reason10

The facts are pretty consistent. Liberals and NAZIS embrace the IDENTICAL ideology and tactics. They are a mirror image.

This fraudulent indictment is the SAME tactic as those two illegal impeachments. This is a CAMPAIGN strategy by NAZIS who know that (a) there's NO FCKING WAY Biden won that election, and (b) Biden would CERTAINLY lose it in 24. That's all this is. And you NAZIS are all for it, just like your predecessors had no problem with six million JEWS being exterminated. Seig Heil.

In the last election, LEGAL voters decided NOTHING. Voter fraud picked that senile Nazi Pedophile.

Nope. It was National Socialist. Mussolini's government was FASCIST. (just like today's Democrats.)

Name them. Provide a link that isn't that pedophile THE VIEW. Or admit you just don't fcking know. Their desire to pander ONLY TO CHILDREN. They aren't going to retirement homes to read to old people who cannot see. They are concentrating on CHILDREN. The media labeled Michael Jackson a pedophile with a LOT LESS EVIDENCE THAN THAT. Those freaks are PEDOPHILES. They should not be allowed anywhere NEAR children.

What you’re saying is extremely offensive. You should educate yourself as to the nature of the killings of unarmed black citizens by police. Blacks kill more blacks than police do. And you really don't have any reliable numbers of the LAWFUL killings versus the UNLAWFUL killings. There are strict laws regarding when a police officer can shoot someone, and generally it is when someone’s life is in danger. “Stop or I’ll shoot” is not a lawful use of a weapon. You've been watching too many Sixties movies. Produce PROOF that even ONE officer in the year 2023 has every used those exact words, or admit you are making this up. Michael Brown was walking home after buying a bag of Skittles when a man with a gun shot and killed him. Michael Brown assaulted a police officer, who fired in self defense. If you're thinking of Trayvon Martin, the little animal ATTACKED George Zimmerman, who used deadly force for self defense. Black people are well aware that these shootings have been going on for over a century. It is only with the emergence of the cell phone video camera that these violations are being recorded. That is a LIE. Black shootings increase when blacks began committing more CRIMES, you m0ron. In the 40s, 50s, and early 60s, black families were intact. Blacks weren't committing the violent crimes back then that they do now. It was the DemoNazi welfare state that broke up black families, with 75 percent of ALL black children today living in a single parent home. That creates gangs and crime. Thank Lyndon Johnson and other Demo RACISTS for what happened. Don't blame police officers for defending themselves when a black animal decides to attack. Face it, you're just a pathetic blue state RACIST.

That's a lie and you're a LIAR. Trump violated no laws, except making retards like you cry. Crawl under your rock, TROLL.

You did not comment on my definition. YOU LIED AND LIED AND LIED.

You are a LIAR and a STUPID LIAR at that. There has NEVER been (in the entire history of human action) a pure Laisse Faire Free Market Capitalism. America has come close, but NAZI SYMPATHIZERS like you made it impossible.

I AM sticking with the facts. Left wingers ARE NAZIS. Same ideology. Same tactics.

Wokeness AND lousy tasting beer? Talk about a one-two punch!

Any time the government helps the people, conservatives attack it and call it socialism. That is a lie and he is a LIAR for saying that. The Wall Street Journal called Henry Ford a "traitor to his class" when he introduced the $5 day. And with all of their blather about Adam Smith they don't point out that Smith mentioned 'education' Eighty Times and wrote "read, write and account". Both Smith and that WSJ writer are DEAD. The times they lived in no longe exist. It doesn't mean necessarily that their theories are wrong. You and other goose steppers continue to push the policies of KKKarl Marx, even as his system has been proven WRONG by history. When the OP says that I am off topic I will think about it. You can just STFU! Of course with your delusions of intellectual adequacy I am sure that won't happen, so continue entertaining me. LOL Here's the thing: I'm just offering an opinion here, same as everyone else. I may have a better set of facts than the goose stepping liberals here (mostly because they have NO facts at all) but I proceed on the assumption that we are all debating on the same page, the SAME topic. The stuff you are throwing out there is irrelevant to the topic of this thread (which I'll freely admit is very stupid, not surprising since it was created by a very stupid poster). You may not like that your forays into other topics are irrelevant. You need to know that I sleep wonderfully at night not worrying what entitled, easily triggered, uneducated goose steppers like you feel. In the end, nobody at this forum is losing any money on the deal, assuming this isn't cutting into working hours. (You assume that for the mainstream conservatives here, since the liberals are all on welfare and food stamps and have all the time in the world to shove their bullshit in our faces.) In other words, this place is as important as you are. Which isn't saying much. And your idi0tic temper tantrums reveal a lot about your lack of maturity and education, but they don't make you special. I sub occasionally for special ed classes in public schools so I know the difference. You aren't special. Just boring.

