, Lt. Spock

Who are these "some people". Do you have names, addresses?

The fact that you answer as in the above clearly indicates you have no idea how to respond to my challenges. For such an expert on so many things you seem full of shrugged confusion when it comes to defending your comments particularly when they contradict themselves and you try change the subject. Trust me you can not help me nor would I want you to. Your comments also indicate you can't help yourself.

Was that before or after you become Field Marshall for life?

As stated below the US political system has a checks and balances system It means neither the Senate, House of Representatives of President on their own, can control the country.It was a deliberate design to safeguard against dictatorship and tyranny and if anything the fact that the Democrats can stand up and challenge Trump proves there is nothing wrong with the US system and it does what it was designed to do. That said, I think the question is too general. The question would probably be better posed by asking what is wrong with Donald Trump? Well the easiest explanation for that is that he exhibits: 1-first and second stage Alzheimer's disease or another form of dementia as evidenced by his fractured sentences (asphasia), drifting, studdering in the middle of sentences (asphasia), being constantly confused in public as to where he is going, what he is doing, or who he is with, dry mouth-thick tongue, repetitive nose sniffing and nasal congestion (often part of dementia in early stages), hand tremors, bulging eyes (suggesting neurological and physiological issues); 2-narcissistic and anti social personality disorders; 3-untreated urinary infections, high blood pressure, depressive illness leading to aggravation if his dementia; 4-hides the fact he has dyslexia and can not read but it has come out with his inability to read a teleprompter or using blank paper as props for bills. This President has serious neurological as well as psychiatric issues, i.e., untreated depression. That said many people do in their late 60's and early 70's but they are not President of the US. Ronald Reagan as it now turns out was deaf and had dementia from Alzheimer's throughout his entire tenure but his wife whispered what he needed to do in his ear. FDR had polio and cancer. Eisenhower had numerous heart attacks. Teddy Roosevelt had adhd and dyslexia. Harry Truman had an anxiety disorder. Look people have disabilities. In the case of Trump though when you look at interviews of this man in the 80's compared to now you can see the difference. I personally believe he is such a loose cannon that he has a tight circle covering up his medical issues which in turn makes it difficult to deal with his behaviour and properly treat his issues. So what you see is someone who lives in a bubble. Anyone that disagrees with him is wrong. Period. In his narcissistic world there is no distiction beween "me" and "you". He can not perceive of a world where someone could not be of the same opinion as him and therefore any different opinion other than his, is a personal insult. He also engages in obsessive compulsive behaviour. He needs to wear his sleeves on his suits too long to hide what he believes are small hands (penis anxiety) which he brought attention to. The need for his tie to hang low on his crotch and most often be fire red is another sign of this penis anxiety. The hair cut is a classic display of aging denial. So is the peroxide in the hair and fake sun tan makeup. His need to constantly call women fat and men ugly also shows his own penis anxiety. We are dealing with someone who grew up with distant remote parents who showed no love or affection and would only communicate in rigid, stunted, bursts of criticism and so that is all he knows-harsh, fragmented speech which is critical of everything and anything. He can't change, he won't change. What he does not have due to his learned behaviour at home and then in the world is empathy. In his world, you have a tantrum and give ultimatums to get what you want. You don't discuss and achieve consensus, you demand. You scream and bang the desk. It is a world where you are born into amounts of money that define any values or possibilities. So now the question is why would Americans buy into this man? Americans had a President (Obama) they found to feminine and apologist. American culture and history is about military chauvenism, jingoism, pride,. stereotype masculine personifications in any actor, sports hero or politician. This is why Americans love football and their military. Trump was a backlash to eight years of a man who bowed to a foreign King (in Saudi Arabia) nit not a Queen (Liz), formed alliances and brought into the White House well known Muslim extremists, constantly made speeches apologizing for the US and had a more masculine and larger bodied wife than him making him seem weak and swishy. America is still very much a nation that wants its John Wayne. Trump engaged in John Wayneisms and still does. He tries to sound brash, tough, brutish, manifestations seen as personifying strength, pride and decisiveness all things that thought Obama lacked. Trump was a direct reaction to Obama and what was seen as the castrating woman "Hilary Clinton". It was not so much her corruption that turned people off of her, it was her attempt to come across as manly as Margaret Thatcher. In the Western world if you want to be a leader, like Merkel, Thatcher, or even Theresa May, you have to be clean and not have a husband who slept around on you and like you engaged in corruption. If you go to a country like Israel, Golda Maer was able to lead that nation precisely because Israel is a matriarchal society where grandmothers run the home. Ghandi in India was in a Hindu nation which has a complex and far different understanding of feminine energy and strength. The US like all Western nations struggles with its collective identity which is in the middle of a revolution as to how we define gender roles and identity and Trump was a backlash to that confusion and a call to get back to more clearer differentation in the roles. In Canada we have the most feminine Prime Minister since Pierre Trudeau and we have had some very feminine Prime Ministers, McKenzie King, Lester B. Pearson, Pierre Trudeau , Stephen Harper (who looked like a Lesbian or older Justin Bieber) , Paul Martin, now Justin, but we also have had stereotype males such as the vomit projectile drunk John A. MacDonald, barritone lounge lizard Brian Mulroney, lumberjack car dealer Jean Chretiens, swashbluckler dreamy blue eyed John Turner (actually aMama's boy) and who could forget our one female Prime Minister who made Ellen DeGeneres look soft. Politics and who are elected reflect how people feel about their own identities, i.e., how powerless or powerful they feel. When people feel secure they vote for feminine types. When they feel insecure they vote for masculine types. This could be quite simply explained by primal instinct which we see in all simeons (apes) not just homo sapiens.

