Jump to content

I am Groot

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,792
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by I am Groot

  1. Three guys were charged with murder but apparently, when someone on their cell block attacked a guard everyone was strip searched and made to sit in their underwear for a couple of hours. To Canadian judges, that, apparently, is vastly more important than any crime they could possibly commit. So yesterday, a Canadian judge stayed the charges and set them free after what it called 'state torture'. Murder charges against three men stayed over ‘torturous state actions’ at Ontario facility - The Globe and Mail
  2. Not old enough to drink or vote or have consensual sex, but if they want to change genders and take life-altering drugs then that's okay, no matter what their parents want.
  3. It's an interesting example of the two-faced nature of the Left who when it comes to crime, anyone under 18 is too young to appreciate the gravity of their actions, and so should not be held responsible for what they do, however brutal, vicious, and violent. But if they're ten years old and want to change genders, they instantly decide that the child knows what's best for it and the hell with what its parents want or say. The way the leftists on the Supreme Court kept cutting back on youths being sentenced as adults has now made it virtually impossible to hold them responsible for their actions. Ignoring the law, ignoring the will of parliament, and hand-waving away all concerns for public safety, they've made it clear they will not tolerate anyone under 18 being sentenced as an adult. No matter what the public or parliament want, do or say. In the summer of 2025, the Supreme Court put adult sentences into impossible territory with a decision called I.M., adding a new requirement that youth be proven to have the “developmental age akin to that of an adult.” That calculation takes a host of factors into account: biological age, sophistication, independence, mental health, behaviour after the crime, among others. Race, too, was made a factor through the guise of systemic discrimination, a concept that courts have adopted wholeheartedly. Under this regime, the young offender’s interests far outrank society’s interest in public safety. Jamie Sarkonak: Cold-blooded murderer, 17, sentenced like a child thanks to Supreme Court
  4. No, it hasn't gone away. It's been on full display since April. Carney has adopted every part of it, embraced the idea, and is living the life. He makes grand pronouncements about how things are all going to be fixed. Housing is going to be ramped up to a billion houses a month! We'll be getting hundreds of billions in new trade exports outside the US! We're going to crack down on crime and easy bail! Just uh... wait a few years for our very, very important changes to start showing their impact. Carney using network TV to promise $300 billion in new exports outside the US. Oh? How's that going to happen? He didn't say. Is there a deadline for this? When can we expect it to happen? No idea. Trust me, bro. And now his phony bail reform act, which is nothing of the sort. It's minor tinkering around the edges that will likely have as much impact on crime as their billion-dollar hunting gun buyback program. Why can't they just reverse what they did? Because that would be admitting they made a mistake. And that, they will never do, no matter how many innocent people have to die so they can pretend things are working fine. Bill C-14, Justice Minister Sean Fraser’s proposed bail reform law, was marketed as a bundle of “sweeping reforms.” In reality, we’re getting no such thing. This bill is just a facade, giving only the appearance of grand change. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jamie-sarkonak-liberals-bill-c-14-offers-cosmetic-change-for-bail-and-sentencing
  5. So you find nothing wrong with them spending the entire election pounding tables, insulting and threatening Americans, promising to go 'elbows up', sneering at the Conservatives as a party that would bow down to Trump, and then the instant he gets elected, bowing down to Trump and turning into a cringing flatterer?
  6. Because most of that money never gets to the natives. It's sucked away by corruption, going to a variety of Liberal friendly contractors, consultants, businessmen, and lawyers.
  7. If there had been a real investigation, they would have interviewed the principal subject - Trudeau. But they did not.
  8. What he's doing is he's bringing people like this to Canada. https://x.com/l3v1at4an/status/1981017066489671696
  9. For those with no real knowledge of the case, it can be best summed up thusly: The Cowichan lived and still live on Vancouver Island. In the summer, they'd come over the strait and set up a fishing camp and pick berries. They mostly stopped that after trading posts were set up on Vancouver Island by the Hudson Bay Company. Decades later, the area was taken over by the British. Eventually, surveyors checked over the area. There was no sign of the natives. Titles were sold off to various people, and that was that until 2014, when the Cowichan suddenly said that was their land and they wanted it back (or a really big payout). The land is worth about $100 billion. To list the many ways in which the trial judge showed open bias and favoritism to the Cowichan and ignored established and constitutional law, and principles, as well as all evidence presented that disputed the Cowichan's, and how politicized, ideologically bound Canadian judges have ignored the constitution to favour natives over the years, this is an excellent summary in easy-to-understand language: https://c2cjournal.ca/2025/09/manufactured-judgements-how-canadas-courts-promote-indigenous-radicalism/
  10. It's really been illustrative of the bias of the mainstream media to watch them enthusiastically embrace his 'Elbows up!' talk during the election, then instantly turn around and congratulate and flatter him for his 'We love Trump!' attitude the instant he was elected. They went from "Carney is going to take on that stinking, horrible Trump! He won't let us get pushed around! He'll show that evil creature who the boss is! He'll stand up for Canada!" to "What a brilliant man to realize the need to flatter and submit to Trump! There's no way we can possibly stand up to the Americans on trade." And the sheeple of the Left have gone right along with them. Carney helped incite a whole new level of anti-Americanism during his election campaign, then went down south, kissed the ring, and told Trump on numerous occasions what a wise and brilliant man he was. And the liberal left just accepts it! I'd love to be in an alternate world where Poilevre got elected, took the exact same position with the exact same words after the election, and see you guys fume and fulminate and shake your angry little fists at him for being a suckholing surrender monkey. Because I have absolutely NO doubt that would be your attitude.
