Marocc

Is this a joke? “Evangelicals, Christians of every denomination and believers of every faith, have never had a greater champion in the White House — not even close — than you have right now,” Trump said at a campaign event launching his “Evangelicals for Trump” coalition Friday evening. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/476730-trump-rallies-evangelical-supporters-we-have-god-on-our-side

By that logic Trump is no better. Nor were the former presidents.

US committed grotesque war crimes.

The same concepts do not apply to both men and animals, but do go on defending your indifference. Was? It did. It lost a war. But I'm sure all those people who died in and out of Russia would find your rethoric just fascinating. Almost as if their deaths and tortures had been.....trivial, to you. They changed the name of the country, they didn't cease to exist.

Trump is bluffing.

I don't need to know. I don't measure people based on what they have done in the past.

Your tone is light. Insultingly light. If you cared you wouldn't talk like that. You don't care because it is far away and doesn't directly damage you. It's not about whether you want them killed or not, but whether you care who dies and who doesn't and whether you care about — or even understand — the situation as a whole.

Animals aren't cruel. They don't have a mind like man does. They don't kill out if hatred, they kill to survive. The animals and their communities are built brilliantly. The entire system holds itself up by itself.

It doesn't have any winners. And because it is serious. You might as well stop joking about the destruction that your country causes, even if indirectly. Every single person looking and saying nothing, is guilty. you talk about it the way you do, not because it is what it is, but because you don't care.

You think it's sane? What could they expect behaving the way they did? You go to someone else's land, you show respect.

A bystander making excuses as to why he cannot, why he should not — would not — do anything about the atrocities happening in front of him. You should see his face when the atrocities happen in his city. Suddenly all those old expressions sound rather lame and he's acting like the world owes him something because they didn't do or say anything when his children were slaughtered, his wife sold as a sex slave, his right arm cut off and his property burnt to the ground — as if! C'est la vie!

It's not a game.

Where did it do that? You can't take God out of the societies. You can want to, but you can't do it. a religious person can cite you their holy text to show they are doing right and an atheist can cite you scientific tests and history to show they are doing right. But to find out whether they're doing right or not, you have to first hear what is it they are doing. Study the Constitution. When you have found the faults in it, make a report and send it to someone important, or publish it in the paper. You haven't found a fault. You have found what you suspect automatically should lead to problems.

Employment incentives? Is that the same as employee incentive? Like bonuses? Verbal encouragement? Gifts? If any such incentive makes some privileged compared to others it is the fault of the employer. And no, the white male is not always at the end of the list of priorities.

If it's religious freedom and the safety of women and children you're worried about, The report shows predominantly Muslim women and girls are being targeted with verbal abuse, profanities, physical intimidation and death threats in public places, most often while shopping, and most often by Anglo-Celtic male perpetrators. https://news.csu.edu.au/latest-news/islamophobia-continues-in-australia-2019-report You should give that freedom to other people and guarantee, as far as you can, the safety of other people's women and children. Clearly you are wrong.

To you? Your review of Israel makes as much sense to me, as it would make to you for me to say, "the Nazis only killed the Jews as a last resort, in self defense." Sure, but I value my time and try not to spend it in considering nonsense. No. Do you really think they are or are you just pretending? Makes me feel like you think I'm stupid enough to believe such weak lies. Which then again makes me feel you haven't thought this through.

I didn't. All three Abrahamic religions have the same ten commandments. All three have other laws as well. But no average 'self-respecting' Christian can admit there is more to being a Christian than feigning to obey the ten commandments. No, but because the books have not been preserved. Because there are no details as to who wrote which book of the Bible. Because there are fabrications, contradictions and blasphemy in the Bible itself.

No, it doesn't. History from way before Islam shows that. And if you're going to argue it does, you're gonna have to present something other than just your word for it. Where this from? Religionofpeace?

A bit of an exaggeration, but okay. Good luck creating the first Orwell land.

How do you reconcile the multitude of differences in the writings of the apostles? That doesn't include excecution by the leaders, obviously. The ten commandments were given to Moses. Moses ordered stonings to death in the old testament. The word used in the commandment which is sometimes translated as kill, is better translated as murder, and that's how it is used dozens of times in the old testament. No. The punishment, if it is stoning, can be stoning to death.

There is the law given to moses and to Jesus. Some people try hard to pretend neither of them said anything about how to live. Christianity became corrupted from the start. That's not reformation. It would be strange if someone as bigoted as you didn't have any issue with catholics of today. He said, 'i hate almost everything religion stands for' It is the idea to fear God. But it is strange you find it frightening to imagine living somewhere where it is forbidden to kill, steal, slander, run a corrupt business, harm animals or nature, gossip, walk outside half naked, drink alcohol or disrespect the elderly. I realise you would have to try to follow similar guidelines and for someone from a Western society it isn't easy, but the good thing is, none of those things can be done to you.

Source?

Can you give an example of this?

What promise, exactly? UK has a pretty impressive psychiatric treatment system. Scandinavian countries and Baltic countries have also made great progress with deinstitutionalization in the last decades. Shortage of beds is probably a problem everywhere. In psychiatric treatment it may be part of the deinstitutionalization precisely. The amount of beds are decreased since the amount of admissions decreases. There remains the decision of who gets the available bed. That's for the psychiatrist to make. If there is a big problem with a shortage of beds in one hospital or one ward, it doesn't automatically mean it is the same in other hospitals and other wards.

It would be impractical to make lying a crime, except in court. The common people rarely know whether the person has tried to do what he promised or not.