Jump to content

West

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,481
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    31

Posts posted by West

  1. 1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

    45-page indictment

    Democrats write alot of pages. 

    Just like the BULLSHIT Steele Dosier

    1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

    A grand jury

    A GRAND JURY only determines if there's "evidence" to move ahead with an indictment. 

    It DOES NOT mean they are guilty. 

    And YOU CAN INDICT A HAM SANDWICH in the US. The entire system is moronic

  2. 7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    allegations of significant voting fraud coming to them were baseless

    So? This was his OPINION at the time. 

    Not evidence of his GUILT. Because Trump himself believed that the election was rigged. And he was RIGHT. 

    1. The FBI LIED about the collusion delusion

    2. Cover ups of Biden's laptop which showed nasty stuff

    3. Changing voting procedures under the guise of Covid.

    DUH

  3. 47 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    If she had evidence, she would have presented it.

    You fail to understand what I'm saying to you. 

    The basis for this nonsensical case is that Donald Trump presumably knew that he had lost the election and I would assume the claim is he fraudulently fundraised off of it. 

    There's no evidence that these people knew they were lying. Jenna Ellis even said something to the effect "if I knew then what I knew now". She presumably believed at the time there was funny business and is being hung on a low level conviction I would assume to make this farce of "justice" go away.

    In the real world, none of this nonsense should be tying up the court system. Any reasonable person has questions about the conduct prior to the election, changing up voting laws, etc which is really what Giulianis case was about. 

    This whole thing that they concocted fake electorate is nonsense too. This idea of dual slate electors has been used at least two other times in American history. The election itself had many questions due to the nature of which they changed laws and whether or not proper process was followed and this at least needed a day in court, NOT threats of jail time for bringing it forward. 

    There certainly should not be this all out weaponization of the justice system as we are seeing now. Should not be criminalizing the practice of law. This is the bullshit they do in Venezuela but of course you being a lefty communist you support it

     

  4. On 10/23/2023 at 7:03 AM, NYLefty said:

    It tickles my heart whenever I see this rightwingdingaling lockstep support and imaginary kinship they think they have with Jews and Isreal ?

    It's all in their programming.

    Well here's the facts Righties. I'm a NYer and know a little about the Jewish people and they F*ckin Hate You! Jews are overwhelmingly Democrats and Liberal. They hate your phony assed Evangellohead churches and your religious right Dumbf*ckery. All Jews are pro choice and they hate Trump, they hate Fox News and wouldn't give a Reich Winger the time of day on the streets.

     

    Even tho the Democrat base sides with hamas 

  5. 17 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    Jeebus, dude. Just read. This has nothing t to do with Clinton's server. The conversation is about the DNC hack. Just Putin helping his buddy again.

    Putin tried to hack the Republicans but they had a better password than "Russia123"

    22 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    that they--and he--never believed it

    Once again you are totally out to lunch. Who has claimed such a thing? 

  6. 1 hour ago, Rebound said:

    Hmm… well those thousands and thousands of pages were released, but Trump’s hand-picked “Lock Her Up” attorneys general failed to indict any Democrat for so much as a parking ticket.  

    She should've been locked up for HOSTING A PRIVATE UNSECURED SERVER WHERE SHE WAS HAVING DEALINGS WITH MILITARY ETC AS SECRETARY OF STATE

    8 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    You have confused your twisted imagination for reality.

    Directly from Crowdstrike

     
     

    CrowdStrike’s work with the Democratic National Committee: Setting the record straight

    Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee

    June 5, 2020 UPDATE

    Blog update following the release of the testimony by Shawn Henry, CSO and President of CrowdStrike Services, before the House Intelligence Committee that was recently declassified.

    What was CrowdStrike’s role in investigating the hack of the DNC?

    CrowdStrike was contacted on April 30, 2016 to respond to a suspected breach. We began our work with the DNC on May 1, 2016, collecting intelligence and analyzing the breach. After conducting this analysis and identifying the adversaries on the network, on June 10, 2016 we initiated a coordinated remediation event to ensure the intruders were removed and could not regain access. That remediation process lasted approximately 2-3 days and was completed on June 13, 2016.

