robosmith

Quite simply, you don't know what you're guessing about. Every time you call people childish names here, you ONLY reveal YOUR DESPERATION. AKA, no legitimate argument.

It's called a "contingent election" when State Legislatures substitute THEIR VOTE for the will of the voters. The plan was no big secret, and that is likely one reason it FAILED.

The mere CLAIM of "his business partner" carries no more credibility than YOUR CLAIM. Where is THE EVIDENCE, like BANK RECORDS? You do know that "holding money" means NOTHING, don't you? Maybe when you HAVE EVIDENCE it was actually GIVEN TO JOE, you might have a case. Right now, there is NO REPORTING that is even being investigated by the DoJ, except PERHAPS by some "guest" on Fox, which is NOT under oath.

^This OPINION does NOT make it "the truth." Since YOU NEVER post EVIDENCE, you have NO CREDIBILITY.

No EVIDENCE for ^this either. Mere CLAIMS mean NOTHING. Where is it IN WRITING? You know ACTUAL BANK RECORDS, which would exist IF it were true.

You've shown NO EVIDENCE for ^this opinion. Hunter is under investigation for tax violations and lying on a gun permit registration.

The NBER determines recessions and they HAVE NOT declared one this year. The ridiculous looking one is YOU cause all you got is a youtube. How Do Economists Determine Whether the Economy Is in a Recession?

Thanks again for admitting you are just a troll who doesn't give a shit about the truth. ?

Too bad you never have ANY evidence that money is transferred to Joe. AKA, just another of your delusions.

YOUR delusions are hilarious. Where to you get your schtick? We KNOW they are delusions cause you NEVER have ANY evidence to support your claims, just like Trump. LMAO

That has nothing to do with definition of extortion. Congress can legally without aid for any reason. Extortion means EXTRACTING wealth under threat, NOT refusing to DONATE.

No, you have to prove YOUR claim or STFU.

Seems you AND Tucker don't understand the OFFICIAL definition of "recession" is much more complicated than the commonly accepted SHORTHAND of 2 consecutive quarterly negative GDP numbers. And that one of those factors was that the 3rd consecutive quarterly GDP number was POSITIVE. Economics is HARD, even for PROFESSIONALS, so no one can blame YOU and Tucker for not understanding it.

You really don't understand what Russian trolls and bots are doing on US social media. Maybe try paying attention to pundits who have explained that MANY TIMES. YOUR cluelessness about that explains A LOT. LMAO.

You mean your biased observations, like believing Trump's LIES. Democrats have far more respect for the truth than the pathological LIAR named Trump. Trump is NOT a good liar, cause good liars maintain SOME credibility by NOT lying ALL THE TIME, LIKE Trump.

NOT if "kickbacks" can be proven. Your OPINION is never enough to prove "kickbacks."

No, when it's Fox, it is LYING.

Calling out his fantasy is in NO WAY "falling for" it. Nothing new about that. Fox lawyers used that as a blanket defense against libel a long time ago.

Who in today's Ukraine's government has gotten rich from their official service? Any theft by Ukrainian officials in the PAST does not excuse Putin's kleptocracy. So what? It's been part of Ukraine for 30 years. Khrushchev did not make Ukraine independent. And Russia guaranteed Ukraine's security IN WRITING. Putin BROKE that TREATY, but YOU'RE siding with a HUGE THIEF. You sure you're not a Russian troll?

COVID shutdowns are OVER, so no "keep sending checks to these people." In America, we have TEMPORARY unemployment insurance funded by businesses which lay people off, NOT the Federal government. Some may still be on the tail end of their coverage.

Your word don't mean JACK. Prove it. Conditioning AID by CONGRESS, on ACTIONS, is NOT extortion by ANY DEFINITION.

Already admitted that Hunter was hired for "influence," so you got nothing unless you can prove something illegal was "influenced."

Prove they are NOT "fake" or STFU.

Your OPINION of "shady" does NOT SPECIFY your alleged violation of the "spirit of the law." What law?

If you're so sure, PROVE IT. Or admit it takes NO EVIDENCE for you to believe bullshit.