BeaverFever

Jesus Christ. Are you slow or what? I replied to a post from Shady and you barged in to annoy me with your critical race theory rantings. The right wing rantings on this thread are the horseshit. Get it?

Uh wrong again. Shady said Democrats, Einstein. And Where did I deny its existence? Two wrongs make right wing, it seems

Show me where a Democrat said “those of a certain skin colour are born racist. ” As I said horse shit

The belief that “critical race theory” (however you define it) is some kind of grand plot that’s ruining your life....that is right wing horseshit.

I’m not pro-anything here just calling out the right wing horseshit.

“Fight the power” doesn’t mean drop out of school. Give me an example of Democrats telling kids school is a waste of time.

What a load of garbage. You forgot the part about eating babies and kicking puppies

Sure it does. I’m not saying don’t punish the perp but you don’t need to fear for safety if you don’t have a 0% crime rate and you don’t need to fear for your democracy because of isolated incidents. It would take many thousands of fraudulent voters i. Rje same local area just to sway ONE district/riding let alone the millions needless to sway the outcome nationally or even state-wide

One person. And didn't it turn out that she voted republican in the last election including voting for the prosecutor who eventually came after her?? https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/4798922002 Where is the proof that voter fraud is rampant in either country? In his first year, Trump assembled a witch hunt panel to find the alleged millions of illegal voters but the panel disbanded quietly very soon afterwards after finding nothing.

No but I’m glad to hear that since the Democrats were the slave owning real racists you guys won't have any concerns with us tearing down those confederate statues after all. Right?

Well I guess I got the righty lie that hew was a grand wizard mixed up I guess you conveniently missed the part where he regretted the brief klan experience in his youth and had written extensively over the decades about how much he regrets it. You probably also overlooked the part where it said he was a conservative despite being a Democrat, which has always been the case with the south. They have always been conservative. Since before the time of slavery. The only thing that changed is that the Democrats stopped welcoming conservatives.

Btw Byrd was never a “cyclops” that’s more right wing horseshit And here’s Trump retweeting white supremacist propaganda fake news garbage

Listen to this non-sensical drivel it sounds like the rantings of a crazy person: According to one decades-old unverified claim from some random guy, Saul Alinsky got a few students to dress up in Klan costumes at some obscure event and that one tiny stunt permanently fooled all of Americans into falsely thinking the Klan supports Republicans which they actually do but only because the Klan and neo nazis love America and they know what’s best for it. Riiight that makes perfect sense Makes you long fo the days where at least the conservative lies tried to follow some kind of coherent narrative So the Democrats want to tear down confederate statues and the confederate flag because they’re pro-slavery and pro-segregation. Meanwhile Republicans and Trump especially want to protect and restore them because they’re anti-slavery and anti-segregation Trump tweets out lies like blacks are responsible for almost all murdersof white peoples but the real White supremacists are Ilhan omar, AOC, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton The Democrats are white supremacists but want unlimited third world immigration, affirmative action and white genocide. Also minor fact check: The KKK was never “a wing of the Democratic party.“

Another debunked conservative conspiracy theory 1) So? Whats YOUR point? 2)It should have been to the cops that there’s something wrong. 1) Prove that bullshit 2) So you admit KKK supports Trump anyway. But didn’t you just say KKK is Democrats? Also KKK wizard David Duke ran for office as a Republican decades ago and is also currently a Trump supporter. “Sure” is not a denouncement. Thats One word. That’s why they responded to it bu asking him to go ahead and say it then. He couldn’t bring himself to say anything bad about white supremacists at the very least because he wants their votes. Everything in you above quote is simply a lie. Full stop. Also Republicans like to claim dem CITIES have higher crime because most large cities are run by Democrats. When you look at state data though most of the highest crime states are Republican. https://www.statista.com/statistics/200445/reported-violent-crime-rate-in-the-us-states/