    Why did the DNC contact CrowdStrike?

    The DNC contacted CrowdStrike to respond to a suspected cyber attack impacting its network. The DNC was first alerted to the hack by the FBI in September 2015. According to testimony by DNC IT contractor Yared Tamene Wolde-Yohannes, the FBI attributed the breach to the Russian Government in September 2015 (page 7).

    Why did the DNC hire CrowdStrike instead of just working with the FBI to investigate the hack?

    The FBI doesn’t perform incident response or network remediation services when organizations need to get back to business after a breach.

    CrowdStrike is a leader in protecting customers around the world from cyber threats. It is common for organizations to hire third-party industry experts, like CrowdStrike, to investigate and remediate cyber attacks when they suspect a breach even if they are collaborating with law enforcement. As John Carlin, former Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division at The Department of Justice, testified before the House Intelligence Committee (cited from page 21 of his testimony):

    “A lot of — outside of any political organization, companies, most corporations, they often would use these third party contractors, who they hired through their own counsel, and maximize the control from the point of view of the victim.”

    Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC? 

    Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.

    Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network.

    To reference, CrowdStrike’s account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, “CrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network – COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR…. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.”

    This conclusion has most recently been supported by the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issuing a report [intelligence.senate.gov] validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community, published on January 6, 2017,  that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.

    The Senate report states on page 48:

    “The Committee found that specific intelligence as well as open source assessments support the assessment that President Putin approved and directed aspects of this influence campaign.”

    Furthermore, in his testimony in front of the House Intelligence Committee, Shawn Henry stated the following with regards to CrowdStrike’s degree of confidence that the intrusion activity can be attributed to Russia, cited from page 24:

    1. HENRY: We said that we had a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government.  And our analysts that looked at it and that had looked at these types of attacks before, many different types of attacks similar to this in different environments, certain tools that were used, certain methods by which they were moving in the environment,and looking at the types of data that was being targeted, that it was consistent with a nation-state adversary and associated with Russian intelligence.

    OK. 

    ALL THE MORE REASON NOT TO HAVE A PRIVATE SERVER NEXT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S TOILET

  7. 1 hour ago, Rebound said:

     No. 
    Stealing data from someone’s computer is illegal. So let’s stop there because it is clear that you are detached from reality. 
     

    If you incentivize someone to steal something, and then they steal it, you are an accessory to the crime.  If two or more people even plan a crime and they don’t commit the crime, it’s still conspiracy.  This isn’t make-believe. That’s the law in the U.S., and Donald Trump broke these laws repeatedly.  

    Why are you more concerned about how someone got the info than what the info was ?..

    Why I don't take Democrats seriously

  8. 22 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    Biden gets a F- on every major job category: the border, the economy, Afghanistan withdrawal, foreign policy, military strategy, law enforcement, energy policy, oil reserves, protecting American rights & freedoms, etc., are all a solid 0/10. His aggressive NATO push is responsible for the Russia/Ukraine war and his weakness and chaos provided the flashing green light for the Hamas war.

    Just when we thought that the evidence of Biden's failures couldn't get any more damning, we're now learning that American/Israeli assets in the gulf are shy on protection because of yet another of Biden's terrible decisions: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/us-to-pull-patriot-batteries-from-key-mideast-countries-report-671437

     

    • The US is moving up to eight Patriot air defense batteries from key countries in the Middle East, according to a Wall Street Journal report on Friday.
    • Air defense batteries are key to protecting countries against Iranian missiles and other threats. Removing them and their radar have far-reaching ramifications, if the reports are accurate.

     

    Instead of just admitting to Biden's failures and moving on, leftists yappers pretend that everything is going just perfectly, and that America's main issues are global warming, covid, and prosecuting/persecuting everyone who ever doubted the integrity of the Dems & CNN. 

