West
-
Posts
7,693 -
Joined
-
Days Won
32
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by West
-
-
10 hours ago, Dougie93 said:
here we see how the leftist lunatic Aristides has the leftist obsession with the AR15
programmed into them by the Liberal media
it's the scariest gun in the world to leftists who know nothing about guns
but it's actually a pop gun in military terms
the previous Canadian Forces rifle, the FN FAL is far more powerful and longer ranged
the AR15 was chosen to be used by conscripts, so it's small & light and easy to shoot
and the 5.56x45mm cartridge is not chosen for its firepower, but rather its small size, so you can carry more ammo
Assault rifle = "scary looking gun".
Media hype and sensationalism is all.
-
So once again Tamara Liche faces a leftist activist nut bar as judge. Guy apparently donated to Trudeau. Amazing how many Liberal Party donors are ending up as judge in this star chamber show trial. Very sad what Trudeau has turned our country in to
-
So ol lady Nancy's husband gets charged with a DUI causing bodily injury. Any normal person would be in the slammer. How much do you want to bet this fella gets off?
-
22 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:
1. The US “instant background check” is heavily flawed and full of loopholes thanks to Republican interference. It only checks criminal convictions and court orders and doesn’t apply to private sales or gun show sales. Multiple mass shooters have been able to purchase firearms despite having criminal concoctions that the Instant background check didn’t detect: including right wing extremist Dylan Roof and the Sutherland Springs shooter. In Switzerland the local police actually come out and conduct interviews with the applicant and people who know them, its not just an automated check of convictions. Given that this week’s mass shooter legally purchased his guns despite having a history of posting disturbing content online and was a known weirdo loner it’s likely he wouldn’t have been allowed to do so in Switzerland.
Funny none of America’s many many mass shooters and school shooters had anything to do with cartels or illegal immigration. Stop inventing distractions and stop pretending Democrats are somehow to blame for the weather. If anything it was Republicans Iran-Contra cocaine smuggling enterprise that turned Central and South American drug smuggling from a tiny cottage industry for local small-time criminals into a major worldwide criminal operation. And then Reagan’s “war on drugs” to try and offset a problem they created which was carried forward by every Republican and Democrat since only poured gasoline on the fire.
2. False, True but so what, and False
3. So what. Like I said the Swiss are trained and educated and guns are throughly regulated. Exactly the opposite of USA.
1. The US system is made up of both state law and federal law. There's no such thing as the "gun show loophole".. thats a sad democrat talking point. As is the false claim you can legally own an ak47 in the US.
You would need an insane amount of administration to make your system work which ultimately would collapse because of it.
2. Not False at all. The long form gun registry was a colossal failure. Just a cash grab. You leftists just parrot whatever you hear on CNN, driven by a savior complex but end up just screwing everything you touch up.
3. So what? ?.
The Swiss have open carry on trains therefore this nonsense about guns being the issue is clearly false. Perhaps if you nummies would stop grave dancing for a second and stop with the culture war bs to scare people into voting for you some actual solutions could be developed.
And before you blame the nra your proposals are simply NOT rooted in practicality or common sense. They are stupid
-
4 hours ago, BeaverFever said:
You don’t know what you’re talking about. Switzerland actually has very strict gun control rules that are more similar to Canada than the US: the Swiss require ownership permits and thorough background checks, firearms are registered with law enforcement and owners even have to pass a practical competency test where they demonstrate they know how to load and operate the firearm before they’re allowed to get a license which is something not even Canada has.
You’re confused by conservative propaganda that tries to distort the fact that the Swiss simply have a very high fun ownership participation rate, but just as widespread automobile ownership doesn’t prove a country has lax automobile laws, widespread gun ownership doesn’t mean lax gun laws. The Swiss require mandatory full-time military service from all males, followed in most cases by mandatory part-time reserve duty for most of their adult life. Swiss citizens can purchase their service weapon after their full-time duty and keep their firearms at home. Half of all privately owned firearms in Switzerland are former military issue. So most Swiss gun owners are actually trained professionals who take firearms seriously, not unskilled rednecks wanting a cool toy to make up for a small dick and lack of success with women.
