Jump to content

West

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,481
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    31

Posts posted by West

  1. On 11/9/2023 at 8:56 PM, CdnFox said:

    The antisemitism is out of control.  We see it even on the board here.  The raw hatred of the jews and  "not being able to get past' the past as one poster here put it, how can there ever be peace without one side or the other being wiped out.

    Leftists are making society unbearable

  2. 30 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    You can't honestly say the evidence doesn't exist.

    Why not? No American was charged in relation for anything to do with Russia. 

    Either they were chasing non crimes or there was no evidence that such crimes existed. Either way it was a fraud on the American public and was an attempt to stall the agenda of a DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT.AKA treason or another high crime 

  3. 29 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    Ample evidence of collusion, which is not a legal term.

    But that's what was investigated. 

    Are you saying they made up a non crime to investigate Donnie over? Thanks for FINALLY admitting the investigation was a sham

    30 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    Manafort went to extraordinary lengths to conduct ongoing secret meetings to share sensitive campaign intelligence with a Russian intelligence operative, who then delivered that same intel to the Kremlin.

    Then why wasn't he charged for something other than tax evasion?

  4. 1 hour ago, Hodad said:

    No, he didn't. You are lying. As has been pointed out many times on this forum, this is what Mueller said:

    “The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.

    “We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”

    Mueller found an incredible amount of evidence of collusion (and even more was uncovered and confirmed in subsequent investigations. It's beyond any reasonable doubt that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian intelligence. But as Mueller said, that's a different question than proving criminal conspiracy.

    No, dummies, there were two charges that you are conflating in that quote. 

    1. The question of obstruction

    2. The question of collusion which NO AMERICAN was charged. 

    If there was nothing illegal than the entire investigation was a SCAM TO BEGIN WITH as we already know therefore by your own admission that collusion isn't a thing, it's not illegal for Trump not to cooperate with a SHAM of an investigation and the question of obstruction is mute. 

    Just Hillary WHINING about losing to a political novice hahahahah

    • Like 1
  5. 2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

    Wrong. There are ZERO, and you're a stooge for thinking there were.

    People were indicted for multiple charges, with a smattering of collusion-related BS among them, but no one has ever been found guilty fo a single charge, aside form the FBI. 

    If they have, then just provide the links, kiddo. 

    Mueller concluded that there was no evidence any American colluded with Russia during 2016

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. 19 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

    Again, just read the lawsuit

    Talking with you is like talking to a petulant toddler

    Trump’s loans were not approved through the same method as your house or commercial property where the bank’s appraisal is the most important factor. Paragraphs 563 and 564 of the lawsuit explain why:

    563. Starting in 2011 the relationship with Deutsche Bank was revitalized when Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization initiated a relationship with bankers in the Private Wealth Management (“PWM”) division of Deutsche Bank, which enabled them to obtain more favorable terms than they could have received through the CRE division by having Mr. Trump personally guarantee the loans based on his net worth as reflected in his Statements of Financial Condition.

    564. In essence, rather than obtain credit facilities through the wing of Deutsche Bank with an expertise in commercial real estate, Mr. Trump began to seek funds from a wing of Deutsche Bank focused on servicing ultrawealthy clients. Hence, Mr. Trump’s personal guaranty, and his representations regarding his finances that backed up that guaranty, featured prominently in Mr. Trump’s loan transactions through the PWM wing of Deutsche Bank.

    This wasn’t like any bank loan process you’re familiar with, so you can’t assume it works the same way.

    The banks were approving loans based on all his holdings and the claims he made about them — not just on the property he wanted a loan for.

    The banks were not doing their own appraisals on every asset and liability Trump had anywhere in the world, they were relying on other appraisals he provided, and the financial statements he provided. This is where many of the frauds occurred.

    The lawsuit is ridiculous. That's WHAT I AM TELLING YOU. 

    They've got a partisan attorney and a partisan judge imposing DELUSIONS on the public. 

    And Trump REPAID all his loans. 

