betsy

Yeah. That's why you're boring. It's the same "bigotry" and "Nazi" same-old rhetoric you spew. No one can say anything without getting labelled "KKK!" You must mean "the ostriches" don't know what they're missing. How can they know when they've got their heads buried in the sand? Ahhh...."xenophobes" must be the latest addition to your vocabulary.

Having a section that can accomodate what don't belong anywhere.....how is that censorship? I don't want to gag HE....but I'm getting tired of seeing the same things all over the place! That's the complaints of what few regular active posters left on this board! Where do these go? Some of these (not verbatim), are in another forum. Strange Phenomenon The best advice given to you Cop stops to dance video The stupidest things we've said Your fave Fastfood Burger 6-foot Boa Constrictor found hiding in attic It's a bad hair day! You're assuming. And you're basing your "judgement" on your assumption. Posters may not want to discuss those listed above - but what if some do? The kind of "discussion" that happens might not be to your liking....but surely, if we want to have humor and banter, or if we take these topics seriously - shouldn't that be up to posters? Then you're the one confused, if you're seriously giving that as an example! Surely scholars and philosophers, and academia....wouldn't be wasting time for centuries debating about the Bible! Furthermore, what moron would be asking only heathens about religion? With a leading question, to boot? Furthermore - conspiracy theory, or not - issue about the Bible would certainly fall under Religion, wouldn't it? No question about that! I don't know the reason behind so much resistance about something so practical. Anyway.....I give up.

Duet: Blah-blah-blah. Gimme five!

Sanctions don't seem to work at all. Fat boy is a looney kid in defiant-mode. He doesn't care about his people. I think it just emboldens NK.

Every country has their share of whackos of all sorts! But your own citizen, is your own. Whatever the motivation to kill isn't the point: the point is the objective! If someone wants to kill lots of people - for whatever reason - that's a huge problem! Knowing what motivates them help a great deal since you know what to watch out for. Just because a member of a family had committed a crime does not justify that, therefore, your home becomes an open-house to everyone, nor should you be picky about whom you choose to come in! Even Karla Homolka can be choosy whom she wants to invite to her house!

I edited, btw. Which group is more deadly? That would be the outsider! He has no vested interest, and his allegiance/loyalty is questionable.

My mind is having a difficult time trying to absorb that. Must be the caffeine. Why would anyone use that for an argument, I can't imagine. Americans killing Americans - well, that's a homegrown problem! That would be like having a family member doing drugs, and comparing the havoc he creates within the family from a drug addict guest. Of course you're stuck with your family member. He's yours, and your own problem. The guest, on the other hand - you can just refuse to let him in your house. That's your right! Why would anyone want to add to their problem? It's not like as if there are no problems with suicide-murders, domestic murders, serial killers, and riots of all sorts! What rational mind would invite and import more? If you'd got Bernardo for a son, why invite the Manson family to live with you, too? What I do know is that when an Islamic terrorist commits murder - it's most likely going to be MULTIPLE MURDERS. Isn't that the objective? To kill as many as possible? All it takes is 1 terrorist to be successful in his mission of death - and that usually means more than one person killed, and several maimed. Anyway....maiming civilians does count, too! Imagine how many of these maimed civilians lose their productivity ( and standard of life), due to injuries? If you lose a leg, wouldn't that have an impact?

This latest move by European Union - which definitely shows you don't have sovereignty once you're a member - might shaken up other EU countries that are already having second thoughts about EU. http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/east-europe-cant-refuse-refugees-court/news-story/9e93570f20dc0b8210fb916ff4c21964 http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/839308/Migrant-crisis-Italian-MEP-refugee-arrivals-threaten-EU-future There were rumors before of Greece and France (before victory of Macron), to likely follow UK in leaving the EU. But so far, it seems no one else is making a move. There is an EU program to resettle migrants outside of EU. We're doing trade with EU, right? I wonder if any caveat of quota to fill, is part of that trade deal?

9/11? Never heard about folks anticipating being missiled - if terrorists had fat boy's type of missiles, they wouldn't be using planes! A lot of people fell for Y2K, though.

The news people at CBC and CTV are peeing in their pants! Out of excitement....or fear? I don't know.

HALLELUJAH! God bless you, folks.

Get in line. I bet Hot Enough's already got his number.

Look it up.

Clear as a blue sky in summer. Review our exchanges.

Awwww.....c'mon now. You can't slink yourself away........ You're among those who refuses to be prepared. So, naturally - you'll most likely be among the threats whom preppers will be gunning for!

No it's not. Illegal immigrants have been using our system against us! Who do you think pays for all the trials? And court appeals? And in the meantime, while we pay for their lawyers....who provides for welfare and healthcare? How many had gone underground and cannot be found to be deported?

There, that's the problem, Michael. I'm glad you finally admit it. Nothing wrong with making assumptions...... however, you can't really use it as an argument in the face of evidence that supports the contrary.

General Discussions can also include juvenile and incoherent postings. I mean, have you argued with a teen?

Maybe, the cooler.....? Like, 6 months? Let's see who survives that!

They are them!

You can't say it's the "bright side," if you don't know whether they're learning the system in a positive way! Besides......positive for who? From what we see.....looks like they're learning the system in a NEGATIVE way (for us), so they can take advantage of it and use it against us! Thus you see our courts tied up in litigations.......and we end up awarding millions of dollars to terrorists fighting alongside our enemies, who are killing our own soldiers!

Nationalists....are the people from the host country? Like in USA/Canada, that would be the European whitey folks?

Well......... .......I'm glad my smileys had finally drawn you out of that silly "hunger strike." Oh, such nonsense. You must be starving. Never underestimate the effect of betsy's smileys.

That's what I've been saying. How? If rights and freedom have already been so eroded, and scrapped? Besides, why wait until it comes? What happened to "prevention?" Assuming it's still our system that's in placed. But what if it's another kind of system? "Make them reflect on the broader wishes of the people." Oh, boy. Like when peddlers of democracy - or human rights - try to engage with the Talibans? Or, Communist China?