  11. As I've pointed out before, all Trump does is address longstanding grievances the political class has studiously ignored. That's the only reason he's in power. Because the political class ignores the will of the people for only so long before the people say "F you all!" and bring in the populist. Same thing is happening in the UK now. DEI, as much as you adore official racism, has pissed off a lot of people for a long time. And it's been getting worse, more blatant. There are ads pointed out every day, mostly for public sector jobs, which are quite clearly racist in nature and would horrify the likes of you if the wording were reversed to demand only white people apply, or make it clear that 'no blacks wanted'. The way the Left, which is always claiming to be 'for the people,' continues to be utterly baffled by human behaviour is a fascinating thing. It's been quite clear for a century now. The whole Communist/Marxist/Socialist belief systems are predicated on ignorance of human behaviour. He answered a question about the SNC Lavalin affair, agreed it was a fake investigation, and said Trudeau ought to have gone to jail for that (which is certainly arguable). It wasn't a vow to 'get him' if he's elected, simply because he doesn't like him.
  12. You're acting like this was an official speech or release from the office of the leader of the opposition. He was doing an interview. The interviewer asked about it the SNC Lavalin scandal, and he responded. To paraphrase, "Yeah, that was a fake investigation. They didn't even interview him. The RCMP covered for him. The guy ought to be in jail for interfering in a prosecution like that (which is, in fact, illegal).
  13. This is what the Liberals have done to Canada
  14. Is that your new sig? Can you tell me what being a black entrepeneur has to do with the health department? Can you tell me why you think the health department should be spending just under $200 million on black entrepeneurs and ONLY Black entrpeneurs?
  15. I want everyone treated the same. You want special programs for non-whites. Especially blacks. Like this. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/news/2025/10/minister-michel-highlights-investments-to-help-black-entrepreneurs-start-up-scale-up-and-build-canadas-economy.html
  16. The Left insists on DEI because it thinks all non-whites are inferior and can't compete with Whites. And of all the inferior ones, none are as inferior as Blacks. That is definitely the way you guys think. Anyone trying to hold them to the same standards or make them compete with whites is being mean and nasty because that's just not fair. It's the liberal bigotry of low expectations at play. And you're not capable of thinking anything different.
  17. You're full of sh1t. You know very well how they demonize Christians, how they scaremongered about what Harper was allegedly going to do, how they fearmonger about the Christians in the Conservative Party. The Left adores Muslims despite Muslims being vastly worse than Christians in all the ways they hate Christians for. The Left: "Christians are evil because they would ban abortion and get rid of gay marriage!" Normal person: "But the Muslims would ban abortion, too, and put gay people in prison." The Left: "How dare you attack Muslims, you Islamophobe! That's the way things are shaping up. There are the forces who support and defend Western civilization, and the forces who want to tear it down. Muslims are most definitely on the latter side, along with a huge chunk of the Left. I honestly don't know why the Left doesn't just move to Islamic countries where they'll be happier.
  18. They do? Let's consider that a moment. First, the Left in Canada absolutely despises fundamentalist Christians. Yet you use the comparison as a compliment to Muslims. Second, what fundamentalist Christans and fundamentalist Muslims believe is wildly different. As I think Sam Harris once said, the real problem with Islamic fundamentalism are the fundamentals of Islam. It is a mlitaristic religion that casts anthema on unbelievers and not only gives permission, but urges its followers to attack them and take what is theirs while forcing them to submit to Islam and become Muslims.
  19. You wouldn't pay any attention. You consider DEI and special programs for Blacks to be only right and proper and only get indignant if anyone suggests they should be treated like everyone else. Because in your heart, you consider blacks uncivilized people incapable of acting like whites. No, because the entire trans issue has been lifted wholesale from the US. Your views are identical fo whatever it is the Amerian Left feels at any given time. You aren't capable of independent thought. Whatever your American heros think, that's what you will think.
  20. Do you have a single political or social view that doesn't come straight up from the US?
  21. And I knew as soon as I saw your name, it would be another no-effort dismissal of all complaints against the Left's policies from a man who is as unshakably confident of the perfection of those policies and beliefs as Justin Trudeau.
  22. Almost all of which has been deliberately created by the Liberal Party and its leftist allies with their paternalistic treatment of natives, their lavish spending on them, their insistence in every word, sentence, and deed that they are the legitimate owners of all of Canada, and everyone else is merely an illegal 'settler' on stolen land, their insispid, virtue signalling land acknowledgements seeking to drum into unwilling audiences that natives are the true owners of the land, it all insights people to think "Fine, let's fight over it. And this time, all survivors on the losing side get expelled to wherever will take them." Because it IS discrimination against white people, you brainless twat. I have a feeling your definition of 'actual conservative' is 'someone who agrees with me wholeheartedly except for being a little more fiscally sane."
×
×
  • Create New...