    The banks aren't even going after him for false statements. It's a RETARDED prosecutor who is doing so because HE IS A POLITICIAN OF AN OPPOSING POLITICAL PARTY

  7. 33 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

    You poor gullible fool.

    Donald inflated the values for loans and deflated the values for taxes.

    These are documented facts.

    See below:

    https://www.google.com/url?q=https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/tto_release_properties_addendum_-_final.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjMrZXFw7yCAxXDOEQIHXN3Ah4QFnoECAoQAg&usg=AOvVaw1tmFfPnRxzGKwNUnMmCWha

    Your lack of understanding on how taxes are appraised is pretty evident. Donnie doesn't appraise his property value for taxes any more than a bank would allow him to make up a number to get a loan. 

    Only unintelligent people believe otherwise 

  8. 11 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    Maybe the banks did their own appraisals, and maybe they didn’t, but the court has already ruled that the Trump organization committed fraud. The independent appraiser might believe the statement that the penthouse was 30,000 square feet, when Trump knew it was 10,000. They might not have found that certain deed and rent control restrictions were in place on certain properties. This is why you are legally obligated to honestly disclose everything on these applications.  
     

    The Trump Organization submitted these evaluations to banks repeatedly, and they grossly overstated the values of dozens of properties over and over. It’s not like they fudged the numbers by 10 or 20% of one property one time. This was far beyond an honest mistake.  It was deliberate, and the testimony shows that a wide number of Trump employees were in on it and aware of it.  
     

    I just explained why Mar-A-Lago is worth only $20 million-ish, yet Trump continues to lie about its value.  

    Yeah well this judge is clearly an f'd up lunatic. 

    19 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

    Trump’s loans were not approved through the same method as your house or commercial property where the bank’s appraisal is the most important factor. Paragraphs 563 and 564 of the lawsuit explain why:

    563. Starting in 2011 the relationship with Deutsche Bank was revitalized when Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization initiated a relationship with bankers in the Private Wealth Management (“PWM”) division of Deutsche Bank, which enabled them to obtain more favorable terms than they could have received through the CRE division by having Mr. Trump personally guarantee the loans based on his net worth as reflected in his Statements of Financial Condition.

    564. In essence, rather than obtain credit facilities through the wing of Deutsche Bank with an expertise in commercial real estate, Mr. Trump began to seek funds from a wing of Deutsche Bank focused on servicing ultrawealthy clients. Hence, Mr. Trump’s personal guaranty, and his representations regarding his finances that backed up that guaranty, featured prominently in Mr. Trump’s loan transactions through the PWM wing of Deutsche Bank.

    This wasn’t like any bank loan process you’re familiar with, so you can’t assume it works the same way.

    The banks were approving loans based on all his holdings and the claims he made about them — not just on the property he wanted a loan for.

    The banks were not doing their own appraisals on every asset and liability Trump had anywhere in the world, they were relying on other appraisals he provided, and the financial statements he provided. This is where many of the frauds occurred.

    This judge is just making shit up as he goes along. He's got the mental disease known as Trump Derangement Syndrome. 

     

    Times a ticking on guys like this judge who'll be locked up once Donnie wins re-election. He's already promised to go scorched earth on crazies like this judge

  9. 1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

    I've heard a load of far right zealots claim that since Donald "believed" his property valuations were correct, then Donald cannot suffer legal consequences.

    To be clear, the issue is that Donald inflated the value of his properties to get loans, then deflated those same values come tax time.

    So, no.... It doesn't matter what Donald "believes".

    He is guilty as sin.

    Are you dumb? 

    It's not what Trump believes. The banks would do their own appraisal on his property before signing off on a loan.

     

  10. 37 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    You make dumb ASSumptions. Duh

    What do believe $15K is going to buy Menendez? It certainly won't do ANYTHING to the legal case against him.

    The DSCC plays no role in that.

    Manendez accepted hundreds of thousands in embezzled funds dumb dumb and this just PROVES the democrats are corrupt. 

    Just like Joe accepting MILLIONS from the Chinese Communist Party

×
×
  • Create New...