He dishes out what is directed. Personal attacks are when some of us or all of us or any of us are accused of being anti Muslim because we call this individual out as a terrorist and challenge the attempts to hide behind mental illness or the Muslim card to suggest any criticism of this individual is unfair. Let me spell it out to you, there are millions of people with mental illness who do not commit terrorist acts. There are millions of Muslims who do not commit terrorist acts. The fact that you, Eye, Marcus, want to defend this individual under the guise he's a victim because he is a Muslim and/or mentally ill is a bigoted crock of crap that smeers all mentally ill people and Muslims in the same category as terrorists. Clear? How can I be even clearer, this individual is a coward terrorist who deserves to be hung by his testacles and left to rot. Clear as can be? You take a staple gun to do that. Clear? Oh hell let's not couch our words ok? Couching and posing as righteous liberal tolerant Saints preaching on behalf of victims for this coward is a friggin joke. He is no martyr. He is no misunderstood saviour being hammered to a cross. Clear? I said use a staple gun and staple his testacles upside down and him on a Maple Leaf tree and leave him to rot. Oooh how inappropriate; Gee wiz. In Canada however do not worry. As long as Justin is Prime Minister this individual will be paid $10 million and sent to a Trudeau camp for rehabilitation,you know the ones he will set up with money he does not have for war veterans. Oh no wait, Justin champion of aboriginal peoples, will send this scum to a healing lodge. Why not. Sending child killers to healing lodges is the Trudeau approach to such things other than millions in pay outs. Clear enough?

When a terrorist is a Muslim, and they are pointed out as being a terrorist, you exploit their Muslim identity and smeer all Muslims. You play the Muslim card to deflect from their terrorism. The fact a terrorist is a Muslim and uses Islamic beliefs to justify their terrorist acts does not make anyone anti Muslim for stating that. You are a bigot. You come on this forum and make clear open bigoted comments about Jews, Israelis and Zionists and anyone who calls a terrorist (who is also Muslim) an anti Muslim. That is your m.o. on this forum as evidenced by the above pathetic attempt at smeering. Instead of accusing others of bigotry look in the mirror and accept what you are which is not only a bigot but someone who lumps all Muslims and Muslim terrorists in one category to apologize for extremist Islamic ideology and the terror it can express. You are the worst example of what you accuse others of.

I have. he is a terrorist and should be hung up by his testacles, and left to rot. Clear enough? You really want to play? You want to play he is not a terrorist go ahead but don't suggest what anyone else has concluded but me on this one. As for you, you already concluded he is a misunderstood victim. What is your point that only you are allowed an opinion? Don't play. You are the most bias person on this forum but you try pose as what exactly? He's a terrorist. Hard for you to swallow. If he was an Israeli or a Jew you would be calling for him to be gassed. Spare me the righteous indignation.