    1) The Dems clearly don't have any big-boy pants to put on, they still feel like their man-panties can carry the day

    2) Their divisive anti-everything American drivel has turned into full-fledged jihadi propagandism. Their loudest members pretend not to see the hail of rockets still descending on Israel, and want Israel to just give Hamas a chance to reload and come up with their next strategy for genocide. 

    This is not the time for more hate and divisiveness from the Dems. This isn't the time for jihadi propaganda from congress. America's biggest problem is not Donald Trump and the GOP. The Dems need to actually focus on the world, as it exists today, and move forward with a real-world plan. Their dedication to distractions from reality is biting the entire world in the ass. 

    Thank you for speaking what's true in an age where that's not popular

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  9. 28 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    Let me guess, you think the "fire department" is responsible for starting fires?

    You think an opioid task force distributes opioids? 

     ?

    How about this, regardless of time and resources (which were ample!) just as a baseline for decent and responsible behavior, don't claim massive election fraud without evidence. That shouldn't need to be said, but there are some slow folks out there--and some slow ex-presidents.

     

    I believe Joe when he says he engaged in voter fraud. 

    He admitted his guilt

  10. 1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

    "Observable occurrences" don't mean shit in a court of law.

    One thing Donald has never had is evidence of fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law.

    if Donald had evidence of fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law, he'd have already presented it.

    Instead he's got his moronic crack head pals like Mike Pillow "claiming" to have explosive new evidence that never gets presented....... Do you know why?

    Because it doesn't exist.

    And all the stu pid suckers like yourself are eating up Donalds shit with a spoon.

    You should probably wipe your mouth after all that shit eating.

     

    He had like 3 weeks to examine what Joe Biden called the "most extensive voter fraud organization in history". 

  11. 23 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    They thought there was fraud because they were incredibly stupid people who were easily manipulated by a con man.  And the GOP set it up to work out that way, because they passed laws to prevent ANY counting of absentee and vote by mail ballots until the polls closed.  
     

    So they PASSED LAWS to make it IMPOSSIBLE to have final results on Election Day, then tell their faithful to only vote in person, so they can pretend something is amiss. 
     

    It is EASY to know on election night whether a candidate has decisively won: How large is his margin compared to the uncounted ballots.  It was clear that there were many outstanding uncounted ballots in PA, GA, AZ and MI on election night. 
     

    You people just make up these ridiculous lies, which work with your stupld friends but not with j reliant people. Certainly not with judges. 
     

    And now THREE of Trump’s election lawyers ADMIT they know Trump lost the election and they were part of a scheme to lie and commit illegal acts of outright fraud to overturn the legitimate election results. These lawyers include a Harvard educated lawyer and a former Federal prosecutor; safe to say that if they thought they could plead innocent and avoid jail time, they would. 

    Dude you were grifted by Hillary Clinton over collusion and still to this day bought into the lies. 

    At least I based my skepticism on observable occurances such as the bullshit of using covid to push mail in ballots and vote tallying stopping with Trump well ahead in the count 

    • Haha 1
  12. 8 hours ago, robosmith said:

    You SHOULD be disappointed when ANYONE like Trump who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution turns out to be a LIAR and tries to overturn an election when he was told by most everyone that HE LOST.

    But you'll celebrate instead because your allegiance to the law is non-existent. AKA, a criminal.

    They for good reason thought there was fraud. The vote counting all the sudden stopped with Trump up big only to then have his hundred thousand vote leads disappear.

  13. 27 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

    It was almost entirely peaceful and joyous celebration of democracy, because the vast majority of people there weren't rioting.

    That's your own leftard standard, not mine. Does it not work for you anymore? 

    The Democrats RIGGED the election the moment they falsely accused the president of collusion with Russia and threatening aid to look into legitimate questions about Joe's behavior abroad

    1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

    LMAO No you’re not!   You’re for a justice system controlled by your party where your party’s officials are above the law and act with total impunity including rigging elections. That’s a lot like Kim Jong Un. 

    Why haven't Democrats been put on trial for lying about collusion? Because the "justice" system is infiltrated by communists

    • Downvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...