Legato

Straight from the Antifa handbook. Do try a more factual source.

Who's on first?

"No, most think taking away a persons rights because of their choice of sexuality was/is an issue. The only reason you fools are on this is because your orange idol decided to make it part of his narrative. ~10 trans out of ~550K NCAA athletes and it's one of society's most pressing concerns.... 😂" "The subject was/is about climate change so of course you would think asking about transvestites and unborn children are normal questions. That's what you clowns do.." "They have been. Just not usually in a conversation about climate change." "You and your crowd are freaking stunned. For christ sakes....the topic is about climate change and you id*ots feel the need to talk about transvestites and unborn children. Really.... " Yes really, who's on first.

Bist du mit Joseph Goebbels verwandt?

None, and has eff all to do with what Poilievre said. You know that. So why the knee jerk response.

Again, the very large number of 3. Which means that the CBC bought shares in Proctor & Gamble.

The above nonsense aside, what is it that Poilievre said that's not true?

You must have burnt out the clutch, that sound you hear is cogs having a dissonance.

but they did.....3 did not, wow, batman did it without robin.

3? Wow, that's earth shattering.

The risk statement was yours, therefore you must be misunderstanding the misunderstanding and is therefore your problem. Then please read it. A factual statement is never meaningless. If you don't understand the statement then at least make some attempt to form an understanding. In that regard, responding with an analogy is also meaningless.

yes you did, you happy now?

Examples seem to extremely evasive . Water loss due to over use and fracking, did you even read what was said. This has been said many times...the climate always has, is and always will continue to change.

and the other clowns come out to give us all a laugh with the knee jerks, flailing arms and gnashing of teeth.

Risks, your term, back it up. Water costs. You mean groundwater over extractions, mans greed, or water loss due to fracking, oops not climate.

It was your "strategic" voting weakness that caused the Liberal "win". All those little NDP "brains" doing exactly what the CBC told them, go vote for the Liberal pansy.

Bit of good news......

The media has a large effect on many, they keep electing the corrupt Liberals. Did you somehow think the voting population reads tealeaves?

Whomever the Conservatives pick as a leader will come under severe vilification from the likes of the bought and paid for CBC, CTV, Grope and Fail etc, etc. You do see that, don't you?

Just that your "facts" become laughable when presented with a severe dose of TDS. If you want something to whine about do the same for your supreme leader the Carney. We all know where your sun shines from.

The annual inflation rate in the US slowed to 2.4% in January 2026, its lowest level since May, down from 2.7% in each of the previous two months and below forecasts of 2.5%. The deceleration largely reflects base effects, as higher readings from a year ago drop out of the annual calculation. Price pressures eased notably in the energy sector, with prices falling 0.1%, after a 2.3% rise in December, led by gasoline (-7.5% vs -3.4%) and fuel oil (-4.2% vs 7.4%). Prices of natural also rose at a slightly slower pace (9.8% vs 10.8%). A decline was also seen in prices for used cars and trucks (-2% vs 1.6%) while inflation slowed for food (3.1% vs 2.9%) and shelter (3% vs 3.2%). On a monthly basis, the CPI rose by 0.2%, below 0.3% in December and forecasts of 0.3%. Annual core inflation eased to 2.5%, its lowest reading since March 2021, compared with 2.6% in the prior month and in line with expectations. On a monthly basis, core CPI increased by 0.3%, slightly above 0.2% in December. source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics US unemployment rate 4.4% Canada 6.6% BBB? Heealthcare cuts "may", "suggested", "possibly" the rest........