Yes it was stupidity for you to say that and now try deny what you said and what I challenged. There would be no other reason for hat and to quote you: " I mean duh ". Say now I knew you sounded like Justin. Is that you Justin writing in? Uh uh uh duh.

Dougie has now stated: “Well, as per my post, operating under the ice is a special operation requiring a capacity which is at this juncture only within the purview of major military powers, which Canada cannot, will never be and should not aspire to be..” The issue I contested that Dougie stated and I challenged is not nor has it ever been that operating under ice is a special operation and/or a submarine operation. I now note when you respond to me you deflect from your actual comments that I reproduced and challenged or simply ignore them and now change the topic. Dougie also made this statement I challenge as well as the above one: “Polar under ice operations is the biggest of the big leagues at 15 minutes notice to launch on warning, where you need to have your big boy pants on, and Canada, as an infantilized Fake Country pseudo colony, not only never puts its big boy pants on, but rather doesn't even have any big boy pants at all to put on, even if it was ever inclined to want big boy pants, which it doesn't.” To start with it is a fact no one disputes in any political party in Canada or other than you that Canada needs to patrol its Northern waters on a consistent basis because under international law if it does not, it does not sustain its sovereignty, and its lack of sustaining that sovereignty through the demonstration of regular patrols can be construed in international law to mean Canada has given up its right to sovereignty over those Northern waters and passages. That is clearly a concept you do not grasp but is why no one in Canada but you thinks its not necessary to display sovereignty through patrols in the North, even Justin Trudeau. Next to establish sovereignty Canada can do this in many ways such as: 1-flying jet fighters regularly over the Northern waters, lands and passages and challenging infiltration of Russian aircraft. Because of our NORAD agreement overflights by the USAF in Canadian territory or vice versa can not be considered an infringement of sovereignty of either nation; 2-excusions by Inuit in kataks, small boats, would constitute sufficient display of sovereignty if the went out in certain passages with the Canadian flag showing on their boats and in fact we have what are called “Rangers”, who do just that to protect their hunting areas and also enforce Canadian sovereign rights; 3-ice-breakers would be the most obvious way to do it. In fact ice-breakers not sub-marines as well as jet fighters would probably make the most operational sense at this point but our aging jet fighter fleet and lack of ice-breakers while we wait for some to built is empowering not just Russia but NATO allies such as France, Britain, Denmark, Norway, as well as the US, China and Japan to sail our Northern waters seeking claim to its resources including what is believed to be underground oil not to mention fish and wales or seeking short cuts to pass oil carrying superships to Asia. Now let’s look at your idiotic comment about “ Polar under ice operations is the biggest of the big leagues at 15 minutes notice to launch on warning, where you need to have your big boy pants on,”. Right now the Japanese manufacture a submarine called the Soryu class. The Hull is is made with precision made special steel that can withstand great pressures and depths and ice. The Germans now make state of the art submarines as well. Either country has offered to sell Canada state of the art submarines that could easily patrol the North not to mention we could buy second hand French subs that could do the same. Our diesel engine subs major problem was not ice but malfunctioning engines. Getting a modern state of the art sub that can withstand strong pressures and ice is not the issue. Being willing to spend money for them is and as I said, submarines for Canada do not necessarily need to be used up North, jet feighters, small craft and ice breakers can do that. Submarines are need to engage in surveillance of human and drug trafficking and illegal fishing. The issue now is not that we need a navy but why Trudeau has wasted trillions and not put one penny into the armed forces and is buying second hand deflective F-18's from Australia.

I never asserted you said Canada has a space program and no the words you printed and I have reprinted did not merely state Canada operates in space.

