hot enough

You just can't seem to find a murderous conservative politician to love. But you state proudly you belong to a murderous party.

You illustrate, constantly, that you are in no position to determine that. What little you posted had nothing to do with science; it never does. You are woefully ignorant of the science issues surrounding 911, as are all your little cohorts. conservatives???

Who are your favorite murderous conservatives? Harper? Mulroney?

How many of your nutty responses can we expect from a guy who constantly whines about people being off topic just to divert attention away from issues you are too frightened to address. conservatives ??

Take it to http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/topic/26612-why-all-the-worldwide-turmoil/ and we can discuss why you are petrified of discussing science.

Another of your famous leaps of logic, Argus. How many more are there? You don't like the murderous conservative Kissinger. How about the murderous conservative Nixon? Reagan? Ford? Bush? Bush? Eisenhower?

You know absolutely nothing about the man, his profession, his study, his religion, his anything. Talk about jumping to crazy conclusions. Who is the loony?

You, as usual, do not know what you are talking about, Argus. Befuddled by a lifetime of conservative brainwashing.

A win-win for America has always consisted of abusing and terrorizing innocents and all the world's countries have had to clean up the effects of their war crimes.

Although all US war crimes and terrorist acts of of great importance, let's just start with the 4 million murdered Muslims since 1990, described by the US Physicians for Social Responsibility. If this doesn't put an end to all the silly suggestions that we poor westerners are living in such dangerous times, threatened as we are by the Muslim hordes, I don't know what will. Red Scare - it's deja vu all over again.

You folks don't read anything. It is right on this page, page 2. And that is a laugh. Most of you folks just continue to make unsubstantiated Red Scare/Muslim comments that are simply repeats of right wing hate websites.

You posted this as a response to my response to drummindiver. Did you not notice how he failed to address any of the sources I had quoted - all he did was make a silly assertion that had no basis in fact.

More claptrap, more historical nonsense. The US is clearly the problem. When you illegally invade more than 70 countries, slaughter tens of millions, steal their wealth, commit genocides, how are you different from Nazi Germany? Four million Muslims murdered since 1990 according to the US Physicians for Social Responsibility. Do you folks ever read anything? Certainly not any of the US installed vicious right wing dictatorships. Those are what is responsible for the large numbers of murdered innocents.

And you have missed the foaming at the mouth hatred being levied at Muslims who have done nothing how?

A typical uniformed response, gleaned from equally uninformed right wing websites. You can tell where you are coming from by your added comment.

Just another of the typical brilliantly academic responses one sees here at MLW.

That's good. That means that he can still be brought to the Hague.

The Physicians for Social Responsibility are fervent in their anti American bigotry? Who knew? Why not try making some sense, dd?

Hitler was a conservative too. Very very conservative, like Paul Ryan, Jesse Helms, Billy Graham the war criminal, Nixon and Kissinger, Reagan the butcher of Nicaragua. Nice company. A typical cowardly conservative meme. Professor Leroy Hulsey isn't on the fringes; he says, categorically, that there is zero chance that the NIST report on WTC7 is true. As a discerning conservative, you would have to understand the implications of that. Is the cognitive dissonance once again roiling your brain?

That is an extremist, and an inaccurate viewpoint. You are definitely an extremist, Argus. Extremists deny reality in favor of their prejudices. I was just wondering about you a short while ago, why you fled from various topics because the cognitive dissonance was overwhelming your brain.

You are right in one respect, he has been placating the USA. But that has been going on for a good long time even as the US has been doing things the equal of the Nazis.

Are Canadian Liberals talking about marginalizing racial minorities, are they encouraging pogroms against "others"? Xenophobia has always been a big team sport in the US, and it has infected Canada too.

If Billy were alive today, would he be tolerant and accepting of Muslims or would he be plumping for their extermination too? What is the Billy Graham organization's views on the illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan? Are they still the war mongers that Billy was?

Well, "my beef" is that it seems rather odd for a Christian to be quoting war criminals and the like as stalwart and upstanding folk, who we ought to look to for moral guidance. What gets quoted next, Mein Kampf? the extended quotes of PolPot, another gentlemen the US and likely, Billy, supported.

You quote a man, an organization, that avidly supported US war crimes in Vietnam. How can this be seen as godlike? A man who advised a plan that would see a million or more murdered. A man who suggested a plan of action that saw a German war criminal sentenced to death. Why would a purported Christian support such deep evil, quote such deep evil, as an expression of god's love? Is this what tolerance and acceptance is all about in your mind?