User

We already have campaign finance regulations with limits. Those "oligarchs" do not donate 50 million a month to political campaigns. That is already against the law. They are donating their money to a PAC, where people combine their resources to support candidates and policy they like. You know... free speech. It would help first to understand what you are talking about.

How did they take the law into their own hands? It is already legal to help people with medical issues, to put out fires, to protect property. No laws were taken into their own hands. My mocking you for your inability to understand the difference between a man and a woman has nothing to do with my honesty or integrity. I am not the one lying about what a woman is, you are.

No, it doesn't. A religious person's entire world view is often centered on their faith, the fact that their morals, ethics, and views on the world are defined by their faith, doesn't mean they can't use those to build legal frameworks in our government.

What law was he enforcing? If you are reducing the definition of vigilante to anyone ever doing anything to protect themselves or others, then the term is meaningless. You do not need legal authority to help people or to act as security for property for others. No, it is your princess boyfriend with the fake vagina. Do you stop to help and if so are you a vigilante? If I thought for a moment you were a person worthy of any of that... maybe. You are not.

You don't need authority to help people. If you see someone on the side of the road hurt, do you just ignore them because you don't have authority to help or is it just because that is the kind of jer% you are? So... which was it? Do you know it is fake or do you really think it is real? Nothing weird about you collecting all my comments on this at all... LOL You brought it up, not sure why you are acting like you are bothered about it now.

Way to ignore the point... that you are wrong. The part of trying to enforce law without authority to do so... Speaking of c*nt, is that what you call your boyfriends fake vagina? Are you playing ignorant about your boyfriends fake vagina being real or do you really think it is one?

Good robot. As your programmers have told you, you made good use of the word. Will your princess boyfriend reward you now?

Perhaps you should stop cowardly hiding from me and lets see you if you can actually put up a real argument and defend it.

It is over there. It is on the wall. It is on the floor. It is all around us.

No, this is the first time you have brought up your pet name for your boyfriend.

No, not all private security must be "authorized" by the state. Private security is primarily regulated at the city level, if at all. No, yet again, that is not what makes someone a vigilante. You keep leaving out the key part of that definition. You are half right, you gave a definition, then just keep mindlessly asserting he is one. I guess you are back to playing ignorant again and don't know the definition.

Maybe this is your problem. Do you think your boyfriend is a princess too? LOL

The same way an entire industry of private security or people do on their own... everyone is a vigilante! No, you just keep asserting it as if it were true. It is not. It is lawful to carry firearms. It is lawful to help protect a business. Are you ever going to get to a point here?

Maybe if you spent more time educating yourself, you would be able to tell the difference between a fake vagina on your boyfriend and a real one.

Cleaning up vandalism in the community, helping people in need, putting out fires, helping protect a business... So, when will you get to the vigilantism you keep talking about? Yes, you asserted this again. You have yet to explain how. Well, beyond saying that apparently everyone in the world is a vigilante because they would help another person out with first aid, or help put out a fire...

Dear diary...

LOL, you have a lot of time to spew your ignorance on this forum daily. There is not enough time for you to educate yourself. Maybe you should rethink your priorities in life.

So, it's not vigilantism. Or, I guess to you, everytime someone gets a bandaid out for their kids boo boo, OMG, they are a vigilante!!! Let me help you out again, the issue is no longer the definition of Vigilante, it is your applying it to Rittenhouse. Do I need to draw that in crayon with pictures for you?

I bet she is smart enough to see that a shared video referencing the account of the person making it can easily be checked...

What cops job was he trying to do? The issue is not the definition anymore, try to keep up. It is you still baselessly asserting it applies to Rittenhouse. You asked what he was doing when he was defending himself, I told you. Did you not watch the videos?

So, you do understand what it means, then why are you saying Rittenhouse is a vigilante? He was not out trying to arrest people and bring them to some form of Rittenhouse justice. You are so desperate to defend these thugs. He was running away, trying to flee thugs chasing him down, threatening his life. It was one of the most well-videoed self-defense shootings I have ever seen. Did you miss those videos? Don't have to steal anything, look at how bent out of shape you are trying to defend these thugs.

Wow, its almost like you can see her TikTok account handle in the video and easily go to said account to verify this... ROFL Look who is a volunteer at the DNC:

Normal people understand the meaning of vigilante. Self-defense is just self-defense. Thanks for proving my point, though, as you are here crying over those thug's deaths.

You mean, the guys Democrats cried over being shot? LOL

You are the one who wants to criminalize speech and make religion against the law, yet you are here decrying your own treatment. Dude, look in the mirror. You are the people you hate. Yes, your core arguments about religion are absurd. You continually conflate illegal acts against others rights like rape, with someone practicing religion. That is not a fact, it is just bad argument, one you keep running away from. I am not the one cowering here.