I appreciate you now pose as an astronomer, astrophysicist. and oceanographerTO ADD TO YOUR past posts WHERE YOU posed as a military weapons expert on air, land and sea operations. I met another man like you once. You remind me of him. He insisted on being called Your Excellency and would remind me all the time he was a President for Life, Field Marshal, holder of a doctorate from the University of Kampala and was Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fisheries of the Seas not to mention Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular, as well as the real King of the United Kingdom. Excuse me your Excellency but I have some reservation as to your comment that: "Space is simple, because the medium of space is a stable vacuum, which is the simplest thing in the universe in fact." No doubt space seems simple to you. I However that may be you self-reflecting your own neurological and cognitive levels of development and therefore reference. One could also speculate it is also possible that space seems simple to you because you do not have sufficient awareness, comprehension or understanding of the many universal and absolute physical laws of the universe including mechanics, thermodynamics, gases, conservation and relativity because if you did perhaps you would show more humility as to their complexity. Some of us do know that there is one law of the universe that postulates matter cannot be created, nor can it be destroyed and somatter is believed because of that to remain constant in the universe but do you think the laws and concepts of space end with that one? One only need look at black holes for example to realize hey are anything but stable yet are an intrinsic component of space and so necessarily contradict your "simple stability" description unless of course you would have us believe dark matter/energy and blackholes are simple let alone stable and don't impact on the stability of the universe. We also now know that parts of universe (galaxies and galactic clouds) disintegrate and re-form in what is believed to be cyclical stages to sustain general distribution of macro bodies in universe . Why would you think those cycles are simple let alone evidence stability? Tell me, how do you know that waves of universe destruction do exist and ripple at the speed of light or faster, and so because of that would prevent you from having any idea this destruction was in progress as we speak and is in fact unstable and presumably your individual destruction will happen but far too quickly for you to form any awareness of its inherent nature let alone stability or lack thereof. I am also curious to know why you find space simple and stable because to make that conclusion you would need to know: 1-how big this universe is 2-how many dimensions it has 3-whether there is more than one universe 4-what process originated all universes 5-what both time and space are 6-how what we perceive abut space is accurate. What know simply from reading your comment that space is simple to understand and stable is that you have no clue as to the most basic and fundamental aspects of the quantum nature of the universe let alone reality because if you did you would not refer to them as simple let alone stable.

As well you made this statement: "Space is simple, because the medium of space is a stable vacuum, which is the simplest thing in the universe in fact Submarines is complex, because the medium of inner space is water, which is exponentially more complex than the vacuum of outer space.." which necessarily contradicts your earlier comment: "Doing submarine operations under the polar icecap is like a space program..".

Doing submarine operations under the polar icecap is like a space program, it's just an inner space program rather than an outer space program. Read the above two comments. Then follow your own comment: "you are completely ill informed on the matter and making fallacious and nonsensical assertions as a result. " Only I do not shrug, I just repeat back your contradictions and "explanations" of oceans and space or as you call them inner and outer belly buttons.

Dumb down? My point precisely. For someone who poses as a peacock you come off as sea gull guano. That's the closest ornithological analogy I could find to describe the substance of your emissions.

True but... I challenged this idiotic statement he made: “Doing submarine operations under the polar icecap is like a space program, it's just an inner space program rather than an outer space program. “. To start with Astronauts are not submarines. In fact it is of course true astronauts train underwater because the neutral buoyancy can help them predict what it would be like to be in zero gravity in space. However Submarine training and astronaut training are not the same and have never been, A A submarine operation in fact has few similarities with rocket propelled vessels that break gravity or re-enter gravity and no their operations are not the same. I would also suggest you look at this article to see my further point: https://www.cnet.com/news/how-nasa-trains-astronauts-40-feet-under-water/… …you will see that article states: “Forty feet below the pool's surface is the huge ISS mockup. Because the water is crystal clear and totally calm, you can see everything -- and it's bizarre. Your mind tells you something is not right about what you're looking at.” This individual himself stated: “but under the ice it's hard to track anything, under the ice”. I am challenging his lazy prose, his sloppy analogies and his absurd comparisons. Also astronaut underwater training is not done under polar ice caps to move people as if they would be in ocean waters. In fact its done in a tank of water at the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory (NBL) near NASA's Johnson Space Center so as to be able to completely control the water environment unlike the case with an ocean. The water in those tanks is far from what it is like in real waters in the ocean, i.e., they are not subject to currents, electro-magnetic pulses.