By the way, Switzerland still has one of the worst gun crime rates in Europe. It’s not correlation its causation.
1. The US also does background checks. Their issue is a wide open southern border that democrats want to do nothing about which leads to human trafficking, drug cartels who are ultimately armed and causing the unusually high amount of gun crime
2. When Canada put in the long form gun registry it did absolutely nothing to curtail gun crime. It just added yet another tax on law abiding gun owners. Most people didn't even register their firearms anyway.
3. If you've ever been to Switzerland its not uncommon to see them carrying firearms around with them on public transit. The population is only 8 million too...
-
24 minutes ago, Aristides said:
I don't care about the US constitution. You are digging your own grave.
You may not, however, that's the role of a judge and why they landed where they did. Hence the thread'
2 hours ago, Aristides said:So she got a manslaughter conviction for drug use?
So, is addiction a medical issue or a crime in your world?
Funny but there aren't any affluent white women who seem to be charged with having miscarriages due to substance abuse. I guess none of them do drugs or drink.
When your addiction causes the death of someone then you face consequences. Deal with it... you don't get a pass because you abuse your body
-
1 hour ago, blackbird said:
quote
Paul's Road to Damascus Conversion Story Summary
The story of Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus is told in Acts 9:1-19 and retold by Paul in Acts 22:6-21 and Acts 26:12-18.
Saul of Tarsus, a Pharisee in Jerusalem after the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ, swore to wipe out the new Christian church, called The Way. Acts 9:1 says that Paul was "breathing out murderous threats against the Lord's disciples." Saul obtained letters from the high priest, authorizing him to arrest any followers of Jesus in the city of Damascus.
On the Road to Damascus, Saul and his companions were struck down by a blinding light. Saul heard a voice say, "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?" (Acts 9:4, NIV) When Saul asked who was speaking, the voice replied: "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do." (Acts 9:5-6, NIV)
Saul was blinded. His companions led him into Damascus to a man named Judas, on Straight Street. For three days Saul was blind and didn't eat or drink.
Meanwhile, Jesus appeared in a vision to a disciple in Damascus named Ananias and told him to go to Saul. Ananias was afraid because he knew Saul's reputation as a merciless persecutor of the church.
Jesus repeated his command, explaining that Saul was his chosen instrument to deliver the gospel to the Gentiles, their kings, and the people of Israel. So Ananias found Saul at Judas' house, praying for help. Ananias laid his hands on Saul, telling him Jesus had sent him to restore his sight and that Saul might be filled with the Holy Spirit.
Something like scales fell from Saul's eyes, and he could see again. He arose and was baptized into the Christian faith. Saul ate, regained his strength, and stayed with the Damascus disciples three days.
After his conversion, Saul changed his name to Paul.
unquote
Paul's Road to Damascus Conversion Bible Study Guide (learnreligions.com)
I would recommend you look the verses up in the King James Bible, not the NIV, which is corrupt.
Amen brother
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Aristides said:
For drug use.. We've been over this already.
You folks really need to stop lying and actually educate yourself. It's disgusting the character assassination the pro baby killing side is participating in right now
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, Aristides said:
What disinformation. Abortions are not done in Canada after 20 months except under extreme circumstances. Only 1% of abortions in the US are done after 20 months so the same criteria pretty much applies there. Your BS about thousands of kids being ripped apart in late term abortions is the real disinformation.
As a matter of fact, the majority of abortions are not done surgically.
