Jump to content

j44

Member
  • Posts

    598
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by j44

  1. At least they spend a line here and there acknowledging their questions...sometimes. lol Does anyone have any idea why the NDP spend the first few questions in QP attacking about the Election Canada stuff but then switch to other topics like political appointments? They do this often and it seems like a bad strategy.
  2. I bet they do that from now on. It won't matter what the question is. The answer will be 'well, the Liberals did this and that.'
  3. I'd love to see some more info. on that. And the NS NDP settlements with nurses etc.
  4. You could also argue that he could have won long ago if Newt etc didn't have billionaires funding their Super PACS. I read that Newt's Super PAC outspent his campaign 70:1 in Georgia. 70! Obama has had 100 fundraisers while in office. I think that is twice as many as Bush had at this point in his term. And I would guess Bush's was the most up to that point. We want MOAR!
  5. I like Cullen but sometimes he comes across as almost too polished and I can see how that might turn people off.
  6. I have no basis for this but I think we might get someone running a campaign at the riding level to get the book thrown at them but I'd be surprised if there is any connection much higher up. I could be wrong though. Frankly I find it sad in the sense that I'm not surprised this goes on and I'm not excusing any of this but I'd bet this level of fraud exists in most of the parties at some level. That probably says more about how I see the system than anything else though. Whoever takes the blame for this I can't see any final word or conviction or anything like that coming down any time soon. Didn't the Conservative just drop their appeals to an apparent fraud case from like 5 years ago?
  7. I also mean I'll wait before I write the entire party/government off as being behind it.
  8. Even if he is a Conservative I'm still waiting to see who (if anyone) directed him to do what he did.
  9. I’d lean toward Romney taking the nom too but I think there is still a chance Newt bows to pressure and gets out. Newt might be swayed by something like a Sec. of State promise from Santorum. Who knows. I'm not saying it is likely that Romney doesn't win but one on one I think this whole thing changes. I'm also reluctant to listen to the moderate Graham talk about Romney. Again, not to disagree just for the sake of disagreeing but I'm not 100% convinced that Santorum wouldn't do well in the rust belt against Obama. He could get the base juiced up in a way that (so far) Romney can't. And I'm not a Santorum fan but I see how he appeals to some voters. Although, I'm sure many here will call me crazy for even suggesting that. Just something to think about. Here is an interesting piece on how Romney doesn't get to 1144. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/03/09/romney_really_might_not_have_the_delegates_by_june.html
  10. Even so, just because the C may have a better database doesnt mean the other parties have no lists at all. But i don't think anyone can say anything that would get you to doubt (even for a second) that youre 100% right.
  11. I'd bet they don't believe that and are at least concerned about this issue. How do you know the liberals dont? Don't you think you're jumping the gun with the blame so fast? These calls just happened a few hours ago didn't they?
  12. Maybe it's just me but I don't think the Conservatives Would use robocalls like this right now. Especially when they can just wait two weeks to find out like the rest of us. And why are you assuming the C would have that list but te Liberals wouldn't?
  13. Because I thought there was going to be a fight.
  14. That's not what I said.
  15. EC investigating could lead to jail time for someone. I'd lawyer up. There is no downside to it. He could look guilty in some eyes but he does w some already. Better safe than sorry.
  16. I would hire a lawyer if I was in his shoes. Innocent or guilty
  17. Oh no, you took the bait. It begins!! Lol
  18. I saw that interview. She was downright terrible. And some of the questions seemed softball. Also, Singh used his question on Ashton too?
  19. Every Ramones song.
  20. She gets odder looking every time I see her. Lol She's terrible at answering questions. I know everyone tip toes around the ones they can't or will not answer but she needs to be less obvious about it.
  21. Thanks
  22. How do I delete a post? I put one in the wrong thread and could only edit it so I just left a period in it's place.
  23. Interesting that Mulcair used his first question on Ashton.
×
×
  • Create New...