Maybe MAGA conservatives, but the above aren't conservative ideals. You apparently care more about slogans than you do about reality. There is no such thing as MAGA conservatives. There are merely mainstream conservatives (who make up most of America and who reelected President Trump in a second landslide, only to have that election overturned by voter fraud.) What is it about Make America Great Again that has gotten your pink panties into such an uproar? Woke! OMG! Woke! Woke! CRT! It’s the most important thing to stop! Books! We have got to take books away from children! Drag Shows! They will destroy our children! Woke is modern day liberalism (which pretty much means goose stepping National Socialism, just like the Third Reich. Woke individuals are ignorant, uneducated, entitled and intolerant, just like their KKK predecessors. Just as those Nazis bash conservatives like Reagan, Limbaugh, etc, we conservatives bash those Nazis. ) CRT is RACIST. It is a lie. It is as important to stop as the KKK, Slavery, JIm Crow Laws, etc. If you believe RACISM shouldn't be stopped, YOU'RE a racist. Nobody wants to take books away from children except for PORN, which is what blue state schools are currently pushing. Do you think a CHILD should be allowed to read explicit PORN? If that's the case, you're a pedophile. Drag shows are PEDOPHILE shows. Why not just let registered sex offenders work at daycare centers while we're at it.

Do you notice what these issues all have in common? They don’t matter one iota! Conservatives whip their followers up into frenzies over books they’ve never read, legal concepts they don’t understand, and shows they’ve never been to… and convince them that those things are the most urgent issues in America! You don't think protecting children from PEDOPHILES is important? That is perhaps because your side of the aisle CHAMPIONS pedophelia, child pornography and child trafficking. What matters are jobs, and healthcare, and quality education. Building and maintaining roads. Social Security for retirees. Conservatives have an answer for all of these things: Budget Cuts. You as usual have NO idea what you are talking about. Two thirds of the federal budget are ENTITLEMENTS. Their budgets have NEVER been cut and CANNOT be cut without an act of Congress that overturns baseline budgeting (something Nixon signed into law.) So two thirds of the federal budget (which by the way are TRANSFER PAYMENTS) have never been cut and cannot be cut by law. President Reagan tried cutting their rate of yearly increase and was crucified by the Nazi media. Any budget cutting would be in that 36 percent that is left, which means cutting into spending where the taxpayer gets value for his/her taxes. (Military, roads, government salaries, court systems, police, prison systems, etc) Conservatives believe that the ONLY way to prevent a complete meltdown of the economy (which the Kerrey Danforth Report predicted would occur in 2030) would be to END baseline budgeting and go to HONEST means tested budgeting. But you goose steppers don't want to give up that power. Every single Western nation has a form of centralized healthcare except for the United States. Yet the WHOLE WORLD comes to the United States for cancer treatment because our market based system has provided for the greatest advancements in medical breakthroughs. All centralized healthcare has done is make it more expensive. As usual, you are wrong on every count. You obviously were socially promoted through a blue state school, because you don't know anything.

The use of the term "Nazi" is strategic. (Not just an accurate description of liberalism today). Establish that liberals are Nazis up front (which is accurate) or they'll lose an argument and call the winner a Nazi. I head off that idi0tic tactic with facts. The only thing that makes an argument weak is the lack of facts. My arguments are facts.

Actually, leftism IS cancer. Leftism cannot survive on its own as an ideology. It needs host cells to occupy and devour, just as leukemia takes over healthy body cells.

