Tdot

I missed the gist of the argument here. I was unable to comprehend how these events listed here, can be correlated to each other in a meaningful way so I failed at drawing any conclusions relative to the topic. For example, since it is not illegal/not a crime to hold the Canadian flag upside down, I was not able to think of a reasonable and fair way for me to correlate their act to them being immigrants or natural born Canadians. Also that picture did not give me any facts about those humans' national origin, so I failed at being able to deem them natural-born Canadians when I made my own analysis. Most of all, being a citizen born in a country should never mean that we humans can prejudge those citizens for exercising liberties or Rights that citizens are exactly entitled to. The flag for example, is just an item, in the eyes of some citizens born in Canada ---as the flag does not define them OR they feel that the flag no longer defines what the national Constitution declares. No matter the case, it still is never exclusive to one citizen's own private value system nor their preferred national symbolisms ---so I am unable to place judgement on citizens (nor any immigrant) for how they treat their own personal Canadian flag which they purchased for $7.99 at our local thrift store in Tdot near Bloor St and Yonge.

Now this, is beautiful.

Exactly. Which then makes it untrue where you said "Muslims don't have 'relationships' outside marriage" is the point I was making.

trolling in here?

You watched the vid here?

No, they don't. But they do show that they are young Muslims 1)of the the opposite gender who are 2)socializing with each other including 1-on-1 exchanges, which have resulted into specific young Muslims later involved in chaperoned courtships. That all happens long before marriage, meaning they have private intimate-like relationships prior to marriage. And you're correct that you never said socializing at events. I am the one who said that. Yes. I said it in using an example of real life ways showing its untrue that "Muslims don't have 'relationships' outside marriage" since I'm talking about the behavior of young, single Muslims in those cities I mentioned.

Your analysis of the event is not based in, logic, because you left out the vital factors needed to be able to gauge Racism. There are many you left out, but I'll just list the most glaring/most obvious one you excluded; what happens to White very pregnant women when confronted by security on a Swedish subway car, for not having a ticket? You forgot that important element in order for you to play the Racism card here. If pregnant White women are also issued a fine, and then also get violent in anger plus have to be forcefully-removed including taken to a hospital ---then no, it is not racist what happened to the African woman in your OP. But... If the very pregnant White women get confronted by security on Swedish subway cars for not having a ticket and get treated with dignity plus respect, about their crime? Including allowed a OTC ride that day?? Yes indeed just like the civilized, I repeat, civilized polite society expects to treat any perplexed pregnant woman? Then in that case it can be fairly deemed, as racist, for Whites to subject only the African pregnant woman to mistreatment you laid out in the OP. Moreover, it is exactly a subconscious Admission by you, that the society is racist ---if you read that story, then automatically concluded that this could not possibly be a Caucasian Swedish woman being treated that way.

Can you stop with your support for the MSM propaganda? You've been invalidated on every angle of Fake News you have tried so far.

This is not true, at all, here in the USA when it concerns negros (for example) in the Nation Of Islam. In places like Harlem NYC or Chicago or Detroit or Houston or Compton CA you can always see groups of young people socializing during events, mixed gender, and that's likely because getting acquainted with a potential mate has to start somewhere long before marriage.

Yes, and it was abbbbout nine months before you were born ROFL we were behind your grandparent's old barn.

This seems extremely troubling. As in, you might need some Professional/Medical assistance, for something this colossal haunting your life. You truly might have some deep-seated issues with living in a, free Democracy society, and perhaps someone here was correct earlier that you could consider leaving the West and return to a Jihadist region if that's where you came from.

Cool! ..... President Trump refuses to change his mind, about blocking Dr. Fauci from testifying for Schiff/Pelosi in their impeachment hoax 2.0

whoa. I find that to be very, unfortunate, as you agreed last week with Dems then? When they "eliminated" Michigan's Karen Whitsett, for thanking President Trump. Sure did. She can no longer run for office as a, Dem, is what they officially decided to do in eliminating her for doing something that they find not good.

Actually you and @QuebecOverCanada and @Michael Hardner and @New World Disorder all can stand a lesson in USA, politics, considering there are four (4) parties [Repubs, Independents, Greens, and Dems] by which it should only be three if the Dems are deservedly banned. Get properly informed about the USA, fellas The fact that you all are okay with the effort to continually impeach a President because you dislike him for how he LEGALLY & LAWFULLY does his job is the true sign of you yourself being a Totalitarian here.

I agree. Especially when people do it, in an online forum/message board. Like people do here, on this website.

So you calling me a troll here is a, compliment, as I will continue to speak truth to your Dem Deceit Doctrine. Thereby you and (a few others here lately) with your little hurt feefees?---because you all can't handle the truth?? I have no remorse. I didn't join this forum to make, friends, only to respect cordial bloggers here and to speak the truth so..... Cheers!

You are a Dem.

I think this analysis might not have accounted for elements of lust/intimacy which should not be excluded IMHO for example, how it is all about eye-candy to brainwashed male minds for the most part. Yes and that's thanks to the ultimate brainwasher; USA Television. It is the single-most, influential, mechanism affecting the human psyche. Therefore that same young, hot, perky, 19/20yr-old bombshell shown to tv audiences since 1925 has in fact brainwashed most all men into viewing that as the perfect age for women. Which means it is likely not men's "instincts" nor a desire to mate with women of child-bearing age. That child-bearing age range, is 18-47 for most women, so that child-bearing years range is too broad IMHO to be reasonable for considering. Including the fact that today, adults are decreasing their desires and efforts to procreate. Billions of people complain now, that they'd hate to bring a child into the increased-evils our world has normalized since 2007-'09.

Yes. The party of USA, hatred, has started up their nonsense on Capitol Hill just like we all knew they would. This is that final proof, that the Dem party needs to banned from the USA:

It figures. Then too, you're the same person who has no problem with your evil Dem party punishing a Black Dem politician for seeking bipartisanship in our nation's COVID 19 fight. Therefore it makes total sense here, that you would do something asinine, like group all of Islam in the same category ---instead of fairly/veraciously distinguishing the Jihadist (barbaric, brutal and backward) mentality from that mentality of peaceful, loving Islamists such as Obama or Ilhan Omar or Elijah Cummings or @Marocc ... Your colossal unfairness here, was inspired by the Dems you support.

Pure speculation via Dem's propaganda, whenever they refuse to list sources.

Nothing is more, pressing, than extinguishing a potential movement of homegrown terrorists who are angry at the Canadian GOVT's political horizon.

Exactly! So now, Trudeau has to make sure all Canadians can eventually say this same exact thing.