It’s total cherry-picking. Telling us about the number of federal senators elected but not congressmen, or state officials for example? Here’s an excerpt from a detailed description, pay attention to the bold part at the very end .....The idea of swinging the South to the Republicans was not Phillips’s invention, as he readily admitted. White southerners had been drifting away from their traditional party ties for decades. In the late 1930s, southern Democrats in Congress had forged a “conservative coalition” with like-minded Republicans to fight New Deal liberalism. Despite this working alliance, southern Democratic congressmen remained in the party—not least because Democrats dominated Congress and, as a result, their seniority within the party guaranteed them a good deal of power in the committee system. But the “Dixiecrat” rebellion of 1948, led by South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond, showed that party ties weren’t permanent*. In that campaign, southern officials and ordinary white southerners alike began to abandon the Democrats over civil rights. Republican leaders saw an opening. Guy Gabrielson, the chairman of the Republican National Committee from 1949 to 1952, hoped to bring disaffected Dixiecrats into the GOP. “The Dixiecrat Party believes in states’ rights,” he told an Alabama gathering in 1952. “That’s what the Republican Party believes in.” Seeking to craft a coalition of southern Democrats and northeastern Republicans, Gabrielson commenced negotiations for what he called a “trial marriage at the top” in which nominally independent Dixiecrats would pledge to support the Republican nominee in 1952. Gabrielson’s scheme never came to fruition, but the GOP nominee still cracked the solid South: Dwight Eisenhower won three southern or border states in 1952 (Florida, Tennessee, and Virginia) and five in 1956 (Florida, Tennessee, Louisiana, Kentucky, and Virginia). As he prepared for his own run for president, Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater likewise tried to bring white southern conservatives into the Republican fold. But rather than proposing a partnership between the South and the Northeast, Goldwater wanted to connect southern Democrats with libertarians and conservatives in the Southwest and West. In a 1961 speech to southern Republicans in Atlanta, Goldwater famously declared that the GOP should “hunt where the ducks are” by writing off “the Negro vote” and pursuing southern whites instead. Capitalizing on the white southern backlash against civil rights was central to this strategy. But by the mid-1960s, overt racism was an ineffective method of courting southern voters. The region’s most successful politicians adopted more muted appeals to racial issues, and Goldwater proved to be a skilled practitioner of this approach. Instead of “direct racist appeals,” he used “a kind of code that few in his audiences had any trouble deciphering,” noted The New Yorker in 1964. In making federal involvement in social, cultural, and economic issues the ostensible focus of his opposition, rather than race itself, Goldwater managed to reassure the South that he would protect the status quo while simultaneously appealing to the libertarian sensibilities of the West and Southwest. “I believe that it is both wise and just for Negro children to attend the same schools as whites,” Goldwater wrote in The Conscience of a Conservative. “I am not prepared, however, to impose that judgment of mine on the people of Mississippi or South Carolina … Social and cultural change, however desirable, should not be effected by the engines of national power.” Goldwater lost the 1964 election in a national landslide to Lyndon Johnson, but the election returns showed a silver lining for the GOP. Aside from his home state of Arizona, the only states Goldwater won were in the Deep South—Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Louisiana. While Eisenhower had made inroads in the South by adding states from the region’s edges to his national coalition, Goldwater focused on the “ducks” of the Deep South, and with convincing results. Mississippi’s path was instructive: While GOP nominees had won less than 25 percent of the state’s vote in 1956 and 1960, Goldwater took a whopping 87 percent in 1964. Moreover, his southern coattails helped elect a new generation of Republican congressmen, whose vocal opposition to civil rights had been the centerpiece of their own campaigns. (In an extreme example, Prentiss Walker, the first Republican congressman from Mississippi in a century, celebrated his 1964 victory with an appearance before a Ku Klux Klan front called Americans for the Preservation of the White Race.).... https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/595504/ And here is a campaign strategy memo from the Nixon library Note the strategy re “Negroes” https://cdn.nixonlibrary.org/01/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/02130151/White-House-Special-Files-Box-36-Folder-7.pdf

PragerU rightwing garbage rots your brain

5 years from now it will be and you conveniently won’t be able to remember denying it. The conservatives have used their selective memory before. Just like how the conservatives SWORE Saddam had WMD that could hit America in 45 minutes and screamed that the dems were traitors putting us all in danger for not supporting their invasion.... now all they remember Ilianthe invasion being bipartisan and don’t recall any controversy at all

Point is he was a dixecrat segregationist who became Republican because that’s where they all went back then when the Democrats decided to renounce segregation and support civil rights.