You're moving away from the subject of the thread. Socialism is defined as government ownership and control of all the means of production. The original idi0t who created this thread tried to accuse conservatives of calling all government spending socialism. I pointed out that he was wrong. As far as macroeconomics goes, governments DO spend money. The perfect Libertarian model is for government to spend ONLY for the legitimate functions of government. And libertarians believe in taxation to pay for the legitimate functions of government. Some may disagree as to what is legitimate, and some who lack an education might suggest spending for something that is not legitimate is socialism. I'm looking more in broad strokes here. As far as lacking the brains, you might want to find the thread that echoes the state of mind you're in, or create your own thread. This thread is not about algebra, depreciation from wear and tear, or physics. This is about a mor0nic accusation from a blue state liberal who has the brains of a gerbil. Apples and oranges. You're moving away from the subject of the thread. Socialism is defined as government ownership and control of all the means of production. The original idi0t who created this thread tried to accuse conservatives of calling all government spending socialism. I pointed out that he was wrong. As far as macroeconomics goes, governments DO spend money. The perfect Libertarian model is for government to spend ONLY for the legitimate functions of government. And libertarians believe in taxation to pay for the legitimate functions of government. Some may disagree as to what is legitimate, and some who lack an education might suggest spending for something that is not legitimate is socialism. I'm looking more in broad strokes here. As far as lacking the brains, you might want to find the thread that echoes the state of mind you're in, or create your own thread. This thread is not about algebra, depreciation from wear and tear, or physics. This is about a mor0nic accusation from a blue state liberal who has the brains of a gerbil. Apples and oranges. You're moving away from the subject of the thread. Socialism is defined as government ownership and control of all the means of production. The original idi0t who created this thread tried to accuse conservatives of calling all government spending socialism. I pointed out that he was wrong. As far as macroeconomics goes, governments DO spend money. The perfect Libertarian model is for government to spend ONLY for the legitimate functions of government. And libertarians believe in taxation to pay for the legitimate functions of government. Some may disagree as to what is legitimate, and some who lack an education might suggest spending for something that is not legitimate is socialism. I'm looking more in broad strokes here. As far as lacking the brains, you might want to find the thread that echoes the state of mind you're in, or create your own thread. This thread is not about algebra, depreciation from wear and tear, or physics. This is about a mor0nic accusation from a blue state liberal who has the brains of a gerbil. Apples and oranges. You're moving away from the subject of the thread. Socialism is defined as government ownership and control of all the means of production. The original idi0t who created this thread tried to accuse conservatives of calling all government spending socialism. I pointed out that he was wrong. As far as macroeconomics goes, governments DO spend money. The perfect Libertarian model is for government to spend ONLY for the legitimate functions of government. And libertarians believe in taxation to pay for the legitimate functions of government. Some may disagree as to what is legitimate, and some who lack an education might suggest spending for something that is not legitimate is socialism. I'm looking more in broad strokes here. As far as lacking the brains, you might want to find the thread that echoes the state of mind you're in, or create your own thread. This thread is not about algebra, depreciation from wear and tear, or physics. This is about a mor0nic accusation from a blue state liberal who has the brains of a gerbil. Apples and oranges. You're moving away from the subject of the thread. Socialism is defined as government ownership and control of all the means of production. The original idi0t who created this thread tried to accuse conservatives of calling all government spending socialism. I pointed out that he was wrong. As far as macroeconomics goes, governments DO spend money. The perfect Libertarian model is for government to spend ONLY for the legitimate functions of government. And libertarians believe in taxation to pay for the legitimate functions of government. Some may disagree as to what is legitimate, and some who lack an education might suggest spending for something that is not legitimate is socialism. I'm looking more in broad strokes here. As far as lacking the brains, you might want to find the thread that echoes the state of mind you're in, or create your own thread. This thread is not about algebra, depreciation from wear and tear, or physics. This is about a mor0nic accusation from a blue state liberal who has the brains of a gerbil. Apples and oranges. You're moving away from the subject of the thread. Socialism is defined as government ownership and control of all the means of production. The original idi0t who created this thread tried to accuse conservatives of calling all government spending socialism. I pointed out that he was wrong. As far as macroeconomics goes, governments DO spend money. The perfect Libertarian model is for government to spend ONLY for the legitimate functions of government. And libertarians believe in taxation to pay for the legitimate functions of government. Some may disagree as to what is legitimate, and some who lack an education might suggest spending for something that is not legitimate is socialism. I'm looking more in broad strokes here. As far as lacking the brains, you might want to find the thread that echoes the state of mind you're in, or create your own thread. This thread is not about algebra, depreciation from wear and tear, or physics. This is about a mor0nic accusation from a blue state liberal who has the brains of a gerbil. Apples and oranges. You're moving away from the subject of the thread. Socialism is defined as government ownership and control of all the means of production. The original idi0t who created this thread tried to accuse conservatives of calling all government spending socialism. I pointed out that he was wrong. As far as macroeconomics goes, governments DO spend money. The perfect Libertarian model is for government to spend ONLY for the legitimate functions of government. And libertarians believe in taxation to pay for the legitimate functions of government. Some may disagree as to what is legitimate, and some who lack an education might suggest spending for something that is not legitimate is socialism. I'm looking more in broad strokes here. As far as lacking the brains, you might want to find the thread that echoes the state of mind you're in, or create your own thread. This thread is not about algebra, depreciation from wear and tear, or physics. This is about a mor0nic accusation from a blue state liberal who has the brains of a gerbil. Apples and oranges. You're moving away from the subject of the thread. Socialism is defined as government ownership and control of all the means of production. The original idi0t who created this thread tried to accuse conservatives of calling all government spending socialism. I pointed out that he was wrong. As far as macroeconomics goes, governments DO spend money. The perfect Libertarian model is for government to spend ONLY for the legitimate functions of government. And libertarians believe in taxation to pay for the legitimate functions of government. Some may disagree as to what is legitimate, and some who lack an education might suggest spending for something that is not legitimate is socialism. I'm looking more in broad strokes here. As far as lacking the brains, you might want to find the thread that echoes the state of mind you're in, or create your own thread. This thread is not about algebra, depreciation from wear and tear, or physics. This is about a mor0nic accusation from a blue state liberal who has the brains of a gerbil. Apples and oranges.

