Hodad
Senior Member-
Posts
5,599 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
50
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Hodad
-
In every war in which people have fought for their freedom, there have been spineless rats like you, who side with the would-be oppressors You take for granted the liberty that better men have won for you, and spit on those with the courage to fight for themselves.
-
That's because Google does its best to de-prioritize fraud and phony sites that lack a user footprint. Try Duck Duck Go. Your friends will be sending it to you soon enough. Or you can start the trend! Let me break down how this will work. 1. They will set up these phony sites. 2. They will use their Facebook (and other) disinformation networks to spread propaganda to the same suckers they targeted in the last 2 elections. 3. Those targeted suckers will click the links and read the phony articles because they are utterly incapable of vetting and filtering information. If it's on the internet (and confirms their biases) it must be true! 4. The useful zombies will share and promote the phony stories within their social networks packed with similarly inept people. 5. More people will click through until the user base will register enough clicks to make early results on a Google search
-
Of course she wasn't murdered, you buffoon. There are few clearer-cut cases of self defense. Babbit was a conspiracy kook, just like you, and decided it was a good idea to break through a barricade to reach people who had nowhere left to run. She got exactly what she deserved--and demanded. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. And there was no serious court packing attempt, dumbass. Biden has actively and vocally opposed the idea all along. This is another of your nutball conspiracies. We're stuck with the justices who are there, including those sitting in their stolen seats--including the thoroughly corrupt, bought and paid for, Clarence Thomas.
-
Again, pure lies. She certainly was not murdered. Established on video. Confirmed in court. She absolutely WAS part of the mob. After they smashed through the window she decided to be "the tip of the spear" and climb through it. She was literally climbing through the window when she was shot. You can watch it happen on video, you thick fark. Even the Republicans in the room hailed the officer as a hero for protecting them from the mob. It's just you fever-swamp loons who cling to these conspiracy theories and alternative realities.
-
If so, it must be fairly said that it's a better deal than his fraudulent Trump University. This course seems to work.
-
Bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit. Not going to judge whether you're dumb or dishonest, but in either case, what you're saying here is wildly disconnected from reality. 1. No one was murdered. You can watch the video for yourself, but it was also established as a justified shooting in a court of law. 2. Babbitt was killed (not murdered) in very hot blood, as she and the mob broke through the last barricade to get to the trapped legislators who had retreated until they could retreat no further. There was literally nothing left between the mob and the people the officer was protecting. There was no choice remaining except to defend his charges or let the mob have them. 3. And there is no honest person--and no jurisdiction in America--in which that behavior is classified as trespassing. Literally none. I'm not just "fine" with the Babbitt shooting, I fully applaud the officer for taking a difficult action that they had tried and tried to avoid through ongoing retreat. It's unfortunate that Babbitt died from her wound, but the shooting stopped the rest of the mob from pouring through and likely saved the lives of the legislators trapped on the other side.
-
No, you thick twit. Nobody accused Chauvin of "inventing" a restraint. They accused him of misusing it in a way that contradicts the instructions in the manual you love posting, and contradicts department policy, and contradicts the in-person training he had received. Those exact points are literally discussed at trial testimony linked and in Chauvin's own admission of guilt. I can't teach you to read or force you to read, but it's there. And yes, Chauvin was racist and yes he had used excessive force against Black people in the past. His indifference to the life and health of those he assaulted is a complete dehumanization. There was nothing false about the narrative. It was exactly what it appeared to be on video: a cop slowly killing a man and watching indifferently as he stopped struggling, stopped responding, stopped breathing and stopped living.
-
A mob breaking and crawling through windows to get at the cornered legislators is trespassing? If a mob broke into your home or place of work and you barricaded yourself in the last room of retreat and the mob started smashing through the door, would you call it trespassing? Could you reasonably shoot to defend yourself? Jeebus. Trespassing! Lol. That's just pure lunacy. The twisted logic one needs to reach that conclusion is off the charts.
-
^^This perspective is just insane. A howling mob literally assaulted police, smashed through doors and windows into the Capitol, threatened the lives of our legislators and chased them from the building--all in an effort to overturn the results of an election. It is pure lunacy to think that the participants in this lawless rampage should not be prosecuted and face the consequences of their actions. Political prisoners! 🤪
-
Nah, plenty of evidence you're willing to do it for free.
-
Per video evidence and Chauvin's own admission, he broke protocol by maintaining that severe restraint long after Floyd was subdued, after he stopped resisting, after he stopped moving, after he stopped responding, after he stopped breathing, after he stopped living. Long after. What Chauvin did is directly contradictory to the guidance in that manual you showed, to the in-person training he was given, and to the department's use of force policies. And Chauvin has admitted it. Most people are "smart" enough not to casually kill a man in front of an audience. And most people are smart enough not to defend such actions. You and Chauvin are outliers.
-
Lies. There is NO manual anywhere that instructs officers to kneel on a person's neck for 9+ minutes. Quite the opposite. The Minneapolis chief of police testified that the restraint was not trained, authorized or compliant. The use-of-force instructor who developed the curriculum which was used in Chauvin's training testified that it was not approved. Chauvin himself, admitted that what he did was not compliant with his training or departmental policy. "The defendant admits that in using this unreasonable and excessive force, he acted willfully and in callous and wanton disregard ofthe consequences to Mr. Floyd's life. The defendant knew that what he was doing was wrong, in part, because it was contrary to his training as an MPD officer. The defendant chose to continue his use of force even though he knew from MPD policy and training that once Mr. Floyd was compliant, the defendant should have gotten off of him and moved him into a side recovery or seated position. The defendant also knew there was no legal justification to continue his use of force because he was aware that Mr. Floyd not only stopped resisting, but also stopped talking, stopped moving, stopped breathing, and lost consciousness and a pulse" You will say anything to defend the indefensible, but your lies won't change reality. Chauvin is now and will remain a convicted murderer.
-
^^This is the dumbest pile of fever swamp nonsense compiled in some time. Literally none of it is even close to true. Go back on your meds.
-
Again, complete fabrication on your part. With the exception of the long-term "occupations" in Portland and Seattle, the "riots" were functionally over by early June--and protests went on long after. Exactly nothing happened with the release of the body cam footage, which only further incriminated convicted murderer Derek Chauvin. Meanwhile, thank goodness you're here to spam the video of two random black men with opinions over and over and over again. Bravo!
-
Oh, I'm lying? Great, then you can point out where you did, in fact, correct your false statements attributing the content of the article to Yahoo News rather that the actual publisher, USA Today. See, a decent, honest person has no problem admitting a simple error. You fundamentally dishonest types will say anything to deflect and deny, even when we can all see the simple truth in stark black and white. So a casual observation that doesn't much matter will become a multi-post circus that will drag on until you slink away again. Good times...
-
Hey, Goofus, I know you like randomly ranting about stuff being "far left" (despite not having any idea what that actually means) but Yahoo News doesn't have any political bent. They are a news aggregator, as happy to reprint Fox as anything else. The article you're whining about currently is from USA Today. Go cry to them about it.🙄
