Jump to content

West

Senior Member
  • Posts

    8,781
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    40

Everything posted by West

  1. I don't want coke heads carrying around firearms.
  2. Your leftist sites are often full of shit. If you actually wanted to make a dent in gun crimes you'd look at handgun restrictions. The problem with talking gun control with a raging leftist is they don't really understand the issue and are force fed bullshit on the issue. Several were not during that time jackass. You also made up the nonsense about there being a decline when in fact the evidence is not conclusive There are still restrictions on fully automatic riffles and calling them "military style" is misleading
  3. Thanks for the link There is insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of the ban on reducing the overall homicide rate as well as the total firearm homicide rate. What does it matter? Coke heads shouldn't have access to firearms
  4. It impacted public perception going into an election If they got criminals like Hunter Biden off the street years ago instead of his dad running cover for him the streets would be much safer
  5. Says they'd news F15s when he wants to take them out. Sick puppy
  6. It is if you are acting as an expert. You'd agree that Brennans words would carry more weight than a schmuck like you or I? Why do you let your experts get away with such blatant nonsense and still demand we all listen after they've shown themselves to be phonies?
  7. No Republicans are primarily against nonsensical regulations like a gun registry. As for an AR15 these are semi automatics which have really never been illegal in the US
  8. This is nonsense. There's nothing that democrats have proposed that would make any difference to gun crime
  9. Republicans are for responsible gun ownership. This is what we've been telling you jackasses.. the NRA doesn't support crack heads having access to firearms and there are already federal laws in place to deal with criminal behavior. This case was a prime example
  10. The Democrat propagandists may be next
  11. Yup.. Hunter had the full weight of government behind him. Meh. The US government has interfered in every election imaginable while denying they are doing it. At least I'm upfront
  12. They should've kept their conspiracy mumbo jumbo to themselves instead of abusing their titles and positions of authority to create a false narrative
  13. You know you folks could really lead the way in bringing the country together if you'd stop reading your nonsensical conspiracy theories into the public record. Get back to debating tax reform and stop the abuse of American institutions Aid Biden in an election and interfer in a criminal investigation
  14. 😆.. yes former Intel officers should just blindly throw out a conspiracy theory to kill a story that would've probably impacted the election while the guy was under criminal investigation
  15. They should be prosecuted for obstruction because they knew the laptop was real and then defamed America's mayor, giving the illusion that he committed a crime by working with Russia, and interfered in a criminal investigation in the process. They acted as experts to muddy the waters. It's much different than you or I getting the facts wrong as I don't claim to be an expert. Why you support breaking the law here is beyond me.
  16. I never lied about shit. The fact is these people knew what they were doing a inserted falsehoods into a presidential election cycle and interfered in a criminal probe into Hunter Biden
  17. There's a bit more to it than that. They killed the story on social media you seem to forget... banning the New York Post account for a factual story on Twitter and then proceed to portray America's Mayor in false light. All to kill a legitimate story and to engage in election interference. And now we find to obstruct a federal investigation into the crimes of Biden’s son. Spin how you want... it's disgraceful
  18. If the Democrats had any integrity they'd be locking up Brennan and the multiple Intel professionals who signed the nonsense about Russia for obstruction of justice
  19. Uh ya. It was a private consult between a man and his lawyer. If I'm going to go in for a consult with a lawyer I'm expecting they aren't going to get me charged with a crime.
  20. It's implied by the guys profession, jackass. The man had a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of his client and not bring harm on him.
  21. Uh no.. if anything the recording is exculpatory evidence between a man and his lawyer. Facts of the matter is you all spread a bullshit conspiracy theory about Russia somehow fabricating his laptop. Your Intel lied. Very sick. Your boy Brennan and the loonies at CNN tried to cover up a federal crime. Very sad
  22. Except there's actually hard evidence Cunter committed a crime
  23. Are you now ready to admit his laptop wasn't from the Russian government as you kooks screamed loudly to rig an election?
  24. The Democrats have been doing a soft coup for years by using lawfare against political opponents
×
×
  • Create New...