Dougie93

America is protecting the entire world from the onset of totalitarian collectivist authoritarian despotic regime retrenchment, particularly the Western World.

It is actually America which has your back, because they are driving a wedge between your government and China, in order to contain China, which is good for them, but since they are the ones defending you and propping your nanny socialist corporate welfare fake jobs economy up, good for you by extension.

So DIA has just released a report justifying the American withdraw from INF 87'. It's actually 'China has become the world leader in INF's" and not actually "Ivan did it first!" after all.

Prohibition did however serve a purpose, which was to turn America from a nation of drunkards, to a nation of limited government libertarians who just happened to also be drunk.

Prohibition in America was like America's version of Canadian Confederation, in that it fundamentally corrupted the entire governance of the nation in order to prop it up, and so eventually it had to be overthrown by market force.

Well it simply got to the solution faster than the Americans, which was a Nanny Temperance Lady LCBO which is now nothing more than a life support system for a public sector union.

And Canada did have prohibition, you are as usual simply ill informed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_Canada

But breed bans are not the issue, The issue is rather despite your charter right to it, the Liberals will have you charged if you attempt to defend your life limb or property with force. That's unconstitutional and subject to juries with often overthrow it, none the less you shouldn't have to be charged at all, and even if, they shouldn't be able to invoke Section 33 when and if you win the case.

Nor submachine guns. Nor machine pistols. Handguns I am open to under restrictions.

In terms of machine guns, I did not advocate for gun control laws allowing for non military usage of belt fed sustained fire automatic weapons crew served nor otherwise.

An internet forum is simply an online self publishing service wherein you adhere to the terms and conditions in order to publish your thoughts ideas to the world wide web, what you choose to write in terms of content is entirely up to you and not subject to anyone, other than in right of the moderator.

Mind you I also voted Stephen Harper, in the hopes that he might loosen some of the more Kafkaesque draconian gun control laws. Gave him nine years to do it, he didn't do it. So I used Gerry Butt's Sockpuppet Zoolander as a mechanism to fire Harper. I'm not above strategic voting at all, with no partisan loyalty neither, and you can still make incremental progress for your tethered tax jurisdiction, in that if you can't get the Canadian nanny prohibitionist state to lighten up on gun control, then you might as well see if you can get the Canadian nanny socialist welfare state to lighten up on prohibition.

The only way to cease and desist this inherent corruption is to either; a) let Quebec go. b) kick them out by you going first By peaceful transfer of power democratic means self determination under the Clarity Act.

And the Kneedippers are simply the purity spiraling wing of the virtue signalling media party, and thus, all roads lead to Rome, Rome being the Liberal Party of Canada's dysfunctional generational legacy project which is now reduced to Ontario corrupting all aspects of government, in the name of bribing Quebec with Alberta's money. Plus a very very good hockey team.

The Tories are a prop, they are simply the Washington Generals to the Liberal Harlem Globetrotters. The Tories play the role of the team which is paid to lose, otherwise known as the Patsy. Also employed in boxing, when the mafia pays a boxer to take a dive.

To wit, all you have left now, is a very very good hockey team, and Ontario corrupting all governance in the name of bribing Quebec with Alberta's money. The rest is just balderdash Eskimo Communism fed to the masses as mothers milk from birth, so they won't notice the failed state of affairs.

Bear in mind, the double standard is baked into the cake of the failed state Confederation of Ontario bribing Quebec with Alberta's money, which is part and parcel to a Liberal Party of Canada generation legacy project since about Laurier.

It's not my Duck Test, it was born of an American poet named James Whitcomb Riley

In the end Trudeau serves the same purpose as Trump does, which is to wreck the government, so if you support Trump you should be supporting Trudeau, they are simply the same weapon delivered with the same effects from opposite wings of the political spectrum. targeted at the center.

The Duck Test doesn't say that you are, more that you presented as one in your flowering praise of the associated CBC state propaganda arm.

Bear in mind, I am not impugning anyone for being a Trudeau supporter, because de facto I supported Trudeau when I voted Liberal in my riding. So I say it as a Trudeau supporter, loud and proud; populist blast penetration creative destruction device plus dope delivered to your door convenience.

The Duck Test is of course a fallacy, but a fallacy simply means unproven, doesn't mean it's not true. /shrugs

Abductive reasoning, Duck Test; looks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck, is probably a duck by logical abduction.

But, again, just make sure you've divested yourselves of the nanny states before you go to incite their downfall.

As the United States military serves in defence of the constitution uber alles, unlike a royalist army which is mercenary, I am confident they will remain at their posts for the most part.