Jump to content

Yzermandius19

Suspended
  • Posts

    8,443
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Everything posted by Yzermandius19

  1. that's not a show that is broadcasting a sport you like and pretending it's a show the CBC had nothing to do with that being quality content whatsoever that was all about the hockey being played it's not like private broadcasters can't air hockey games they can and they do the CBC does nothing useful
  2. no it hasn't The CBC wouldn't know what a good show was if a good show slapped the CBC in the face the CBC doesn't even have one show in the top 100 of all time they've never produced anything great they occasionally produce some shows that don't completely suck but they are massive outlier
  3. you sound like a communist private broadcasters do a much better job it's an absolute blow out in favor of the free market over the crown in terms of services delivered their content is so much better the CBC is garbage the only thing it's good at is propaganda and propping up shitty content via affirmative action
  4. if they are good enough shows to watch, some other broadcaster can pick them up don't need the CBC for quality content, the CBC is there to prop up shitty content private broadcasters do broadcasting better, by several orders of magnitude
  5. fck them and the horse they rode in on government run broadcasting is for communists nothing but propaganda and shitty programming I don't care if Canadians enjoy it they are stupid sheeple who like dumb shit
  6. yeah and the BBC is stupid too copying dumb ideas doesn't make them any smarter
  7. would be worth it in the long run the CBC is costing the CPC more votes than it can afford and it does so every election cycle
  8. created by the Liberals in 1936 that's a William Lyon Mackenzie King joint
  9. did you know people with no sense of humor think that those who don't find their jokes funny just have no sense humor? can't possibly be that the joke wasn't good, lulz
  10. barren hellscape? your Bernier Derangement Syndrome is really something else wtf are you talking about?
  11. I acknowledged you think they should protest elsewhere whether or not you like the location of the protest is not a good reason to restrict speech you are not arbiter of who should protest where, nor should you be, that is not your call to make especially when the basis of your call is so petty and frivolous and your priorities make no sense
  12. we are not debating whether it is or isn't legal you have yet to make a case why it is right other than it's legal and it's popular, or they can just protest somewhere else which are dumb reasons to restrict rights, particularly speech if that all you got, then you don't have a good case and you should not expect people to respect such a poorly thought through opinion as justification to infringe on their rights
  13. that was a bad precedent a bad precedent hardly justifies setting another bad precedent
  14. the lefties are fans of the cuckservative since he's just another liberal quelle surprise this is just further proof that Canada's "center" is quite far to the left and the Overton window of acceptable political opinion in Canada is extremely narrow
  15. your assumption that only ignorance could lead to my conclusions is not reality though you are correct about most Canadians knowledge level being very low the research I have done is quite enlightening it simply leads me to different conclusions than your own
  16. your losing patience is a stupid reason to restrict rights the majority thinking it's a good idea is also a stupid reason to restrict rights you not liking who is being cracked down on doesn't make the crackdown okay
  17. the law against preventing access to hospitals covers the only utility that banning protests outside of hospitals would provide so you literally don't have any reason to support such a law, other than just wanting to crackdown on opinions you don't like because they protest at a location you wish they didn't protest at nowhere near a good enough justification to restrict speech
  18. the RCMP can handle the domestic policing, the coast guard can handle guarding the coasts and the shipping traffic, America can police the airspace Canada does not need a military, just an armed constabulary it can go Giant Iceland, it has no major threats to it's sovereignty and even if it did, Canadians are not willing to pay enough to properly defend itself from them the military adds nothing worth doing that can't be done by some other government agency Canada has no need to get involved in any of the wars it has gotten into lately, so getting rid of the military will prevent them from continuing to do that who does Canada need to be kept safe from, that our military actually keeps us safe from? riddle me that also fck enforcing stupid drug laws
  19. in order to enforce a law against protests outside of hospitals, a protest has to form outside of hospitals, which could obstruct access to hospitals it makes no sense, people can break the new law just like they broke the old law, you prevented nothing all you did was restrict speech with zero benefit whatsoever, good job
  20. I didn't vote for Trudeau at any point but at least he legalized weed which makes a vote for him in 2015, a reasonable decision
  21. there are laws against the obstruction already so how does banning the protests prevent that anymore than the current laws already do? you are proposing a new law that is redundant while restricting free speech to accomplish a goal that has already been accomplished that doesn't make any sense
  22. you are capable of determining the objective truth for yourself you seem to be under the impression that we should all be made to agree if God wanted us all to agree we would all agree God would rather we have free will and use our consciousness to determine that for ourselves
  23. I've already answered that question
×
×
  • Create New...