betsy

I'd like you to give the specific contradictions that you assume are stated in the article. Surely, you don't expect me to search for them. Furthermore.... Though I've never heard of anyone describe the Bible as "imperfect," you misunderstood what you'd quoted. I was talking about PERFECT UNITY..... ..............which means, the consistency throughout from beginning to end, despite having been written by various authors from various walks of life, from various time-lines.

Have you watched the video? Talk about the points given. The message has not differed in the different versions that are mainstream. Of course, we're not talking about versions that are re-worded, edited and designed to cater to special interest groups, or political correctness.

I haven't heard any believers claim it to be imperfect. How so? Explain what in your view, makes it imperfect.

The Bible has a unique structure. And it should be pointed out, and stressed! Despite being a collection of 66 books, written by 40 or more different men from various walks of life, over a period of 2,000 years...... .......it is clearly one Book, with perfect unity and consistency throughout.

The Bible. Yes, I give the Bible as evidence for the Christian God. Please refer to the new thread.

Two kinds of information are given in the Bible.....some can be checked, while some can't be checked. As an example would be our inability to check for the scientific accuracy of Genesis 1:1 ( “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” ).........although science does not rule out that possibility, and that declaration is in no way inconsistent with current scientific data.

That's the question usually asked by non-believers. This video addresses the arguments usually given by non-believers. For those who want to discuss, please watch and we'll discuss the points given in this video on why we should trust the Bible. Honesty test. Telephone Test. Corroboration test.

Good question. Though your question is not directed at me....what a coincidence that I just reviewed the evidences why you should believe the Bible. The answer is coming up.......soon. Update: refer to

Relativism. Besides, if it's indeed self-defense - then, it's not murder, is it? Our justice system may've gotten it right, or wrong. We've heard the saying, "he's gotten away with murder." However, just because someone was able to fool the law, it doesn't make it any less if it was a calculated, deliberate killing of a person. It's still murder. God knows. The perpetrator knows in his heart he committed murder.

Trudeau took credit as being the one to have explained to Trump about the basics of NAFTA - as in, many jobs depend on NAFTA (like as if Trump hasn't a clue about that fact) - and that he was the one to have convinced Trump to re-negotiate! Embellishment! Just like Sajjan's - to make himself look good to Canadians! Pathetic! These two have a serious problem with self-esteem!

Because of Obama! It's not Harper's fault if Obama is an environmental loonie! With Trump's victory - Trudeau knew all along where Trump would be heading, pipeline-wise. Trump's been saying it during the campaign. Trudeau had to go along.... The fact is TRUDEAU CLAIMED ALL THE CREDIT in the interview! He didn't share the credit with Mexico and the lobbyists. Trump's narrative was very much different - he mentioned Canada and Mexico! Trudeau may've not put the words in Sajjan's mouth - but he behaved like Sajjan! Sajjan must've been inspired by lying Trudeau! Just shows you......lying comes naturally to the Liberals!

Uhhhh....maybe our Defense Minister will reminisce about the time he took sniper shots with Hillary on the tarmac? Or, the unforgettable ride on a shot down helicopter with Brian Williams?

What's with the LIberals' penchant for taking sole credit, which is actually telling lies.....just so to tell tall tales? It starts from the very top. Justin Trudeau. Justin loves to take credit - from the Keystone Pipeline (implying somehow he had something to do with its approval - when in fact Stephen Harper did all the heavy lifting, and it's only fortunate for Trudeau that Trump (who had the same vision as Harper), became President (and not his bosom buddy Obama who'd sunk it!). Then, Trudeau took credit from Trump's reversed decision about NAFTA. Like as if it's only Trudeau who talked to Trump, and thanks to Justin's "wisdom" - he knocked some sense into Trump! And now.....here comes our Defense Minister Sajjan, who took credit for Operation Medusa in Afghanistan! http://www.torontosun.com/2017/04/29/defence-minister-sajjan-under-fire-for-operation-medusa

FAKE NEWS! You're giving all the credit to Trudeau! It wasn't just Trudeau! It was both Trudeau, Nieto and American lobbyists! Timer: 1:00 The narrarive of Trump is different from Trudeau's. Trump didn't say Trudeau had convinced him:

Not banned, but "different."

Why do I care what happens to the US economy? IF we're going to largely rely on the USA for our security, we better pray it doesn't go belly-up!

Wisconsin isn't the USA. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lori-wallach/nafta-at-20-one-million-u_b_4550207.html