gatomontes99

Oh he was soooo ethical? Bullshit. He had a story and his greedy ass published the story. If it is classified information, as you say, then he stole and disseminated that information for money. At the minimum he violated laws about classified information. At worst, he committed treason.

Let's talk about out the untouched topic here. If Goldberg thought he was seeing classified information: Why didn't he notify those in the chat and leave? Why did he keep screenshots? It seems to me that Goldberg used the opportunity of this mistake to gather information he thought he wasn't allowed to have with the intent of disseminating that information to the public. That would be a major violation of federal law. The fact that he was wrong about it being classified is immaterial. He intended to keep classified information and sell it via his magazine.

Who would have thought that having an anti-american ideology, embracing mental instability, eliminating borders, driving up the cost of living and lowering the value of wages all while bringing us to the brink of WWIII, censoring citizens, arresting political enemies, sponsoring terrorists and denying the President had lost his shit when we could all see it would have ruined the brand?

Can you find something that doesn't exist? And you didn't answer my question. WTF did you get that someone had to be in intelligence to violate someone else's rights?

You are so far off base that you aren't even in the stadium. Why do you have this false belief that you have the be in surveillance to violate someone's rights?

His Cali government told him so. So he repeats it. I think they've also listed clean water and air as carcinogenic.

Good gawd man. Read for comprehension.

It's time for us to understand that we can't keep voting for skin-folk that aren't our kinfolk.

You know that Adam Shitforbrains colluded with Russians to get naked pictures of Trump? And don't forget that the DOJ has stated that Schiff lied about the Russian hoax. They have evidence of that:

Stuff is getting real now folks. The left thought they were cute with their banana republic b.s. Now that table is turned and they are in the cross hairs. Good luck.

Weird how you lied about that. First article: Least Trusted News Source in the world behind by sister's friend's cousin

What a perfect example of rule number five. You consider facts to be a positive term. These facts fit in as a negative for your viewpoint. Therefore, they can't be facts in your mind. But they are facts. They are facts about her viewpoints that she is bringing to the organization. An organization that has been accused of having a bias towards one side of the political spectrum. Reviewing her statements to determine whether or not she holds a political bias is not a lie or irrelevant.

Rule #1

Should there be 27 Chief Information Officers in the DHS?

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5218847-meet-the-doge-team/ Proves he is lying.

Honest personal question. What part of the spectrum are you on?

Why are you so concerned with everyone else's lies when you've been caught lying so many times?

I thought I was blocked?

The beat part of this video is the reactions of Gill to her answers. "Ummm....yes you did." Just cracks me up every time.

Most Trusted news in all of the known and unknown universes! As usual, when the light of truth is exposed, all the media memes turn to dust. They said the DOGE team was nothing but a bunch of kids. Reality: they are successful CEOs that have a ton of financial knowledge. They said your social security is getting cut. Reality: they are updating the software and integrating multiple systems to prevent fraud and free up money to increase benefits. My favorite line came from Musk. He said something like he learned from PayPal that the people that scream the loudest and complain the most when you make things more secure is the fraudsters. Funny how the left is screaming and complaining very loudly.

Lmao...wow...the schilling for communists is just unashamed.

What are they mad about? It's the truth. I guess what they are mad about is the changing mindset. We used to be the enforcer for everything and now we are actually weighing the cost v benefit. What a horror?! No. Actually, that's not a horror. That's practical. In the end, it was a good message to send because they did attack our ships.

Oh really? No one is reporting on it? https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/national-international/jasmine-crockett-mock-gov-greg-abbott/3663005/ https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/25/politics/video/van-jones-crocketts-hot-wheels-insult-is-wrong-move-for-dems YouTube and NBC https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1072830334882917&id=100064678808576 https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/latest/jasmine-crockett-texas-governor-greg-abbott-disability-rcna198147 I mean, seriously. Why do you lie when it is so verifiable false?

Your opinion is based on your radical assumption that if it is government it is good and necessary. Your assumptions are wrong. The EPA can have a good goal and do good things while at the same time have wasteful and harmful aspects. Making changes and/or cuts isn't necessarily bad.