LinkSoul60

I see you're not a Carney fan... anyway, we've been trading with China and they've been investing here for decades and you think we need to stop that now....why? Doesn't matter whether it's China or India we have to be trading with them and the 3B people they have. Not sure the high and mighty thing works in the world these days.

Why do you always confused someone laughing at you as them crying... It's a feel good thing right. You're getting seriously strange in your last x amount of replies with every second paragraph being filled with your sexual connotations. Just like your emoji tongues.... you can keep those thoughts to yourself.

Whatever... 🤡

You'd be a great sample case subject for an aspiring physcologist...

We just said LNG is years late, but starting to happen now so it's a start there and TMX keeps growing so it's happening. I'm not a proponent for a Northern pipeline if the people that live there don't want it but the balls in Smith's and then Carney's court there to see if that project gets off the ground so things have obviously changed since Trudeau. Depending on how she's in there. Maybe, maybe not... It's not my thing and I'm happy to see my children didn't go down that road but the older I got the less I cared what others did. That's what politicians do...try to please the majority and appease the minority. Carney's got himself more than a handful from the Trudeau mess and Trump trying to break some of our industrial sectors but I'll wait before I say nothings going to improve. The obvious is that it has to happen but we have to find people to dance with to do it which is why the guys on a plane every second day. We need investment coming back into this country and we couldn't find a more qualified guy who knows which direction to go in the investment community than Carney. If not, we'll vote someone else in next election.

I'll surrender when you stop sending me emojis with your tongue hanging out... I'll even try to say you're smart and non-partisan.

Sure it is and not just exclusive to children. Young or old doesn't matter....critical thinking is or at least should be part of any decision you're going to make or opinion you're going to espouse. Of course younger generations have different narratives because they're living in a different regeneration and world than we did at that age. I don't know/care enough of the Palestine protests by university students so won't comment there, but climate change is unequivocal (you disagree with my opinion), and who cares or why should you care if a man wants to be a woman or a woman wants to be a man. It's their life (you also disagree with my opinion). I've thought critically of both these subjects as I'm sure you have but we have opinions that differ, same as the younger generations so-called absurd narratives. Haven't read a lot of reports or studies but I can see that. Again, it's a different world they live in with social media opening a universe of good and bad. Peer pressure or fitting in with the crowd isn't anything new for kids these days though. It's been that way forever. Totally agree. Facts and data should drive all opinions and/or decisions. As it relates to politicians though and in these divisive times it doesn't appear to matter one way or another if politicians lie as long as the jersey they're wearing is the same colour as mine. We're in an interesting spot with the what I believe to be very valid environmental concerns and the absolute need to have a sustainable economy. Unless we completely reinvent ourself which would take decades our logical and most obvious opportunities are with our natural resources while also building out cleaner forms of energy. The older I get though the more I want to see us do it in a responsible way and with that added tax/cost to corporate and citizen taxpayers. Easier for me to say though than a younger person/family trying to make ends meet. I hear you... Years late but we have one LNG project in operation with 7 more in various stages so we're heading down the right road.

You're not denying that you went off into unicorn questions are you?

Say again...? I could copy a couple more, but you get the point.... You said it and believe it so own it. I don't care if you're an unabashed Trump supporter.... but it is fun poking you on it from time to time. Posted 20 hours ago There is no evidence that Trump was involved in any trafficking or other crap with Epstein. What a pathetic liar you are. 19 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: Why can't you just stick to the subject at hand... files of accusations from a then underaged girl are now 'mysteriously missing'. Are you really that stupidly naive, or just don't give a damn because it's Trump? It's one or the other. I did stick to the subject at hand. Those files, even if missing, were never deemed credible enough to do anything with and you still have enough files released to know about it. The question is, are you really so desperate to hate Trump that you are going to pretend like the DOJ and everyone involved somehow covered up that interview and never did anything and the accuser through 2 presidential elections never bothered to come forward and say anything? Because nothing happened with them... duh. The person making them has not surfaced to make them publicly. Duh.

Teaching children critical thinking has been part of the education system, and in most households forever. One of the most important questions a child can ask is 'why' which helps develop their minds when receiving that answer. That said as we age we inherently develop our own biases based on our own life experiences. A so-called lie by you or I may not be seen that way by either of us which quashes the critical thinking thing as you or I would view it if we don't agree. Forums such as this is a good example of those biases whereas a child would probably look at most posts and shake their little heads.

What BS.... I'm asking how you know what the file details when they were not released. Just won't answer will you... embarrassing.

You started talking about unicorns and now I'm supposed to somehow respond to that.... not likely. I know you said there was no evidence so yet again.... How do you know that if the files haven't been released?

BS is exactly what he spews and why he's such an easy target to slag. Why are you so defensive for him?

Minimal saving for middle-income persons/families. Again, what did or do you expect? Better question....What would your idol Poilievre do....'axe the tax'?

I'll answer that when you tell me why you're so sure your idol is 100% innocent when the files that have gone missing have not been released.

There's a lot to criticize....like pretty much every time he opens his mouth.

So, you go off the rails because you know you can't answer the question but nonetheless need to defend your hero. That's fine...embarrassing and hilarious but if it doesn't bother you, keep rolling with it.

There are 80 IQ people out here...your point is what? I'll peg you lower than that if you can't tell me what makes a newcomer to Canada an authority on what immigration levels should be. Maybe the 4th time I've asked so last chance.... You should understand that immigration has been dialled back but that the levels required are determined by province in consultation with government and business to level set the labor force needed and demographic goals. Your belief that something sinister is going on to prop boomers home equity and lower wages doesn't carry any weight whatsoever. Huh..??? There is a ramp up in mining, LNG terminals, TMX, and our O&G industry has record breaking production. Beyond that we're trying to attract new investment for industry. Exactly who is being strangled right now because of environmental policies? If only he had your business, economic and environmental acumen....

It's absolutely priceless when you and other so-called Canadian's feel the need to defend everything Trump...priceless! Gets back to what I said earlier about your political bias and being a hack. Wipe your chin again....

Introduced the middle-class tax cut last year and the Canada groceries and essential benefit that starts in July. What did, or do you expect?

You are hands down the most uneducated and blatantly partisan hack imaginable! Because of your ignorant bias you somehow don't understand what the word 'deal' means. Calling you a clown doesn't do your foolishness justice, and isn't fair to clowns everywhere....

Try reading what you type sometime. You clearly melt down real easy when a fact is presented that you can't accept. Regarding your little back peddle on the affinity you have for sending emojis with your tongue hanging out.... very weird.

Half your house or personal possessions is from China. You want a pipeline to sell more oil to China, but for whatever the reason you and fellow crying lot think we shouldn't buy Chinese cars, despite the fact we're buying them today under the names of Volvo, Polestar and Buick. In denial about what? Trump said making the deal with China was good didn't he, but the his little minions had a problem with it because t takes away their leverage. End of the day we look after ourselves and don't need to listen to what Trump 'tells us to do'. I understand you think we should but like I said before, you appear to be the type that turtles easily. Nobody has said, suggested or even considered not trading with the US. Tow the line...lol, be serious....

Are you done and feel better after that? Now, answer the question I've asked multiple times.... How do you know that if the missing files were never released?

And again.... who cares if talks are stalled if we're not getting what they think should be on the table. Trump's getting more heat today with economic news around impact of tariffs which only helps us in trade talks. You're right though about him caring only for the US, which he should. Problem there though is that tariffs are a tax on US citizens. I agree it will eventually be communicated as good deal because he won't sign it unless it is. Maybe now that Poilievre has learned how to call Trump by name he can lend his great insight to help Carney navigate this?