User

Nope, you are. You still won't say what we are supposed to call a fake vagina, either. Seriously dude, these are your stupid arguments. You can't defend them, so you just run away.

How is that your big takeaway here?

Again, you brought this up because you think men can be women.

No lie Mr Men can have vaginas too...

You brought all this up, you have no one to blame here but yourself.

You are here pushing a lie that men can be women... and that they can even have fake vaginas too! Except, you get really mad about my calling them fake, but won't say what we should call your boyfriends fake vagina.

You can't grasp the difference between mockery and insults with lying... just like you can't tell the difference between a man pretending to be a woman with a fake vagina and a real woman.

He said that earlier, that this was a waste and they should have been sent to the front. (paraphrase) I just don't understand why he would be so against this as a waste, like sending them to the front like business as usual would have been better. Especially when his entire shtick on here is to harp on how much land Russia is grinding for... but now that Ukraine takes more land than Russia has done all year, that is a waste. But Russia taking another 10 meters somewhere is proof Russia is winning and will certainly win.

You brought it up, trying to defend your princess boyfriends fake vagina making him a "real" woman.

You brought this all on yourself trying to defend your absurd position that men pretending to be women are actually women. You further brought this on yourself being all butt hurt about calling a fake vagina, fake.

So, stop complaining about my calling it a fake vagina then. No, I literally said: "Rittenhouse was not there acting as any authority " Did you miss the "as" in the sentence? He was not there acting like law enforcement nor did he need any authority to be there. Typical liberal though, you folks are just fine with violent mobs of people out on the streets destroying business, support bailing them out when arrested, but are all upset because someone dared to help protect property.

Rittenhouse was not there acting as any authority to arrest and prosecute anyone. Glad we cleared this up. He was not a vigilante. You are the one who is all butt hurt about me calling your boyfriends fake vagina, fake. So, what should we call this fake vagina then?

But of course, that is exactly what he thinks Ukraine should have done... just throw those troops back onto the front somewhere... Some of the best strategy you can do in warfare is force your enemy to respond to you. Keep them having to guess and have to move resources around.

No, you are being dishonest. That bail fund was used for arrested protestors who were engaged in illegal activities including rioting. She made that tweet during that violence. That is quite obvious. She has had ample time to know and understand what that fund was used for, including bailing out that dude who went on to murder someone. Has she disavowed it? No. Hell, she won't even take real questions from the press right now.

Dear Lord... did you even read the article for crying out loud? Talk about a 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon hit piece.

Of course, you are an authoritarian who doesn't like free speech.

Operating outside of what parameters? Nope. Then every security guard, every homeowner, and everyone who protects property is a vigilante... You are the one upset about calling it fake... so what do you call your boyfriend's fake vagina?

Private citizens protect property all the time. It is not a cops job to protect everyone's property. They come out to enforce laws when they are broken and sometimes can be in some places to help deter or protect. It is why we have an entire industry dedicated to security. You don't need any special authority to protect property. So, again, he is not a vigilante. Come on now, you are the one making a big deal out of calling a fake vagina fake, so what do you call it? No, you wanted us to know men can have fake vagina's too. You seem to have a lot of experience with fake vaginas.

No, you just posted the definition and said he met it. This specific discussion point started with your absurd comment that he acted outside of the law... but you can't say how. So, what do you call your boyfriend's fake vagina? You wanted the forum to know all about this.

Yes, it is. You don't bother explaining why... you just assert he is a vigilante because he is a vigilante. No, I have been calling them fake this whole time. However, I can see you are really sensitive about what we call your boyfriends fake vagina. So, what do you call it then, unnatural vagina? LOL You seem pretty worked up about what we call this fake vagina for it to be fictional.

Oh man, all those same people use the same religious foundations to think killing 5-year-old kids is wrong, too. So, we better make that lawful now. Seriously, are you in such a death cult worshipping the slaughter of unborn children that this is your go-to response in regard to a general discussion on religious worldviews and law?

So, circular argument again... So, you think a transwoman's vagina is real? ROFL Your boyfriend is your princess and you are suspending reality to make that fake vagina real for you...

So, another circular argument... he is a vigilante because he is a vigilante. Those are all lawful things to do within the law. Imaginary?! This was you: "Transwomen can have vaginas dummy."

So, what was the point in your using it then? So, what was done outside of the law here? So... you think your boyfriend with a fake vagina is totally a legit woman... but according to you I am the freak for pointing out how stupid that is... *eye roll* I get it; you are not obsessed with your boyfriend's fake vagina being fake, you think it is real.

You don't have to be a NATO signatory for the Russian aggression and expansion to be of concern to NATO... or in the interest of NATO to oppose.