Marocc

Sharia law

Based on what? Controlling your own diet is an entirely different matter from controlling another's. Since parents love their children, the most logical reason they would not take care of their child's diet is lack of education and not lack of will.

Though, we don't know for sure how many percent it is..

Calling other people names is bullying.

I'm not surprised you can't differentiate between the language of a bully and the correct manner of speaking.

Where does it offer that choice?

Wouldnt it be unethical of you to wear a mask? Who knows what kind of terrorists could be hiding behind those?

The actual fatality rate cannot be known when we a) do not know how many people have or have had the virus and b) when there are unresolved cases.

We don't know the actual fatality rate.

Is he the only bully there?

There's no effective method of screening.

In other words, you don't know? I quoted you an article implying scientists do not know where viruses come from, but you can't say it. If you don't know how they were created, you aren't in a position to say how they were not created without some proof to back it up.

It isn't my work. It is a simple expectation, but not a requirement, that if one wishes to refer to something old about which not everyone knows about, they should make a detailed reference. It is problematic to carry on conversation with people who frequently expect others to read their minds or to be at all times equally informed.

You simply can't know that.

I'll start by saying I am doubtful of much of the information you have shared and notice that you have provided zero evidence to prove them correct. Yes, just because someone looks Chinese or, better yet, Asian, doesn't mean they have the flu you are worried about. Why not? For one to avoid them is mostly illogical unless one happens to know the chef recently returned from China. Chances are, the people working in a Chinese restaurant in Canada have not been to China recently. It does. Exactly so. Many professionals go so far as to say they are useless. Why would you want to wear something that the doctor tells you will not protect you? I'm sure majority of Canadians will be much safer from the virus by follow basic hygienic recommendations — at the moment they do not. That's a bad idea. That's why no one is doing it. better leave these things to the professionals.

I'd prefer you quote them if you want to refer to them. I'm not as interested in the personal opinions of terrorists as you appear to be.

So who did create the viruses if animals "created" the viruses without creating the viruses — do you think they came to be all by themselves without a cause? It would be against science since science holds that nothing happens without a cause. Or do you simply think that you have no idea where viruses came from — other than that animals "created" them without creating them?

It is widely recognized that Americans are generally not practicing Christians. We're going back in time, are we? The truth is, the Uighurs don't care about your conspiracy fantasies.

I quoted the relevant part. There is no excuse for not reading or acknowledging it while still continuing with the same topic. You just love to go at the animals. So then you admit that your claim that animals create the viruses is false? Bats too do not create the viruses. They just mind their own business, but people invade their space and apparently eat things like wolf pups.

Did you notice the article I quoted about viruses? That was my proof against your claim that animals create viruses. If it's this difficult to acknowledge, maybe consider shedding some of that pride.

Unless it's one that guards your personal interests? Like, say, a group of islamophobics trying to convince gullible Muslims that dressing modestly is overrated, abstaining from alcohol is boring and having casual sex is as innocent as buying oranges. Or irreligious beliefs.

Yes, there is. This is an opportune moment to defend your claim that animals create viruses, admit you don't know what you're talking about or give up and say nothing if it suits you best.

They are created by Allah like everything else. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/158179.php They are microscopic organisms that exist almost all over the earth. They can infect animals, plants, fungi, and bacteria. "After contacting a host cell, a virus will insert genetic material into the host and take over that host's functions. Three competing theories try to explain the origin of viruses. Regressive, or reduction hypothesis: Viruses started as independent organisms that became parasites. Over time, they shed genes that did not help them parasitize, and they became entirely dependent on the cells they inhabit. Progressive, or escape hypothesis: Viruses evolved from sections of DNA or RNA that "escaped" from the genes of larger organisms. In this way, they gained the ability to become independent and move between cells. Virus-first hypothesis: Viruses evolved from complex molecules of nucleic acid and proteins either before or at the same time as the first cells appeared on Earth, billions of years ago."

Animals don't create viruses. It's pretty obvious. In other words your side stepping the fact that according to your logic the new virus came into existence by itself. You're two-faced. Anyway, can you be that where it fits the topic?

The King Solomon — the prophet? The religious judge? In sharia Court? Are we still in the same topic? A non-Muslim need not go to an Islamic judge. In UK it is against the law to force someone to do that. Hence Muslims and the Islamic judge can force no one in UK to do anything. The idea of the Islamic court is to serve Muslims who believe in Islam and have those "religious beliefs". This happens all the time. If that's your main interest, I bet you're the first person you should be worried about.