Jump to content

Infidel Dog

Senior Member
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by Infidel Dog

  1. 4 hours ago, Contrarian said:

    Right Wing Troll Alert -->  

    Ha, that was mild. 

    I like my favourite right wing archive site. This one.

    Whenever they get a  Shifty Schiff story they don't use his name. They say the 'Bug-eyed, Burbank, Bolshevik.'

    I think every time we catch the left, or liars that are but say they aren't, in a lie we should tell them they're 'Talking Schiff."

    Because I don't think I've ever heard anything come out of the bug-eyed, Burbank, Bolshevik's mouth that wasn't a lie.

  2. I don't watch any of that CSI, FBI crap.

    If I want to watch far out fantasy I'll watch far out fantasy that isn't BS-ing me they represent reality.

    Reality forensics lacks the magical, all-covering infallibility I see on those shows. Start there.

    FBI shows, especially. I haven't seen one but I bet there aren't episodes about monitoring and harassing parents for not wanting their daughters to share a change room with a guy with a dingle dangle.

    That sort of thing would be the reality of the new FBI. 

  3. 28 minutes ago, eyeball said:

    I know, but there's nothing odd about rubber and glue when it's all you guys do. 

    I'd expect you to be used to that by now when all you've got to start a conversation with are insults.

    Don't want to be topped? Stop laying claim to the bottom.

    • Like 1
  4. 25 minutes ago, eyeball said:

    Maybe for as long as it takes to give your head a shake but only a simpleton would spend any time dwelling on them. 

    Oddly enough that's the way I feel about some of the nutty things you obsess over. But we already know yours turned out to be false. Still think the unvaccinated need to be mandated out of polite society but think the clot shot protects you from infection? Actually you should have pegged that one as illogical if not nutty when you were pushing it.

    • Like 4
    • Downvote 1
  5. 17 hours ago, robosmith said:

    In 2007 that was NOT illegal. "The Stock Act" passed almost unanimously and signed by Obama made it illegal in 2012.

    As I understand it the difference between the stock act and Josh Hawley's act is the Stock act pretty much just told congress insider trading was naughty and they shouldn't do that. Josh Hawley's act says flat out they can't trade stocks.

  6. No. My claim was precisely what I quoted.

    The video noting an NBC report which turned out to be almost all true had been disappeared by NBC  and was trickling out anyway was reason to make one suspicious. I claimed that sort of thing was going to happen after the midterms. That was correct. I'm a frickin' Nostradamus.

    And I'd still like to know why they held up the body cam footage with the Pelosi attack. Did you hear they released the body cam footage on the Tyre Nichols assault by police today?

  7. Where's the evidence saying it's just a coincidence that Paul knows precisely when to buy and sell and it always coincidentally lines up with something like a coming cancellation of subsidies or an upcoming investigation?

    You're always asking for evidence, Evidence boy? You're never offering any. 


  8. 2 hours ago, robosmith said:

    So released body cam video clearly shows ^this is BULLSHIT. Big surprise there. LMAO

    Pelosi opened the door with DePape holding his arm and  pulling him back into the room and beaten with the hammer AFTER the police told DePape to drop the hammer. Maybe that was a poor choice of words. LMAO

    You've been CONNED, AGAIN. Don't you ever get tired of that embarrassment? AKA trusting right wing propaganda.

    First of all, what are you talking about? My claim was "the midterms are over and those of us who suspected the truth wouldn't start to trickle out until after they were over were correct"

    What about that is false? Why didn't they just release the body cam footage right away like they do for other media event crimes?

    If people started jumping to conclusions based on only available snippets of information how is that a surprise? Apparently that disappeared NBC report that had people guessing was correct about everything except Pelosi stepping back towards DePape. They could have stopped that confusion by releasing the footage. But they didn't. I'd still like to know why not.

  9. 5 hours ago, robosmith said:

    Anything based in insider Congressional info came from BEFORE "The STOCK Act" which was signed by OBAMA in 2012.

    Do you even have an answer to MY QUESTION which YOU QUOTED?

    I could give you a better answer than the silly one you gave me to where did Nancy's money come from. "She made it before the 2012 stock act" did she?  Don't be ridiculous.

    So what do they want from this new bill that they didn't get from the stock act of 2012. Actionable results preventing stuff like this:


    Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) and her multimillionaire husband sold up to $3 million in shares of Google in recent weeks—just before the Biden Justice Department launched an antitrust probe of the tech giant.


    The trades are the latest in a string of questionable transactions for Paul and Nancy.

    They saved roughly $600,000 in June by selling shares of microchip maker Nvidia weeks before the U.S. government placed restrictions on the company's business in China and Russia. The Pelosis have seen their fortune grow $140 million since 2008, thanks largely to Paul Pelosi's stock trades, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.