Just like the moon landing right? That’s the level of denial required to believe your nonsense

Oh another false flag reverse psychology crackpot conspiracy theory. They endorsed Trump because they wanted Hillary to win. Got it!? I don’t know, Bush’s invasion of Iraq is exactly what the terrorists wanted. They got to eliminate their secular enemy Saddam Hussein, fight the infidels in their own Muslim land, humiliate the US military for years on end. Terrorists can get in to the US no matter who is in charge, what they want is a military adventurist who will give them their holy wars overseas. To his credit, Trump is unusual - almost unique - among Republicans in that so far he doesn’t really seem interested in fighting foreign wars. He knelt on the guys neck for 7 minutes while bystanders screamed that he's unconscious. The cop is still charged with murder. Your Non-expert crackpot interpretation that’s been verified by absolutely nobody isn’t “proof” of anything So when we see KKK and Neo Nazis at unite the right rallies and supporting Trump and it means they’re Democrats. Riiiight. Because “Saul Alinsky”. He “did something”. Friggin ridiculous It is not a fact that Blacks fare worse in Dem cities. And you don’t understand what defeund the police means but that’s a whole separate topic on its own. No you’re not paying attention. How many times do I have to say this. After the civil rights act the Democrats began to come around to it lead mostly by the northern wing of the party which was not overwhelmingly racist. Then the racist southern Democrats began to leave the party and then the republicans scooped them up starting with Goldwater. Why do you think the south is majority republican today? Republican Strom Thurmond is a perfect example. That’s a complete lie and false transcript Where did you get it? Some crackpot email list? Nobody coached him to say “stand down” and that’s not even what he said. They asked him to denounce the group and after trying to redirect and deflect all he could come up with was “stand back and stand by” Hardly a denouncement (SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING) PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: I would say almost everything I see is from the left wing, not from the right wing. CHRIS WALLACE: So what are you... TRUMP: If you look... WALLACE: What are you saying... TRUMP: I'm willing to do anything - I want to see peace. WALLACE: Well, then do it, sir. JOE BIDEN: Say it. Do it. Say it. TRUMP: Do you want to call them - what do you want to call them? Give me a name. Give me a name. Go ahead... WALLACE: White supremacists and right-wing militia. (CROSSTALK) TRUMP: Who would you like me to condemn? BIDEN: The Proud Boys. TRUMP: Who? BIDEN: The Proud Boys. TRUMP: The Proud Boys, stand back, and stand by. But I'll tell you what. I'll tell you what - somebody's got to do something about antifa and the left because this is not a right-wing problem.

Uh no read the part where it says he changed parties because he DIDN’T have a change of heart. I added it to my post

I guess you didn’t read your own link about Thurmond did you? It’s what I’ve been saying tue whole time Is this forum for people who never tool high school history or something? It says: Thurmond represented South Carolina in the United States Senate from 1954 until 2003, at first as a Southern Democrat and then, from 1964 onwards, as a Republican. ... A magnet for controversy during his nearly half-century Senate career, Thurmond switched parties in 1964, primarily because of his vehement opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and endorsed Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater. In the months before switching, he had "been critical of the Democratic Administration for ... enactment of the Civil Rights Law",[2] while Goldwater "boasted of his opposition to the Civil Rights Act, and made it part of his platform."[3]

You are being racially divisive by advancing a racially divisive and false message. You're actually fear-mongering against police. That's a fact. FYI police are not committing genocide against blacks, they're not even in the top 20 killers of black people. Black people, even criminals who are black, are completely safe when they're being arrested if they're just polite. Sharks and murderers are still dangerous if you're polite with them. Police are not. Therefor, police are not dangerous. It's just your own stupidity that gets you killed. Eg, if Brionna's boyfriend hadn't shot at cops she'd still be alive. If Rayshard hadn't shot a taser at a cop's head, he'd still be alive. If Michael Brown hadn't tried to wrestle a cop's gun away from him, he'd still be alive. If you're not like those idiots, you've got no more to worry about than a white person who gets arrested. Police abuse or misuse their power all the time, against white people too. Blacks and POC just end up on the receiving end more often. This is true in Canada but especially the US. Your whole argument is that the victims of police brutality like Trayvonn and Brionna are to blame because they didn’t properly debase and subjugate themselves to overzealous police even though they did nothing wrong to attract the police in the first place. Republicans supposedly believe in all this stand your ground castle doctrine principles, support all these armed standoffs like Ruby Ridge Wacco and the Bundys where white people are actually breaking the law and taking up arms against authorities but not apparently for innocent law abiding people of certain complexions who are minding their own business are targeted for one reason or another. Let alone those like Flloyd who were committing some minor offence and were killed. Cite required? Really you missed that one? https://www.google.ca/amp/s/thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/303903-kkk-newspaper-embraces-trump-in-front-page-article%3famp Th KKK Newspaper :

So republicans are opposed to the confederate and democrats promote it, is that opposite-from-reality world you live in?

And which party is more opposed to it?