gatomontes99

But that isnt a double standard. That is the standard. Liberals can't be questioned and no question is ever in need of proof if it is asked of a conservative.

Did she have to? If she hadn't, would you not be making excuses for her? Of course you would. She could have dropped 20 N bombs and you would find an excuse.

Wow. You read nothing on his post.

You guys really dont get sarcasm, do you? Do you not hear the change in his voice? The chuckle? Ok, ill explain it. He's saying they are sending all these mentally ill people, on par with Hannible, to our country. And he's sarcastically calling them great because his point is that it is horrific. Come on. Just learn how to listen.

He won't have to apologize.

I was going to say that.

Scotus said the POTUS can't just forgive debt: https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-biden-student-loan-forgiveness-program/ Whitehouse suppressed free speech: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2023/09/08/biden-administration-coerced-facebook-court-rules/70800723007/ Prosecutors visiting whitehouse: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-met-with-biden-admin-before-3-trump-indictments/ar-BB1irUaf Prosecuter in NY came from DOJ: Matthew Colangelo https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/22/nyregion/trump-prosecution-hush-money-trial.html Quod Erat Demonstrandum

Lol, so you made upna perjury charge and asserted it like fact? Yeah. Ok. Who is FOS lies? Seriously. How about CNN: CNN via Msn.com "However, Honig said the cross-examination was “disastrous” for the prosecution: But the cross-exam, boy. Her responses were disastrous. I mean, “Do you hate Donald Trump?” “Yes.” Of course, she does. That’s a big deal. When the witness hates the person whose liberty is at stake, that’s a big damn deal! And she’s putting out tweets, fantasizing about him being in jail. That really undermines the credibility. The fact that she owes him $500,000 by order of a court, owes Donald Trump a half million dollars, and said, “I will never pay him. I will defy a court order,” the defense is gonna say, “She’s willing to defy a court order. She’s not willing to respect an order from a judge. Why is she gonna respect this oath she took? So, I thought it went quite poorly on cross-exam."

Perjury? What perjury was that? Everyone is saying Stormy torpedoed the case. The next question the defense is going to asking is to the "fixer" and they are going to ask "Mr. Cohen, were you lying then or now?" Cohen has no credibility. Next week, the NDA case will fail. The documents case has already failed, when Fani gets dismissed from the GA case it will also fail and that will leave the bogus fraud suit that is now under serious jeopardy. The banana republic is starting to tumble. The democratic republic and justice system are starting to prevail. As in every movie, the bad guys got to a crescendo that looked insurmountable and then lost spectacularly.

There is definitely an irony in calling Trump a dictator while supportung Joe Biden, who is ignoring rulings from the SCOTUS, actively suppressing free speech and persecuting his chief political rival.

China's military confronts US ship in South China Sea Spending a bunch of resources in Ukraine and Israel might be a huge mistake. Thus thing with China might get out of hand and it might get out of hand because we spent our resources in Ukraine and Israel.

Love every second of it. Sounds like utopia. Oh, they know what they are doing. They are trying to get the base so scared that someone will be crazy enough to kill Trump. And if that doesn't happen, then they have the basis for doing anything necessary to invalidate the election. Just like they did after 2016. The ends justify the means.

I'm sure (as the resident "prove it with a link, that I approve of, or I'll mock you" poster) you have definitive proof that Trump paid this lawyer for these allegations?

I hope he does every last bit of it.

"I actually had the ability to speak to him three weeks ago," Bailey said, during an on-camera interview with NBC New York on Feb. 16, the day the judge's decision was due. "I saw him in the corner [at the courthouse] and I told my client, 'I need to go.' And I walked over and we started talking … I wanted him to know what I think and why…I really want him to get it right." "No ex parte conversation concerning this matter occurred between Justice Engoron and Mr. Bailey or any other person. The decision Justice Engoron issued February 16 was his alone, was deeply considered, and was wholly uninfluenced by this individual,” said Al Baker, a spokesman for the New York State's Office of Court Administration, in a written statement The New York State Rules of Judicial Conduct state that "a judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties or their lawyers." The rules do allow an exception to "obtain the advice of a disinterested expert," if a judge gives notice to the parties in the case and gives them the opportunity to respond. If this ends up being true, it could void the entire case.

Do it!

Best I can tell, that is real.

I don't need to say anything. Just watch and vote for Trump: https://x.com/FindingMoneyDoc/status/1786050601236779078

Classic anti-anti-communist. Biden has cognitive decline and the reaction is defensive. Kennedy has cognitive decline to a lesser degree and the reaction is offensive. The key is that they have to defend the hive. Contradictions aren't contradictions to them.

It also matters because there is an allegation that some of the boxes were sent by mistake. If they hadn't been gone through, then it clearly was unknown by the president and his staff that they had what they had. If Jack Smith rearranged the boxes to make it look like they had been seen, that would be his fraudulent attempt to add a layer to the case. Something the SCOTUS has accused him of doing in the past.

The tape exonerated the President. He demanded they find the votes. Not create them. Find them. Case over. And I have disputed the facts in a different thread. I even showed you how the President is in charge of monitoring elections. You have nothing. Bragg has nothing. Smith planted something. Your fantasies are all falling apart. It's over.

There is no there there...but ok, you believe that. After the Stormy testimony and the Jack Smith debacle yesterday, Fani would do herself a favor to drop the charges and runaway. As for Trump, he's coming up roses. If he goes to jail, election is over. Trump wins in a landmark landslide and the Ds will have that mug shot and in jail photo hung around their neck for decades. If he wins his court cases, he will gain millions of votes. If he loses, there will be no change. The Democrats f'd up bad.

NBC News GA has granted a hearing to review if Fani should be dismissed from the Trump case.

Thats why we need a Trump like leader. We can't have a Tim Scott right now. We need someone that hits back.

I just ate an Elk burger stuffed with pork chorizo. I'm glad the 2nd Amendment hasn't been completely invalidated yet. Because if they try to take my red meat, they will have hell to pay.