It is absolutely amazing, a true delight to be part of your military expertise and insights that you share. Thank you and who needs Vladimir Putin. Now look you have me or some of the other regulars absolutely beat on the sheer volume of truths you can dispense. I mean I thought I was close to the divine Now in regards to your above comments I numbered for the sake of ease when making references: 1-As far as I know you are wrong. 2-You don't think, indeed. Oh but do share your information for such a conclusion. 3-Of course it is. 4-No its not the only reason of course not. 5-Why if all 3 can do it only 2 are experts? 6-Like a space program? Yah I could see how you would confuse the polar icecap to outer space. 7-Why desperately? How do you know they don't do it with sheer orgasmic delight? 8-Submarines don't "attack shipping lanes" and "maritime approaches". Maritime approach. Oh do explain how you approach a Maritime.. Yooh hoo Maritime want to feel my missile?.Certain submarines might be prepared to target and sink ships in shipping lanes or in the oceans but since WW2 this is has not been done with several exceptions in limited conflicts. and you really need to go find out why Mr. Submarine expert. Also there is this thing called radar. It still works you know. Ping ping. This idea you have that all submarines today are stealth is fun fun fun but not true and stealth if you knew anything about it is not when it comes to submarines reliable but hey you knew that-sk any whale or porpoise why. By the way just to clarify, there are no Artic Char in space. Just so you know. More importantly you knew that the majority of submarines today are used for surveillance and spying not attack and it is far more efficient and less expensive to use small surface ships if one or aircraft whenever possible in an attack formation and that today the majority of naval strategy for attack would be via missiles which submarines can fire yes indeed but are far more expensive at firing than fighter jets or even drones or soldiers with shoulder mounted weapons not to mention these things called wait for it, helicopters. Of course the Taliban and Al Quaeda still have camels swallow bombs and walk into enemy camps and go kaboom. Some of them do it as well although most of them are cowards. 9-Hey now...sit for this one...militaries are designed to fight wars-Canada's armed forces purpose which is to defend against armed attacks by other nations is not collapsing any more than a transvestite collapses when in drag. They are what is called operationally dysfunctional (you know they can't get it up) because they do not have sufficient equipment and the equipment they do have requires to many man hours to repair to remain functional. This does not mean they have ceased being a war fighting outfit. Their pee pees still pee (I put it in words you could understand). Even if only one soldier remains and he can barely pee he still pees.. That is what military outfits do, they pee pee. Next you will tell me Rue Paul does not wear his outfits to be feminine but to instead does it to play NFL football. 10-Champagne tastes? Oh do share some examples. You mean like a jet that can fly, a ship that can float, a gun that can fire? 11-Cushy it is? Canadians "going down"? Sorry it sounded like were sharing a gay porno fantasy before I got to the end of the sentence, and just to make it clear you go for it with those fantasies.....this is Canada, gender fluidity in the armed forces is welcomed. No need to be binary. Let me conclude and thank you again for sharing. I am in awe of your writings. Not even on the strongest of laxatives cam I come close to such volume. That said and of course wanting to assure the powers that be that I am sticking to the topic just like you may I again state Justin Trudeau is the worst Prime Minister Canada has ever had and to prove that point may I suggest one consider his policies to date on: 1-paying off a terrorist $10 million dollars; 2-enabling thousands of illegal entrants to Canada to be rewarded with the right to apply for refugee status even though they come from safe third countries where they could have applied for refugee status and contrary to the existing laws that reject refugee applicants coming to port of entries the right to apply for refugee status when they come from safe third countries; 3-an accumulation of so much debt, that Canada is now bankrupt and the interest rate alone on that debt will cause inflation and hardship for the next 10 or more generations of Canadians escalating in a snow ball effect causing damage to generations even after that;4-a complete and utter failure to deal with oil pipelines, aboriginal issues; 5-standing up in Parliament and out and out lying and when caught lying running out of the Parliament; 6-engaging in conflict of interest vacations then lying and saying he would meet with the Ethics Comissioner over the issue then refusing to meet with that Commissioner; 7-lying to war vets and claiming there were no funds for them while (hey Rocky watch me pull a Rabbit out of my hat)paying $10 million to a unibrowed grinning terrorist who now wastes taxpayers money whining he can't speak regularly with his terrorist sister nd Mama; 8-engaging in a tactic in Parliament of now whenever being questioned, refusing to answer the question with a canned statement to avoid answering the question; 9- repacing oral communications with the sound of a seal masterbating...uh uh uh uh uh. How do I know it's a seal masterbating and not a walrus? Come on I understand Liberals. Some of my best friends are seals. Also Lisa Laflamme told me. -

