User

Yes. In fact it is. Democrats have supported and continue to support the open borders lawlessness that has led us to millions of people being here illegally. ICE is enforcing the law much more strictly now. In that they are not ignoring a ton of people breaking the law. Nope. Those on the left also push their racism and racist policies to this day.

What is it you think I should admit to being wrong about here? You were the one lying about what Trump said. I provided you a link to what he actually said, then you stupidly tried to claim you don’t trust the source. I can’t make up the level of stupid you are engaged in here.

Also a bit hypocritical… The point being, what you are doing is stupid.

LOL, you are the one convinced Russia… RUSSIA! Is right. FFS where is a facepalm big enough… 1. This makes no sense in response to me, as you are the one who was normalizing countries aggression towards others while I was not. 2. This is a distraction and bad argument. You are making a broad hasty generalization about Canada/America… which has nothing to do with the point you made or my response to it. My comments were not based on trusting anyone. 3. Aggressive… how? I can be aggressive at ordering my coffee at Starbucks, so what? 4. I didn’t quote either of those sources.

Yes, this is my thoughts on what you are posting. WTF are you talking about?

“Small part of that journey”

Another lazy spambot thread from @robosmith…

I don’t care what you buy. The facts show Putin/Russia launched a full scale invasion attempt from multiple fronts meant to overwhelm and conquer Ukraine very quickly. They got bogged down trying to encircle Kiev and were getting cut off from their logistics. If they didn’t pull back, it would have been catastrophic to their operations. You can sit here playing these dishonest games about not knowing their motives and presuming to think they were something else, and I will focus on the facts. You tell me. This is your new dumb claim. Show us what exactly this dude said you are talking about.

I’m not the one creating threads every day with nothing more than a link to a Facebook video. That is you Pointing out that you are posting BS is just that.

“Evidence of” is a phrase meant to characterize what you are doing… you didn’t have to literally say evidence. Just like you are continuing to do now as you list out “evidence” to back up your assertion. If your argument is that he should have better and more important things to do… OK. That isn’t a mental issue argument. Asking me a question isn’t supporting your case. It’s not my job to disprove the assertion you can’t back up with any real evidence or good argument.

What does any of this have to do with the price of tea in China? What does this have to do with you trying to say it is increasingly overrated? As the Constitution has always been like this. Which again, what does that have to do with anything here? Literally anything people do is going to be based on the people doing it… you have not described any problem other than people, which applies to literally anything.

Oh wow… and here is what ChatGPT said about what you are doing: It sounds like this person is using the number of posts as a weapon to attack someone’s character, essentially implying that anyone who posts frequently must have a shallow or unbalanced life. But honestly, it’s a pretty reductive and judgmental view. The number of posts someone makes on a forum can be influenced by a ton of different factors—maybe they’re passionate about the issues being discussed, or they just like the community, or they even find it a helpful outlet to stay engaged with ideas and events. But to automatically tie that behavior to someone being "dysfunctional" or "empty" is overly simplistic and misses the complexity of how people use online spaces. What’s frustrating here is that they seem to be projecting their own assumptions onto others—probably without recognizing that they, too, are deeply invested in the forum. If they’re arguing with people about their posting habits while consistently participating, they’re in a way doing the same thing! It’s almost like they’re trying to defend their own level of engagement while criticizing others, which can come off as hypocritical.

ROFL How pathetic. A better man would just admit he was lying.

You are here lying about what the administration said. My posting a link to what they said IS the refutation. This is the most reliable source in regards to refuting your lies. You: Trump said X Me: No, you are a liar, here is a link to what he actually said You: DURRRRRRRRRRRRR i DoNt CoNsIdEr WhAt TrUmP sAyS aS rEliAbLe DURRRRRRRRRRRRRR

You just posting random incoherent thoughts now?

It helps if you try to be honest. The administration laid out this publicly for all to see and yet you still have to lie. The reason wasn’t just “fentanyl” like you claim here. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/designating-cartels-and-other-organizations-as-foreign-terrorist-organizations-and-specially-designated-global-terrorists/

No, you are not. I gave you a response to your dishonest post above… you ignored all that. This behavior is all you have left.

What are you, a 3rd grader or something?

They sent a second strike to finish off the craft. This was approved by JAG and decisions made by the command on the battlefield. It’s no more murder than if a bomber in WW2 circled back around to finish off a Nazi fuel dump that still had a tank standing and you are crying because there were still a few Nazis alive. You continue the same dumb obtuse argument I have already refuted before, as if Drugs magically appear on a non stop flight from the jungles of Venezuela to the door step of a junkie in Chicago.

It’s so predictable watching you act this way. You have no real substance to offer.

No, it hasn’t. You asserting it has doesn’t make it so. Which is why you are still not offering any fact based argument.

No. We reject your assertion. You can’t offer a compelling fact based argument to support calling it murder.

Still BS. Feel free to respond to my comments then… No, this is an illogical deduction, that somehow a lack of new aid packages now = support for Russia. This is a measurement of aid packages passed, not the actual support. The US continues to provide support to Ukraine from previously passed funding packages that were designed to cover this year into 2026. You are not an honest person with how you selectively present facts like this to try to support your already flawed premise.

Yes, we get examples of it from you daily.

1. The fact that other nations have acted with violence against other to take what is not theirs, doesn't make it "normal" as if it is OK and should just be shrugged off and acceptable behavior. 2. First, even "if" they did, it is entirely irrelevent, as that doesn't somehow give them any right to do so or make Russia invading OK 3. Ukraine was fighting against the seperatists who were backed by Russia as well as outright Russian military there backing them. 4. No, that is not how a war is started at all. This is you coming up with a lame excuse to justify Russia starting a war against Ukraine. NATO is a defensive alliance. You just repeat your same stupid crap over and over again.