Dougie93

I'm simply not interested in being praised for any virtuous acts I may have undertaken, thus I don't list them when I am publishing to the internet.

Government control at the threshold of making Big Brother himself blush, they published to the internet. lolwhut? Cuckoo. Cuckoo.

It's nicer out here in Wellington County anyways, it's not Glenn Gould's Toronto anymore, or at least, the last vestiges of that are going away now, the Megacity is consuming the old City of Toronto.

Particularly when the supposed virtue is the One World Government Socialist Revolution, so long ago cast upon the ash heap of history by its own pilfering mass murdering hand.

Circular reasoning, it is because you say it is. Logic declaims "in-camera" as unfounded meaningless blather, trusting politicians is a separate issue, which I addressed in good faith.

I didn't grant permission nor deny permission, you published the phrase/word "in-camera" to the internet, I had already disregarded it as nonsense and moved on to your next assertion, you asked for a clarification, I gave you one.

I'm not asking your permission to do anything. "In camera" is apparently some sort of made up nonsense word, but whatever, just sayun.

Facta non verba. If we wish to be virtuous, we take virtuous actions, we don't need to be praised for it, thus there's no need to signal.

I don't recall posting any appeals to you, you posted some nonsensical blather by definition, I pointed it out, you posting blather and then insisting it be recognized as cogent is special pleading.

It's not in the dictionary, thus it is blather, you can go f**k yourself for all I care. /shrugs

No. Everything I asserted is in the dictionary. "In-camera" is not. Thus you and eyeball are spewing meaningless blather, while I am making a cogent point about how representative democracy works, in the Queen's English.

You have the public macroscope, it's called a free press, enjoy.

I was quoting what you published to the internet, "in camera" is meaningless blather, thus I assumed that as being moot.

But I take what I want by force. I simply begin that process at market force. No reason to escalate beyond that threshold at this juncture, as Elizabeth Windsor is not imperiled at this juncture in my estimation.

How so? I voted for Justin Trudeau and I got exactly what I voted for. I voted for Doug Ford and got exactly what I voted for.

There's something wrong with your comprehension, Canada is not a people's republic and never will be.

There is no res publica in Canada. The public has no rights but what's in the Charter, public rule is not in there.

This is not a formal democracy, it is a Constitutional Monarchy, you're not actually entitled to prevent government secrecy, all you are entitled to do, is vote for a representative. If you don't like the results, you can vote for someone else. That's all you are entitled to, you won't get "in camera blah, blah, blah" from the judiciary.

Lobbying is a completely necessary and perfectly reasoned component of representative democracy and in fact constitutionally protected speech. It is not only folly to expect negotiations to be conducted in public, it's actually essential not to do so, otherwise you couldn't get anything done ever, in the face of ceaseless partisan rabble rousing. Which is legislating from the streets, which is not compatible with representative democracy nor the British Crown which upholds it. GSTQ-TMLF /PSA

It's quite easy to see who is lobbying the government, I don't need a camera to see Jerry Diaz and Unifor trying to pull the strings of Butts and Telford. And their sockpuppet Zoolander. But who cares? The Information Age is sweeping Unifor into oblivion, the Dingbats can't save them, so big whoop.

Indeed, there's plenty enough governance, we are large and in charge, the kings of the world living like the Kings of Virginia, the Chicoms can pound sand, I'm not flying to them, because they have no quality. Mind you, arbitrage plays are still in effect, if you want to own Tencent you can buy Naspers because they are holding $175 billion of Tencents $561 billion, but they hold it from Joburg not Beijing.

That's what we do, locally we are the House of Windsor, globally we are free subjects of, interacting with the free markets, doing unto others; by national and international law and the laws of armed conflict as a founding and permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. You can put your big boy pants on and join us any time.

The House of Stuart is perpetuated by union with the House of Hanover, Elizabeth Stuart > Sophia of Hanover > George I George I George II George III George IV William IV Victoria I (Mother Canada) Edward VII George V (The People's King) Edward VIII (Abdicates) George VI (Bertie) Elizabeth II (The Boss) FTW. Suck it, lefties.

Jake Muzzin time, t-minus 2 hours 28 minutes. Get hype.

I don't make war on behalf of communist countries, I only make war in defence of Elizabeth Windsor in defence of the right. Communist countries would probably have you shot. You enjoy the protection of Elizabeth Windsor so long as you do not threaten her with being unhorsed and unheaded. If you cross that threshold, again, you are liable for what you publish.