Jump to content

West

Senior Member
  • Posts

    8,793
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    40

Everything posted by West

  1. More like a dude pretending to be a lady. Anyway No wonder why leftists are so angry
  2. Tight which stemmed out of a bogus Russia collusion narrative. Very few if anyone have been charged with that. He was chosen and targeted to deflect from the debacle that was the Clinton campaign. Well that and there was nothing to flip on. In the words of great legal scholars "they not only sing but compose" meaning make up sh^t to appease crazies looking to target and take them out. This time for political purposes. Lisa Page was the attorney for the debacle and there were folks submitting phony applications to the fisa court lying in their submission.. an attorney was charged for this. Peter Strzok wasn't just one guy but one of the LEAD guys on the nonsense. You are delusional
  3. He pardoned manafort because the investigation was a joke and was what the nazis did.. this is America. I get you think people who disagree with you shouldn't be allowed to do so
  4. There's more evidence that Biden was accepting Chinese bribes than of Russian collusion No I'm looking at the totality of the evidence.
  5. This is nonsense. If YOU were being investigated by somebody who claimed they were doing so as an "insurance policy" so that you couldn't be elected to political office I would be saying the same thing. The fact you call this an irrelevant detail is bullshit I would if there was four years of investigation and the best you came up with was a Senator talking to an Ambassador.
  6. Again, the guy doing the investigation said this was an insurance policy. Forgive me for being skeptical
  7. Exactly. And there's ample evidence any information was tainted by FBI agents who wanted to overthrow am election result
  8. No what's pathetic is you continuing on with something that's already been looked at at determined to have no merit. Why is it so hard for you to believe that Hillary lost legitimately? Why do you not answer why I should take the FBI seriously when their agents were talking about insurance policies in the event of Trump presidency. DO YOU THINK ITS PROPER FOR FBI AGENTS TO HAVE INSURANCE POLICIES IN CASE THEIR PREFERRED CANDIDATE LOSES?
  9. Trump won because of Hillarys moronic statements about putting coal miners out of business and rigged an fing primary which ticked off alot of people that chose to stay home and not vote rather than voting for her. Add to that she should've been in jail just like any other military personel that would breach security for her email server. This russia bs is just deflection from those FACTS. We have TEXT MESSAGES from the FBI agents showing the collusion delusion was just an insurance policy against a Trump presidency and that there was nothing to the claims. Yet you still want me to believe whatever you say?
  10. ?.. Again, just justification for a bogus investigation. If they could credibly prove what you say they WOULDVE CHARGED SOMEONE. I realize the press had a vested interest in proving the collusion delusion because they peddled it for four years and lost ALL CREDIBILITY.
  11. There's no evidence Kilminik was Russian intelligence nor that Manafort knew he was Russian intelligence and gave him publicly available polling data to interfere in an election. There's also no evidence this was illegal and is within constitutional rights to associate with whomever the hell you want to They had to legitimize an investigation because they filed false applications to a secret court to usurp the constitutional rights of freedom from unreasonable search of several American citizens. Democrats had to save face after lying for close to 5 years about collusion. That's all it is. Either way Hillary didn't lose because of Russia. She lost because it was uncovered she rigged her own primary and then told people in swing states she was going to put them out of work. Furthermore it was obvious Comey gave her special treatment when he chose not to indict and Bill had the infamous secret meeting with Loretta Lynch just days before they let her off. Blame Russia all you like but Hillary did it to herself. And collusion allegations were just the "insurance policy" in case she lost.
  12. Manafort ran a lobbying firm with his buddy Tony Podesta, the brother of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager in Europe. Welcome to Washington where you sell your lobbying services to whomever Everything is nefarious when you are sold on conspiracy theories ie a Senator meeting with a Russian Ambassador. But a Democrat Senator boinking a Chinese spy? Nothing to see there ?
  13. Could've been manafort trying to brag about how he was leading a POLITICAL NOVICE to an election win with a fraction of the budget over a woman with quite possibly the most well funded, well connected campaign in American history? Maybe looking for work after the campaign? I mean Crooked had the entire establishment media behind her. The intelligence community. All of Washington. The business community yet STILL lost. Because "Russia" spent a few thousand dollars in facebook ads? Amazing..and embarrassing that this is the story. But I could see why she's still trying to blame "Russia" for the greatest election defeat in American history. Why did she lose? Quite simple... she said out loud that she was going to put people in swing states out of work.. but RUSSIA. ?
  14. You are trying to alter history. There's no evidence Kilminik was Russian intelligence other than DEMOCRATS making up delusions. The polling data that was given he could've gotten with a Google search. He was a business guy Lol.. this is honestly so pathetic. You were duped. Now you claim that you were actually right but Mueller just couldn't connect the dots despite four years and an unlimited budget. A normal person would say "hey maybe there's no dots to connect and I'm just not right on this one'" but not you.. you go full boar on the conspiracy theory ?.. Couldn't connect but Trump is actually guilty.. hilarious