You won't be charged for manslaughter for a "miscarriage". And we aren't going to reinstatement slavery. Stop the bullshit fear mongering. It's disgusting. Also the vast majority of abortions are not due to incest, rape or medical issues... another lie from you folks to justify baby murder
I never said anything really about late term abortions. Enough are being ripped apart earlier as well
-
24 minutes ago, Aristides said:
No she can't. We don't do abortions after 20 weeks. This was their third try after two miscarriages. In some US states she might have had to worry about a manslaughter charge after her miscarriages. The idea that some dumb fuck right wing politicians get to decide which women can be charged for having a miscarriage is right out of the stone age.
You folks just love pumping out the disinformation eh.
-
6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
Actually his client, Lisa Swetnick, claimed to have gone to "up to ten parties where Kavanaugh and his friends were raping girls before it eventually happened to her".
Most of the girls that I know wouldn't go to a 2nd one, let alone a 3rd one, 4th one, 5th one... 10th... Even if what se was saying was true, it sounds like she wasn't really 'raped', she just waited her turn.
Leftists are so dumb that they'll believe ny accusation as long as it's against Republicans
Always amazed at how many of these folks end up with a book deal afterward.. who's paying the advance? ?
-
1
-
-
25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
Of course I'm not watching that horseshit.
I've seen people lie, and say things like "He grabbed the steering wheel", but that's not new: they've lied all along.
Trump clearly said "stroll peacefully to the capitol" and the dems/media said that he told them to "march on Washington", which is a big of a lie as you could possibly make. One means 'stroll to', the other means 'attack'.
You can get sucked in by all the propaganda you want, don't include me.
Kinda like that wierdo avenatti creep who the left adored there for awhile claiming Kavanaugh participated in a gang rape that nobody knew anything about until he just happened to be nominated to a seat on the SC that the Democrats didn't like.
Turns out the guy's doing time for extortion... go figure.
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:
No I’m a university educated professional while you’re a lonely shit-shoveler with grade school education who is so emotionally invested in his political identity you can’t even use your limited knowledge to grasp basic concepts
ONE MORE TIME FOR THE DROPOUTS IN THE CHEAP SEATS
1) As I’ve said several times already and none of you righties can grasp: Just because something isn’t explicitly banned under criminal laws doesn’t mean it’s allowed and permitted. FOR EXAMPLE:There a no criminal laws that specifically say a doctor can’t amputate your arm to treat a paper cut on your finger…do you think that means such a thing happens, or that doctors wouldn’t face consequences if they did so? ANSWER THE QUESTION
2) There are no abortions performed 1 minute before crowning or any such nonsense. In fact abortions after 20 weeks while perfectly legal in Canada are so rare and only medically acceptable in such exceptionally extreme situations that patients often have to be referred to the US because there just aren’t enough clinics with experience given the extreme rarity of it.
You are a cnn watcher who obeys like a good little sheepy.
University should be teaching you critical thought.. it's obvious it's teaching you to shut up and obey and peddle the sad dogma of the left wing void of any sort of moral compass
-
5 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:
14th amendment doesn’t have to list ever single possible way you are free from government overreach, just like the first amendment can simply say you have freedom of speech without listing every single thought ams idea you are free to say.
As for your hilarious ass- backwards opposite-of-reality bullshit, Democrats’ due process is exactly why Trump is walking around as a free man today. And if he had not received due process he would have just been thrown in jail and that would have been the end of it
Meanwhile Trump supporters showed absolutely no hesitation to ignore and circumvent due process when they tried to steal the 2020 election with the BIG LIE:
They falsely claimed without evidence that the 2020 election was rigged
They forged false lists of pro-Trump electors for states that they lost and sent them to Washington
After failing at over 60 legal attempts to present any evidence of of election fraud according to established due process, they falsely claimed Mike Pence authority to simply refuse to certify the election at his sole personal discretion and then they tried to pressure him into doing so
They formed a mob and attacked the Capitol to stop the election from being certified and for some to lynch Mike Pence
They stacked the USSC with highly partisan ideologues who just crank out right wing rulings often with limited explanation and without regard to decades of precedent.