    Pelosi's stock market charades have sparked calls for tougher regulations on members of Congress cashing in on their positions of power.


  10. 4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

    If I may interject...

    That Jan 6 report is nothing more than the product of a bunch of biased dweebs, justifying their hatred anyway they can.

    Most of it is BS.

    And now...a real investigation can take place by a republican committee. 

    True, but even if you're prone to believe it all it says is the committee believes there was no cause to believe on Jan. 5 that Antifa would be there en masse the next day causing conflict with Trump supporters.

    No problem. Nobody is contending that. The contention is antifa and other bad actors were on the capitol grounds well before the Trump ralliers arrived preparing the ground for an attack on the capitol.

    And if R&R's heroes on Liz and Nancy's Kangaroo court even considered that I've yet to hear it.

    Ok, maybe a little bit.

    Something like "Mr. Epps are you a bad guy?"

    Epps: "Who me? Hell no. I'm sweetness and light."

    "Fine. You can go now."

    • Like 1
  11. Is anybody up on this ESG thing? If so explain it to me.

    Near as I can figure it stands for an Environmental, Social and Governance agenda amongst the big investment companies. Currently 30% of such companies have bought in. At the present time it seems more voluntary but there's a push to make reporting mandatory. That seems to be the current trend. So who gets the big money for investments will be decided somewhere by somebody or some thing and all seeking investment opportunities will submit to mandatory monitoring. Have too many lights on? Getting sued by a tranny? Not submitting to authority with acceptable vigor? No cash for you. Or at least that's the direction it's going.

    My big question on it is how long before it filters down to the rest of us? How long before the money and other managers of your life such as banks and electric companies are managing your money and activities based on something like your ESG score? Apparently if you ask the question you're a tin foiler requiring pariah status from great tolerant thinkers like herb and Mikey. So what? These sorts of question need to be asked by the open minded. 

    • Like 1
  12. 40 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    Now SHOW US EVIDENCE that Biden KNEW he had classified docs in those boxes and INTENDED TO KEEP THEM.

    He had them for six years. If he didn't know they were there, he's had Alzheimer's even longer than we thought. And if that's the case, for god's sake clean your house, Jill. Get Hunter to clean the garage. He was in and out of there more than anybody even knows. No doubt collecting info so he can collect his '10% for the big guy.'

  13. 29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    Trump was CAUGHT HOARDING 300+ classified documents. All accounts report that Biden had ~25, most in boxes packed by HIS STAFFERS.

    No. You're incorrect. At Biden's home they're reported as "items" not documents. Could be boxes of documents.


  14. 1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

    So you think EVs are going to be limited to 5km range and that no one will be allowed outside their area?   

    I don't remember saying that. Most likely because I didn't.

    Take something like Newsom down in California saying he's going to make gas driven vehicles illegal by 2030 or whenever it is.

    The problem with that is it isn't feasible. The grid wouldn't handle it. The money necessary to make it feasible isn't there and never will be. And it's not just in California they're talking about banning gas driven vehicles.

    So if there's a push to do this but it can't actually be done what do they really want? Cars they will have enough of a grid to keep in the city while the road trip class is out enjoying the highways as they spin past the plebs they've kept to alive to service the roads.

  15. This all sounds very '2030 Agenda-ish' to me.

    The bit they left out is how the Global Resetter investment class like Black Rock and Vanguard have been buying up the suburbs while Gates and others by up farm and ranch land.

    My personal suspicion is this is what the push to go electric with cars is about. Electric and driverless - that's what cars in the 15 minute cities will look like. While Gates and his buddies zip about the vacant countryside, choking down porter house steaks, cuddling city girls all too willing to do anything to get out. They all joke about how they've got the plebs in the cities eating bugs.

    There's the conspiracy theory for you in its complete form. And I don't care who doesn't like it. Every day it gets a little more real. Drip, drip, drip.

    • Haha 2
  16. On 1/24/2023 at 3:11 PM, robosmith said:LMAO


    Here's another interesting little factoid the left doesn't seem to want people to notice.


    During its thirteen-hour search, the DOJ found “six items” containing classified documents at Biden’s home. This does not mean that they found six classified documents, as some reporters have claimed. We do not know exactly how many documents were recovered — which a White House aide confirmed during an interview — because we do not know what the “six items” are. They could be cardboard boxes, plastic tote containers, filing cabinets, woven baskets, any other receptacle capable of holding papers. Any accounting of who had more documents between Trump or Biden is unknowable at this point — and shouldn’t factor into any analysis of the severity of each respective case."

  • Create New...