  15. 1. Still doesn't mean that Trump COLLUDED with anybody... only delusional buffoons think otherwise 2. Comey was a dirty cop and the text messages PROVE there was "no there there" ACCORDING TO HIS OWN FBI AGENTS yet they held the entire country hostage anyway 3. Lol.. more fing nonsense. Kilmniak was a BUSINESS PERSON not a government official you IMBECILE. The Democrats tried to KEEP THE DELUSION GOING with their senate report but it was a piece of ?
  16. 1. This NEVER HAPPENED 2. Comey deserved to be fired because he targeted a political campaign and ran surveillance using fraudulent FISA applications. NOBODY SHOULD BE OKAY WITH ANOTHER ADMINISTRATION MONITORING A RIVAL POLITICAL CAMPAIGN. This isn't fing China pal
  17. 1. Sessions recused himself because folks like you thought it was criminal for a Senator to do Senator stuff and meet with foreign ambassadors to the United States. If you think that it's okay to make fake allegations then choose every normal political interaction as evidence of some DELUSION that you had, you are a lost cause. 2. It's not nonsense. We have the TEXT MESSAGES that shows the top FBI agents had an "insurance policy" in the event that Trump won and FISA applications were full of fiction. They also didn't disclose key details such as the information they were relying on for the HOAX was coming from a political campaign . Whether or not Comey is a RINO is IRRELEVANT to the timeline. That is Comey cooked up the delusions alongside Hillary DURING AND SHORTLY AFTER THE ELECTION WHILE BARRY WAS IN OFFICE and fed them to the American public to then launch a criminal investigation which by your own admission NO CRIMES WERE EVEN PRESENT BECAUSE EVEN IF TRUE COLLUSION ISNT A CRIME. The investigation was already WELL UNDERWAY before Trump was inaugurated. Trump fired Comey for being a DIRTY COP which is when everyone cried for a special council. Then in came Mueller TO CLEAN UP COMEYS MESS.
  18. Sessions had nothing to do with the scam. He was falsely accused of working with Russia as well for meeting with the Russian Ambassador. The facts are Jim Comey had already fired up an ILLEGAL investigation into non crimes before Trumps inauguration. His top FBI agents called it an "insurance policy" to get who they wanted in power and to usurp the will of the voters
  19. "Trump's doj" lol.. they were holdover from the Obama administration. Say what you want about Fox, their legal experts said all along this was nonsense and they turned out to be correct.
  20. Bud I've listened to all the evidence and if you can't acknowledge the predicate for this investigation was a sham you don't deserve to vote. People like YOU are why your country is in shambles
  21. They were trivial technicalities and NONE were related to Russia collision. You are an fing liar and its sad. Just cause you bought into hillarys delusions and can't come to grips with the fact that people don't support your perverted world view lol. And I'm NOT the one who claimed COLLUSION. This was a DELUSIONAL CONSPIRACY THEORY that was the predicate for an investigation. As you point out and I agree with you COLLUSION ISNT A CRIME. But what you fail to recognize is that by using this nonsense as a predicate, the FBI acted OUTSIDE THE LAW and used it as a FISHING EXPEDITION against a sitting president. They then found obscure laws to go after his associates. NO MATTER HOW YOU FD UP PEOPLE TRY TO SPIN IT THIS ABUSE OF POWER IS THE REAL ISSUE HERE. It was an ILLEGITIMATE PREMISE to start an investigation The entire Mueller investigation was just a fishing expedition used to interfere with the legitimate policy mandate of a DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT and was more of a threat to democracy than anything Donnie was falsely accused of
  22. Their role was to look into Hillary's CONSPIRACY THEORIES of Russian collusion which were NOT crimes as you have already said. They filled out FISA warrants using falsified information to SPY on a rival campaign, then used false information from a FOREIGN SPY fed by those connected to the KREMLIN to stall the implementation of an agenda ratified through an ELECTION. They went through EVERY aspect of Trump and those close to hims lives and managed to find some forms that were incorrectly filled out or not filled. They then used an obscure law to cover up and justify SPYING on a presidential candidate and using the FBI to abuse their powers to investigate a political candidate even tho you ADMIT NO CRIME EXISTED. They harassed a sitting president AND HIS KIDS over a DELUSIONAL CONSPIRACY THEORY that wasn't a crime to begin with The fact that you are ok with this type of bullshit shows that you are not to be taken seriously. YOU WOULD SIDE WITH ADOLF HITLER AND THEIR BROKEN GLASS POLICY AND GESTAPO AS WELL
  23. No it's not. You are engaging in revisionist history here. The mandate the Mueller team had was to investigate collusion with the Russians. You are ADMITTING collusion isn't a crime THEREFORE NO INVESTIGATION SHOULD'VE HAPPENED TO BEGIN WITH. Instead they set perjury traps and combed through taxes to ensure the correct obscure forms from a law very seldom ever discussed were filled out. Very definition of a Nazi show trial
  24. You haven't answered my question. The FBI was investigating NON CRIMES for no other reason than to delay/impede/interfere in the WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE and Trump's ability to implement his agenda as was voted on by the American public. This was because Hillary CRIED about losing an election. Biggest FRAUD on the American public of all time. They hung low level Trump guys on an obscure law from the 1800s. And you think this investigation had any legitimacy? Wow. Dumb
×
×
  • Create New...