robosmith

No, your strawman, as usual, is wrong. And the ONLY FBI agent charged was not guilty. And Hillary was never even charged with crime. So you're not making ANY sense. OTOH, the Republican led Senate Intelligence Committed concluded that Trump's campaign colluded with Russian agent Kilimnik to help the IRA target their campaign assistance.

Do you have anything intelligent to say? If not, stop digging that hole.

Real lawyers know that anything in sight that is evidence of a crime is FAIR GAME. Look it up.

Hmmm.... whom to believe....the judge AND the director of the FBI.... or some random dude on the Interwebz with NO EVIDENCE.... obvious choice there.

The OTHER reason to believe Barr is because he found his conscience AFTER Trump incited an insurrection and kept telling the BIG LIE to overturn the election. After that Barr stopped backing Trump's corruption. You've been conned.

You believe the SS is still there when Trump spends his summers in Bedminster? ㊙️ the SS is NOT guarding Trump's closets nor storage areas, they're guarding HIM.

Only the Trump cult doesn't know that he's a conman and you've been conned.

The ONLY one saying it's a witch hunt is Trump, which is exactly what all criminals say. The question is why you would believe a con man like Trump. Probably cause, you're unfamiliar with his long history of conning people. Do you even know about any of it? Early on, he used to call reporters masquerading as his own publicist named John Barron or John Miller. Those were some of his EARLIEST LIES. You've been CONNED.

On any count? I'll take that bet. Not sure why YOU'RE defending a con man.

Too bad you have NO authority nor expertise to render ^this judgement. Maybe you can FIND that in this paper by an EXPERT in US classification and laws. https://www.lawfareblog.com/classification-status-trumps-mar-lago-documents

Prove that the warrant authorized by the judge was illegal, IF you can.

Maybe it's you who is misinformed or lying. 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful Just because a BLM protest turned violent does not mean it was BLM leaders who provoked the violence. ?

What were the "both sides" which contained "fine people"? One side was marching with torches chanting "Jews will not replace us." Fine people there? One side was protesting the neo-Nazis. I'd say all the fine people were there. Maybe there was more than 2 sides? I'm betting you have NO GOOD answers.

Who told you ^this? No cite, so it appears you just made it up. BTW, if you clicked on the link, you'd know it was written by well known humorist. Gotcha.

Thanks for FINALLY POSTING SOMETHING. Too bad you didn't read it.

You seem to believe you have a LOT of experience with ^this BS.

^STILL nothing to back your BS.

Stop LYING. You don't know what you're talking about.

^More hat and STILL no cattle. Executive privilege belongs SOLELY to the current POTUS.

There is NO EVIDENCE that Trump declassified ANY of the documents he STOLE. Even if he did, he had NO RIGHT to possess or mis-store them.

If they're nuclear SAP secrets, only the POTUS, cabinet officials, or direct reports can give permission for access.

Keep running.

You STILL have not posted anything more that YOUR claims about the complex nuance of POTUS classification authorities. Do I need to refresh your memory with the analysis I posted from an ACTUAL EXPERT? Of course you NEVER answer inconvenient questions like ^this because you're all hat and no cattle. ?

Wanna bet he won't be?

The leakers are not confirming that yet. But it doesn't really matter AT ALL. Just more deflection on your part.