hot enough

Let's see how long it takes the "scientist", to locate that. Why were carbon nanotubes found in WTC firemen, first responders, workers, ... ? Case Report: Lung Disease in World Trade Center Responders 
Exposed to Dust and Smoke: Carbon Nanotubes Found in the Lungs 
of World Trade Center Patients and Dust Samples Maoxin Wu1, Ronald E. Gordon1, Robin Herbert2, Maria Padilla3, Jacqueline Moline2, David Mendelson4, Virginia Litle5*, William D. Travis6, Joan Gil1 1Department of Pathology, 2Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, 3Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, 4Department of Radiology, and 5Department of Thoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; 6Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

On the contrary. You keep illustrating that you are unable or highly reluctant [Why?] to do the simple research needed to find out the results of the study done by Professor Leroy Hulsey. Why are you so set on protecting the liars? How long will you continue this deception?

In all that, Betsy, there is no discussion of the science, by Betsy. Big type doesn't mean science.

Wilber, the two year scientific study of NIST's WTC7 "study" came to the conclusion, because it studied all the science, that NIST's report had a zero chance of being correct. NIST denied explosions and yet you see with your own eyes a human being, one of the roughly 3,000 murdered that day, being explosively ejected from one of the twin towers, by a strong explosion, at high speed. And still you fantasize that the world renown liars are telling you the truth. How did the alleged hijackers melt the metals that had 1000F and up melting points above what jet fuel/office furnishings can provide? How did the alleged hijackers manage to get their hands on nanothermite, a US non-commercially available, recently developed at Lawrence Livermore Labs, high grade military explosive?

Let's you and I, or anyone, Betsy, discuss the science. Show us that you understand what PM is really saying. PM's last offering is 2011. The study of science doesn't end, it always keeps on going. Remember, the chance of NIST's report on WTC7 being correct is zero. You can't go lower than zero. Tell me why, Betsy, NIST was able to do a "study", and come up with a "zero chance of being correct" report for WTC7 but it stopped at collapse initiation for WTCs 1 and 2?

Not surprising, NYT is propaganda central.

How does it compare to all the US right wing dictatorship countries?

Isn't that the paper where Matthew"Oh my god, there's a commie in my underwear"Fisher works?

Really, Wilber? Didn't it bother you even a wee bit to see the HUMAN BEING, one of yours, being blasted out the window of one of the twin towers by a huge explosion. Remember, NIST denied that there were any explosions. And you probably still trust these "scientists" who lied their asses off. All you people are defending those who have falsely accused the alleged hijackers. These same people illegally invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, all based on lies, which, as we all know, is par for the course. Gulf of Tonkin, Nicaragua, Korea, Cambodia [no lies there, except for keeping it a compete secret], Laos, Indonesia, East Timor, Chagos Islands, the Maine, ... . A collection of holocausts.

Not OftenWrong.

Have you ever heard the justifications for the Holocaust?

It's all old material, Betsy. See the human being being forcefully ejected at high speed from one of the twin towers. NIST, who lied about most everything, including saying, in spite of the voluminous evidence, that there were no explosions, can't explain away the explosively ejected human being. It's amazing how people can support an evil this deep.

Typical for an ignorant person like Trump.

The gall; the sanity spectrum. A twin tower explosion, of which, there were none according to the grand fabricators, blows a human being out the window and you talk about sanity.

Hulsey not Halsey, corroborate, not cooperate. If you were live you would be oozing onto the floor. You watched a human being being exploded out a twin tower window and here you are making excuses for yourself and advancing your lies about the grad students. You didn't watch any Hulsey video.

No arguments, nothing in the world can help a guy who states that he is sticking to his "default".

It shouldn't have taken you this long. But you can't state what this "very little" is because you haven't been able to face it.

NIST denied explosions despite myriad people, some 180 [??] firefighters reporting them. Now we have a human being being blown out a twin tower window by an explosion and you don't miss a beat defending the ones who did this. What if that was your brother, or dad or uncle or ... ?

You haven't watched the video nor have you heard what Professor Hulsey has described. What has he stated?

That is laughable. A real study has been done and I know that you haven't searched out the video to watch Professor Hulsey describe how NIST lied because you don't want to face it and you wouldn't understand it. Why did NIST change their story about free fall? How about that body being shot out the window of one of the twin towers? Does that thrill you no end?

Completely false. Why are you trusting the very people who lied about it in the first place, NIST? You are always way short on what actually happened. Did you see the human being blown out of the tower window by an explosion? Are you happy to be defending folks who blew up 3,000 people in the twin towers?

Go to 4:35 of the following video, it'll only take a few seconds and watch until 4:48 and you will see a person get blown out of the window of one of the twin towers by an explosion. This is the evil that so many of you are protecting.

Yuck.

What is fantastic about falsely accusing people and then using those lies to whip unthinking individuals into supporting two major illegal invasions and a host of smaller ones?

Forgive me but that doesn't say very nice things about you. You refuse to hear or think about impossible events that are the foundation of this gigantic cover up because your default is to believe something you know is a lie.