Either or. Yah I know in your world its all black or white, nice and simplistic, rigid left or right choices. No that is not how diplomacy or conflicts start or are resolved or communicated. Its all about nuances-what's not said, what is not done, inneuendo, timing, inferences. God would you go clear up your complexion and come back when you can shave-your comments about Canadian military history and international relations and conflict resolution are past naïve and idiotic to the point of absurd. Stop and think. Hua Wei has been turned down and unable to do business in Australia, New Zealand, the US and Britain. Ring any bells? Ding a ling. Those are intelligence sharing partners. Trudeau told our intelligence sharing partners he didn't care about the intelligence leaks and how Hua Wei platforms were being used to spy on these nations and Canada and Trudeau was on the verge of announcing huge research contracts with Hua Wei that would have compromised intelligence for all these nations. So of course not Trump but the behind the scenes intelligence interest in this issue had the CEO of Hua Wei operating in Vancouver bribing government officials issued with a deportation order. It was a warning to Trudeau by all these nations not just Trump and it is precisely why the UK, Australia, New Zealand and the US have all said nothing as Canadians get arrested in China. As for China is hoped by arresting Canadians, to get Trudeau to panic and release this CEO. In fact it did the exact opposite. China finessed itself because international relations is all about saving face. If China really wanted this CEO released it would have never played its hand. In fact Trudeau could have played ignorant and let the CEO plead diplomatic immunity or claim no deportation to the US on the grounds the charges were based on political not legal considerations. Either way she had and still has a very strong legal argument. China misread Trudeau's idiot statement. Had Trudeau not stated he had full knowledge of the CEO being arrested and instead said he had no knowledge, his foreign affairs office would have intervened and sent her back to China by "bureaucratic mistake" saying the extradition notice didn't get to them in time to stop her from returning to China. Instead the idiot Trudeau immediately claimed he knew she had been served notice, taking away that card to play. Trudeau can not resist the urge to shoot his mouth off in public to make himself look like he knows everything. What an idiot. China not realizing Trudeau is a moron, thought he said what he did on to side with the US. China thought it was being back stabbed by Canada because they did not realize, no, Trudeau is just a moron. Canada was the only nation to state it would continue to do business with Hua Wei after all our intelligence allies refused saying they were a spy operation. Trudeau phacked up big time. He does not understand intelligence priorities and how Hua Wei is a Chinese intelligence platform that piggybacks on all communications systems illegally to suck out confidential trade secrets. Trudeau is an idiot. . He admires China. China is also a large blood clot like Trudeau's brain. No oxygen is getting to the head of the Communist Party. These idiots are too stupid to study the laws of Canada to understand how they work and how no one gets extradited for political reasons. Trump openly stated he was going to use the CEO of Hua Wei as a trade chip to get a better bargain for the US in trade with China. That stupid public comment evidences the arrest is for political not legal reasons this providing a golden opportunity to vitiate the extradition request. As well the trade sanctions the US has charged the CEO with breaking are not recognized by Canada. People need to slow down and understand this is just another manufactured crisis. We are dealing with intelligence concerns, spying, compromising trade secrets, trade battles between Canada and the US over who gets a better deal with China and out intelligence allies pissed off at Canada. In the meantime the Stalinist thug running China evidences he is one stupid man. He got to where he was by being a Kim of Korea-someone who does not create or initiate and only reacts and creates power through murdering his opposition. The leader of China is a Stalinist-a thug dictator. Mao tried that. He lasted as long as he did by killing millions. This man is now doing the same but Mao eventually had strokes and dementia and was surrounded by back-stabbing vipers who took out all his teeth and left him to gum at his porridge. Eventually the same will happen with this latest Stalin-Maoist thig if an internal revolution by his own military does not dethrone him. He has made a big show in the South Pacific sea with man made islands and a huge increase in naval ships, but his air force is a joke and he can barely feed his soldiers and his state of the art warships have defective surveillance, radar and electronic technology easily jammed. China is a credit threat not military thread. It can take down our Western economy in minutes. It doesn't need a military to screw us. Eventually this woman will fly back to China. This is just another fake crisis. Now if you ask me I think Canada should take its air force whose jets no longer operate and non existent navy and attack China. What a joke. Trudeau the genius ordered the replacement of rotting of F-18's with rotting F-18's from Australia. Brilliant move. How about or navy. We have I believe at this point 3 vessels that can operate. But hey who needs a military. You know the world is a great place. Never mind the illegals flooding our borders, the drugs coming in our unguarded borders, the sex trafficking-who needs borders patrolled? Oh come on man, like wow, military is like so like so imperialist man. Let's have a doobie and export or laws of smoking doobies to China man. We have so much to share, man.

