Jump to content

West

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,508

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    31

 Content Type 

Posts posted by West

  1. Terrorist Attack in Canada (not BCT)

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    17 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

    Your employer's cares or lack thereof are irrelevant, since that's not where the mandates are coming from.  Your health and age are also not the only considerations considering a virus is a public health issue and go beyond Mr. West's selfish and obstinate whining. 

    Regardless, you've pivoted yourself away from the original debate and clearly lost the thread of the discussion.  

    You are the one using the r word like a tough guy. 

  6. Trucker's Convoy

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, blackbird said:

    "9  The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished: 

    10  But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities. {government: or, dominion}"   2 Peter 2:9, 10 KJV

    There's nothing godly about you. You profess to know God but your heart is far from him

    • Like 1

  7. Terrorist Attack in Canada (not BCT)

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted · Edited by West

    13 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

    "Injured?"  What does that even mean?  Where are those numbers again?  Still waiting... ?

    Even if your numbers are correct (doubtful!), how does a 1/10,000 chance of being "injured" by a needle compare to the same chances of being shot?

    This of course ignores the reality that the vaccine protects you from "injury" or "death" from a virus, whereas lining up to be potentially shot in the face by your employer would serves no observable purpose.  

    Great analogy man.  You really thought that one through!  ?

    Nonsense. 

    At my age and in my health I have statistically a zero percent chance of anything more than a seasonal cold. 

    Yet you are forcing me to take the shot... 

    You seriously think your employer would care if if weren't for the ridiculous isolation "close contact" requirements hahahaha

    You sir make no sense. 

  8. Terrorist Attack in Canada (not BCT)

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted · Edited by West

    12 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

    I'm not sure you really have a ground-in-reality understanding of what's happening in the first place, judging by the embarrassing analogy you presented.  The point of such an argument is to demonstrate similar/parallel reasoning, but yours faceplanted out of the gate.  You can't explain why employers would insist on whimsically murdering 1/10,000 of their workers as a condition of their employment, because that's an idiotic idea from the start.  

    The why behind the vaccine mandates are clear.  Whether or not you agree with them doesn't change that.  You can try to make your case on why the reasoning/justification for them is bad, but retarded analogies that make absolutely no sense aren't going to get you there.  They just make you look foolish.  

     

    Throwing out the r word.. yup you have a grasp on reality bud. 

    It's as idiotic as requesting your employees get vaccinated even though there's a 1 in 10,000 chance they'll be injured from the vaccine. That's the similarity bud.

    OK let's say the reason WHY they are doing it is because if they don't the government will randomly pull people out of work for 14 days unless they carry through the exercise...

  14. Terrorist Attack in Canada (not BCT)

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted · Edited by West

    6 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

    I can't find anything on it.  If you're going to throw the claim around and if it's such readily available information, please share it.  I'm willing to be proven wrong.  

    Or ones who come up with imbecilic hypothetical scenarios where employers shoot 1 in 10,000 of their employees for absolutely no reason, and think they're presenting valid arguments.  

     

    spongebob meme.jpg

    So my analogy is bad but what's actually happening is okay to you? 

    Good grief ?

    An absured policy calls for an absured analogy ?

  15. Terrorist Attack in Canada (not BCT)

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted · Edited by West

    3 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

    Do you have a good cite for that, or is from the trucker's protest website?  

    I'm sure when you wrote this up you thought it was a really sharp analogy.  It begs various questions, however, most notable among them being:

    1. In what retarded fantasy are we lining up to be shot at with guns (live ammunition or not)?

    2.  What are we trying to accomplish here? 

    3.  Why would my boss terminate my employment for not wanting to play along?"  

     

    Jeeze this has been cited several times. 

    Now you know how I feel about the sick obsession with mass vaccinating everyone. 

    I have absolutely no doubt that psychologists and sociologists will be studying warped folks like yourself in the years to come when this is all set and done

     

  16. Terrorist Attack in Canada (not BCT)

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted · Edited by West

    10 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

    So in your mind, the horror of being fined/penalized for not following public health guidelines and getting a needle that's been proven safe around the world is every bit as awful as being beat up or shot senselessly by police.

    Okay dude.  

     

     

       
     

    Dude 1 in 10000 are getting injured from the thing. 

    So a large employer of about 10000 people forces all his employees to line up along the wall. Uses a handful of firearms holding just one single bullet. You don't know which one will be shot but you know one of them will causing either injury or death. Injuries include anything from needing surgery to a minor flesh wound. One by one "click" "click" "click". 

    He tells all his employees if you don't stand along the wall and allow him to pull the trigger that they will lose their jobs. 

    People use the law of probability.. there's a "low chance" of the bullet going off when they are against the wall. They like their job and decide to go along with it. 

    Some people aren't willing to go along with it so he fires them.

    You think this little experiment would be ethical?

  20. Trucker's Convoy

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    1 hour ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

     

    Some things are worth fighting for...have you never protested anything for fear of getting a "criminal record" ?   And why are you so worried about them visiting the U.S. ?    Seems kind of ironic to me.

    Stay safe...let others do the hard work of keeping liberty.

    When the state goes bonkers like this, an arrest is a badge of honor

  24. Terrorist Attack in Canada (not BCT)

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted · Edited by West

    4 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

    It's structurally the same garbage reasoning.  If you could calm yourself down for a moment and break both statements down, you'd see they're based on the same faulty logic. 

    Yet one group is getting arrested and having their accounts seized... thats the point.. 

    One group he supports. The other he calls a bunch of nazis and calls in the police to clear out through unilateral emergency powers

×
×
  • Create New...