And this is only a short list of Republicans creeping fascism. I don’t even think we can call it creeping anymore its more like approaching full gallop.
If it doesn't mention it in the constitution it resorts back to the voters. The politicians are responsible ultimately to the voter.. the ultimate in democracy. Just because leftists think the nonsense they make up violate a right doesn't make it so.
And no, Democrats are going full on nazi style right now. People are getting harassed over that Jan 6th bs and any lawyers who speak up are having their law offices raided. Stuff you'd expect in Sudan or China, not the US.
I notice how when a republican raises election integrity issues due to the hundreds of changed laws even up to the week of election is somehow a "threat to democracy". When democrats falsely claim the election machines are rigged as they did in 2016, what happens? The FBI launches a bogus investigation into the Trump Campaign.. talk about threat to democracy
-
I chose only for medical reasons. Still undecided on rape... would rather there be an "abort the rapist" option
-
10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
At around week 16 the fetus is making choices. It can taste what the mother recently ingested, and if they like it, they drink more amniotic fluid. If she eats something they don't like, or she smokes or drinks alcohol, it drinks less. That's how smoking causes low birth weight.
It's not viable at that point, but it's no longer just a blob of proteins. At ~ 7 months it can survive outside the womb. It's a 'baby', i.e. a 'human', it's just not born yet. Killing it is sickening.
It can most likely feel pain very early into the pregnancy.. don't think people get that
-
Just now, Aristides said:
Abortions are not done at 7 months unless it is an emergency and a baby certainly cannot survive outside the womb without extensive life support in a NICU.
I have a beautiful 8 yr old grand daughter who was born 6 weeks premature. She spent several weeks in a NICU before she could come home.
And you think the mother could just kill her at any time in the womb?
-
17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
People make choices that I would never make and that I don't respect all the time, but not all of them are worth bitching about.
The "choice" to kill healthy post-viability fetuses is worth more than just bitching about. It abhorrent.
Yes exactly. It's only not abhorrent to some as they've been conditioned to believe the baby in the womb is not an actual baby and have a very low view of the sanctity of life.
They try to make it an attack on religion when you don't need to be religious to see its disgusting
-
1
-
-
-
1 minute ago, BeaverFever said:
So what, she didn’t say it was invalid.
It is invalid and has been overturned.
S. 14 doesn't even discuss "reproductive rights". It does, however, discuss due process which Democrats have been attacking profusely by raiding law offices of attorneys of political opponents, bogus investigations into political adversaries, imprisonment without trial dates (people have been sitting in jail for a year for alleged participation in Jan 6 without access to lawyers and no trial dates) etc
They love to cry about "rights" that aren't in the constitution while trampling on rights that actually are in the constitution
-
6 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:
No what bullshit. Clearly this SCOTUS is made up of partisan hacks, by the way the Republican majority is ramming through partisan Republican decisions one after another. You really think they’re non-partisan? Hilarious.
Even RBG said your Roe ruling was problematic.
-
54 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:
A fertilized egg is not a baby.
Nowhere in the constitution does it mention anything about eggs, blastocysts, zygotes, embryos, fetuses or any other description of the “unborn”.
Nowhere does it say in the constitution that life begins when the baby exists the womb..
For the 7 unelected justices to arbitrarly decide in the 1970s when life begins is barbaric
-
29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
Stop egging the pro-abortion trolls on, they're not responding to logic and humanity. They're just getting sicker and sicker.
I don't think this is a healthy place for them.
Just exposing the baby hatred and disregard for life we know drives the religion of woke's dogma
-
1
-
-
35 minutes ago, Aristides said:
But pro lifers would put them in jail for having miscarriages.
You still continuing on with this lie eh
Ol Lady Nancy's husband's DUI
in Federal Politics in the United States
Posted · Edited by West
Who Hillary?
I know. She should've been locked up years ago. They locked up a Navyman for much less than her email server