Without a doubt the most stupid post I have ever read on this forum and that says a lot. Reality check? What a selective revisionist take on history with no reference to Hitler, Korea, the invasion of Canada by the US. You are a classic example of a pimple face historian. Go look that up. Before you pose as an expert on Canadian military history and tlk down to others clear up your pimples and learn about Canadian military history. Start with who Hitler was. Good God do you even read books? Of course not. Life is a ten second fractured message on the cell phone followed by infinite universal wisdom and awareness. Someone get me my tranquilizer gun. I need two shots to his left buttocks. Its clearly out of control.

Climate change and air pollution are of course inextricably linked and to suggest otherwise is like saying lung cancer and lungs are not related. Your calling me Climate Barbie because you have no substantial response and fill it with such inane references speaks for itself. Globalist ideology please define. You are so full of buzz pop words you have no idea what they mean. Globalist ideology my ass. Air pollution is an atmospheric condition of the planet of course it has no borders and treatment for itvwould be global. No the Rothchilds and your illuminati new world order have nothing to do with that. Go on please explain how the Rothchilds invented co2 emission scams. Are you that silly? Yah they made it up.

Of course.

He knows the difference. He's being petulant for a change.

Religion + valium = hari krishna Religion + LSD = cults Religion + alcohol = Christianity Religion + overeating = Judaism Religion + singing from towers and eating binges = Islam Religion + steroids = terrorism Political correctness + guilt over being rich = leftist Hangover + drug withdrawal = rightist Sexual dysfunction + penis size anxiety = facist anyone who claims to know the truth = Satanist women = pagan witches + illuminati transsexuals + apple eaters therefore humans = affected

www.sane.og Above is a site that explains what I said in easy to understand terms for Eye and those of you who want to persist in misappropriating the terms psychotic and psychosis when describing violent criminals or terrorists or trying to suggest it is a diagnosis unto itself or is as Eye said based on reality. A psychosis might bend or extend reality to a new shape of belief but it's not one that would be based on reality but would be used to redefine reality, i.e. in its extreme form it's totally detached from reality which was how the word psychotic was used in the past. Today we don't use it that way, we don't use neurotic or psychotic as stand alone definitions and psychosis is seen as a variation of reality that the rest of us experience in most references. Psychosis is not something terrorists suffer from because in fact their views acknowledge the same reality, but in fact violently imposes their set of moral and political views on others as to how to control that reality. It is not about changing reality but unilaterally controlling it by and for terrorists. It's a form of extreme violent pack behaviour led by an alpha personality. We've moved on fro sticks, rocks and spears to rifles, bombs, vehicles to bash the other pack to death. Terrorists see what you and I see, but wish to control our resources including thought, in a manner they deem fit . That is the best I can do to explain it for someone like Eye who seek to white wash it to make excuses for it and reframe it as a symptom of victimhood... and to send him to rightasrain.uwmedicine.org.

To be specific the word psychosis not psychotic might be used but as a sub-category of description of symptoms not a diagnositic term or diagnosis by itself. It is most commonly used when describing types of schizophrenia. The term psychotic might be used in the word anti-psychotic to describe a specific class of drugs but even that word is now being discarded by pharmacologists, pharmacists and psychiatrists because that class of drugs has been for the most part replaced by new drugs. Anti-psychotic medications like Thorazine are not often used anymore. They have been replaced by a different class of drugs with far better results and less side effects such as seizures, tremors, twitches, shaking, excess fatigue, weight gain, paralysis, blurred vision, loss of hearing, delayed reflexes, etc.