You are SERIOUSLY comparing a bunch of cross dressing freaks with ALL churches? Are you accusing ALL religious leaders of being pedophiles, based on the actions of a few Catholic priests? And where is your PROOF that all religions leaders are pedophiles? Are you saying Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton are pedophiles? If one black man commits a murder are you going to judge ALL blacks, and call them ALL murderers? Is that how it works? To answer your very dishonest question, ANY religious leader who commits any sore of sex crime involving a child should be arrested and charged, and NEVER allowed within a MILE of any church or school. But I do not judge ALL churches by the actions of a few. There might be cross dressers who live normal lives and practice their sick lifestyle in private. The pedophile freaks who openly invite children to join their freak show are criminals. I don't judge all sick cross dressers for the actions of the ones in the new Bud Light event. If they leave children alone, they shouldn't be on anyone's radar.

You don't even know what socialism is. You have the education of a Florida third grader. Socialism is NOT a political term so much as it is a design of government. There is left wing Nazi liberalism in America. We've seen plenty of that with the blue state inner city ghettos. (Modern plantations for the new generation of black SLAVES for the DemoNazi Party). America is a Republican Democracy with probably the most prevalent free market economy in the world. A Socialist model would be Venezuela, and pretty soon your goose stepping DemoNazis are going to convert this great country into this. THAT'S socialism. It is a form of government that equalizes the misery everywhere. There are pockets of that kind of HELL in America, (all in blue states.)

So far, you have given ZERO facts. Only opinions. I have provided reliable sources for my views. You have not. You don't have the brains to do that. The closest free market capitalism has come to being a daily reality was the Reagan years and the Trump years. During each time, America enjoyed the GREATEST expansion of the economy and the best prosperity for everyone involved. They were the two GREATEST presidents of all time.

