hot enough

One does not 'tie up one to something, unless it is a post, a wagon, ... . In that status update, I pointed out a top Evangelical Christian minister's [Billy Graham] plumping for a war crime, causing the potential death of a million or so innocent Vietnamese, which is murder, which you denied was part of Evangelical Christianity.

It's clear that you are having/always have a ponderous problem with facts and how they fit together in any sort of comprehensible manner. Is this a common trait among Evangelical Christians?

And shoveling tons of it.

You are full of Evangelical Christianity.

It is not my job to bring you up to speed on every little thing. That source has been posted at least once, so go and find it. Is research also beyond you? Do you know what Google is?

I'm surprised that you bought, and swallowed, that hook, line and sinker. From professors who are too frightened to address even the science of 911 because they fear doing so in the "open, honest, free expression west".

Take it up with the the US based Physicians for Social Responsibility.

How are we to put any faith in a guy who demands we believe only his rants? "hazarding guesses" seems to be all you can do.

Your suggestion, I take it, is to read only those portions of the bible and ignore the rest. Shall I rip out of my bible the parts that command genocide, the herem parts?

Yes, you also know that it is much more than your diversion. The simple fact that you won't address the 4 million murdered Muslims or any of the other issues I raised says a lot - despite mouthing platitudes about how great, how open and honest the west and we westerners are, you hide behind little stories about what you are doing to be a kind, loving person. Do people like this avoid discussing the totally unnecessary deaths of 4 million people? Eisenhower dragged German civilians to the death camps to show them what was done in their name. Is this what it will take?

Nice diversionary screed, bb. Are you equally thankful to live in a country that prevents others from doing this or actively supports countries like the US/UK that butcher people who want the same things?

A dandy example of language leveling.

Do you realize that at least 25% of the 4 million of the murdered are children? You ask, "What do you do for your 9/11 cause?" when you clearly know what I do. And instead of addressing the hard issues in a frank, open and honest western fashion, you have been supporting the most virulent racists with your silence. Why? Isn't your post an excellent example of what far too many honest, kind, war and loving westerners are doing/have been doing as their 911 cause?

All you Christians, all you who seek to save Muslims from their "evil" ways, all you warm, loving, kind, benevolent westerners, I give you - your go to leader.

They are inextricably intertwined. Is your cause to help Muslims/the "ignorant", "backwards" Middle Easteners? How does murdering 4 million of them help anyone, most of all them? How does murdering 4 million on a big lie help anyone. To my way of thinking, it makes us grand hypocrites, AND to be frank, much worse.

And all the kind folks, the Christians, the loving westerners, who seek to help bring the Muslims "out of their ignorance" sit silent.

This is all well and good, Goddess, having rational discussions about helping women around the world, doing good works, being christian, ... . But it doesn't address the 4 million Muslims murdered since 1990. It is, let me suggest, an attempt to put a window dressing/a grand facade on a drug joint or a whore house. I haven't heard you call out any of the racist Islamaphobes that post here, so frequently and so virulently. I haven't heard you say, "Well, you know if a highly respected, top US forensic engineer on building/bridge/steel structures failures says, CATEGORICALLY, that WTC7 did not come down as per the official US government story, perhaps we should give this another look. That's what we open and honest westerners do."

But a very apt description of guess who.

Not even close to as good a propagandist as Senator Joseph McCarthy. Ole smokin' Joe drank himself into an early grave, probably sitting on his porch, with his dog, toying with his propane bar-bee-cue.

More of your terrible propaganda. One would think that they would hire someone who has a grasp of the realities. ... ... I take that back. No one in these groups of racist Islamaphobes has any real grasp of reality.

And a terrible propagandist to boot. "Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?" -Joseph N Welch [castigating the immoral Senator Joe McCarthy]

That's not true at all, and sadly you know this, DoP. It's racism when it is used as you use it; to disparage, to mock, to ridicule, to encourage deep resentment against a specific group. Anyone with a scintilla of common sense should see through your shtick in an instant, for all these things you do are done so poorly and in such an openly and overt racist fashion.

You mean truthers, as in those who believe in the truth, like teachers, those who teach; employers, those who employ people; movers, those who move things; ... . This is a 3rd or 4th grade English lesson. Stupid lessons, I must note, because the kids already know these rules by the time they start school, but that's another topic. Why is this lost on you, an adult? I presume.

Another "case of selective blindness at work here", Angus. I shan't waste my time when it likely be ruled as "off topic". There is another thread that will cover it all, I hope.

Definitely more than one "case of selective blindness at work here", Angus. Canada is backwards in a number of ways, and forward thinking in others. Canada has been committing and denying a genocide for over a century, in keeping with their much more genocidal neighbors southward. Canada has supported, in an up and down fashion, the myriad illegal invasions of sovereign nations by the US. That means Canada has involved itself in war crimes. Absolutely there are things in other countries that could be made better, but Canada and the US are in no position to be lecturing about "our legal provisions governing marriage" when they have just recently crawled out of the dark ages themselves.