You keep trying to change the subject. This thread is not about math. It is about some LIAR accusing mainstream conservatives of calling all government spending socialism.

Soon, there won’t be any products for insecure bigoted a-holes to buy. Boo Hoo. The bigoted RACIST a-holes are all on YOUR side of the aisle. It isn't bigotry to want to protect children from PEDOPHILES. Like… do you want your children to see the j side of bars that Bud advertises in? If you don’t want your kids to see gay pride festivals, don’t take them. Seems pretty easy to me. I didn’t take my kids inside biker bars, either. Or gay bars. Or any bars. Easy! Inviting children to a queer/pedophile pride event is a sex crime. Those queers should be arrested. And they should NOT be permitted to be around children AT ALL. Same thing for sex offenders who are prohibited from being within 100 yards of a public school. Pedophiles are criminals. PERIOD.

You sure it isn't KY Jelly?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/missouri-gov-mike-parsons-signs-bill-banning-transgender-health-care-minors-competition-school-sports Missouri Gov. Mike Parson signs bill banning transgender health care for minors, competition in school sports Starting Aug. 28, Missouri health care providers won't be able to prescribe sex change surgeries for teens and children. Most adults will still have access to transgender health care under the law, but it won’t be covered under Medicaid. "Today, in an effort to protect the integrity of female sports and Missouri children from potentially harmful experimental surgeries and treatment, I have signed Senate Bill (SB) 39 and SB 49 into law." As an added attraction, boys can no longer compete in girls' sports. Missouri Gov. Mike Parson on Wednesday signed a pair of bills into law banning transgender health care for minors and restricting athletes’ participation in sports to teams that match their biological sex. In signing the bill, the Republican governor said Missouri was standing up "to the nonsense" and stands with women and girls who have "fought for an equal opportunity to succeed." In other words, no more of this.

Directly from the I'M NOT MAKING THIS SHIT UP stack. https://www.foxnews.com/media/bud-light-co-sponsoring-all-ages-drag-show-party-safe-space-family-festival-event Bud Light is co-sponsoring an 'all-ages' drag show party: 'Safe space' 'family festival event' Despite tumbling sales and negative press coverage as a result of its partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney, Bud Light is reportedly co-sponsoring an "all-ages Pride event" in Flagstaff, Arizona, according to the Flagstaff Pride website. The party, which is called "Pride in the Pines" and includes drag queens and other performers, lists Bud Light as one of the companies sponsoring the June 17 event. (Bud Light is mentioned prominently in one of the posters.) The event is listed as a "family festival event" and a family-friendly, "safe space" for all visitors. Other big-name companies sponsoring the all-ages event for Pride Month include Old Navy, Toyota and Coca-Cola USA, according to an event flyer. Well, ya gotta admire the BALLS of that company. Brains, no. BALLS yeah. Their marketing department is taking quite a gamble. The gamble is that there is a HUGE demographic of drag queen pedophiles out there who will suddenly decide to drink that urine flavored beer. All ages drag show pretty much is an invitation to pedophiles everywhere. We know queers are a small segment of the American population. But you gotta ask yourself these two questions: 1. Are there as few pedophile queers as we think, or is there some huge in-the-closet base of child groomers and rapists just waiting? 2. Since when did queers ever start drinking that toxic masculinity liquid known as beer? Queers are more towards Dubonnet or wine coolers. More important, is there ANY doubt that this "all ages pride" crap is anything but pedophelia? Last time I checked, it was against the law to go after children. From the article: Drag events aimed at families and young children are taking place all over the country. In West Hollywood, California, a "family-friendly" Pride parade included men depicting a graphic BDSM sexual acts in videos that later went viral online. On Twitter, feminist outlet the Reduxx shared one graphic video from the parade where a nearly nude man was choked and whipped by another man in bondage gear. A Pride festival in Dallas featured sexually explicit merchandise for sale, including sex toys and graphic Disney fan art, according to another video widely shared online. The camera pans to show a little girl viewing a rack of button pins that have references to sexual positions and phrases like "send nudes." The member of the "queer nun group" appears to hand a rainbow button to another child. You REALLY want your young children to see stuff like this?