hot enough

15 YEARS LATER: ON THE PHYSICS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING COLLAPSES http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf

15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses Steven Jones1, Robert Korol2, Anthony Szamboti3 and Ted Walter4 1 Brigham Young University (early retired) 2 McMaster University (emeritus) 3 Mechanical design engineer in the aerospace industry 4 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Abstract On September 11, 2001, the world witnessed the total collapse of three large steel-framed high-rises. Since then, scientists and engineers have been working to understand why and how these unprecedented structural failures occurred. © European Physical Society, EDP Sciences, 2016 http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/abs/2016/04/epn2016474p21/epn2016474p21.html

The following is strictly VERBOTEN! I cannot comment here upon pain of death.

You don't have to be a scientist to do scientific reasoning. If you were to apply your BS filters, I say 'were' because I understand the pressure everyone is under to avoid the unmentionable 'thing', to the science, they would be flashing red, blowing sirens, causing mini brain explosions, ... .

And this has a connection to science how?

The deafening silence tells it all. How can anyone deny that there isn't this huge, palpable pall, an incredible cloak of silence that envelops all western societies when it comes to discussion of things 911? This a verboten topic. This is not what people should talk about, EVER! Why? If the result of this event had had a different, less emotional side/end to it, this thread would be the hottest topic MLW had ever seen. The science is unbelievably intriguing - what's this new nanothermite?!! How do three buildings fall on the same day from fires, when none have ever fallen from fires before or since? Holy Cow!! What are the odds on that happening? [astronomical, if anyone cares] Consider how huge the discussions would be if Russia or China attempted a fraud of this scale. They would have to build a new UN building to hold all the discussions. But in the countries that are the children of the Enlightenment there is stone cold silence. In the bastion of freedom of speech, the USA, people's tongues have had locks put on them, their brains made afraid. "Governments don't want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking, That is against their interests. They want obedient workers, people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork, and just dumb enough to passively accept it." - George Carlin

With all due respect, Michael, you don't have any idea on these things, and though I do, somewhat, they are not of the science. Why are you even going there when there is so much strong, solid science that illustrates that the hijackers story isn't within the realm of possibility? Please put your considerable mental skills towards addressing some of those science issues. Any single one of them should have people demanding a real investigation.

Far out, capricorn! Groovy.

A drowning woman, clutching at straws. Science isn't owned by America. That's a childish notion.

You bet I do. SCIENCE Used in every circumstance where its use is warranted. People who say they believe in science can't be called believers in science when they take a stand that they can pick and choose when to be "with science". Science is used to prove and disprove so it can be used in every realm, every situation. What do we go to as a society to investigate and prove all things?

Listen to you taking a generic, with nothing at all authoritative other than an Argus, suggesting that "It's rare", again with nothing at all authoritative other than an Argus, and attempting to make it into a commonality. This from a guy who is frightened to death by science.

That's funny, coming from you, eyeball.

The first rapers and pillagers.

Why would you suggest that no one had the means or the motivation? It flies in the face of the facts presented by the science. The science is what is important. How could these unreacted nanothermite particles get into WTC dust? Why would a non-commercially available nanothermite [a new era of explosives] developed in the 1990s by the US military Lawrence Livermore Labs, patented in 1996/97, be at WTC? Why would these red/gray chips viewed under a microscope illustrate an explosive that is not possible except when made with nanotechnology? This is not your average everyday thermite, ie. it is not ground down to nano size particles; that would be impossible. It is made from the atomic level up, using nanotechnology. It had no legitimate/legal reason to be found at WTC. Even your average everyday thermite would have had no legitimate/legal reason to be found at WTC. The chemical signature for these red/gray chips is the same as the chemical signature for normal thermite, with much greater explosive power. Their ignition, at a low temperature [430C/806F] relative to normal thermite illustrates how the nano scale particles allow for much greater explosive power in the reaction. 9/11: WTC Nanothermite chip vs Paint ignition by Mark Basile

Likewise, the video of WTC7 falling at free fall in a classic controlled demolition doesn't lie. Did you hear all the people describe it as an implosions, a controlled demolition?

Did you see WTC7 collapse at free fall speed? Only a controlled demolition can do that. Alleged Arab hijackers could not have organized that. Did you see the molten and vaporized WTC7 steel girders found? Jet fuel and office furnishings cannot do that, therefore alleged Arab hijackers could not have done that. Did you see the non-commercially available nanothermite [a new era of explosives] developed in the 1990s by the US military Lawrence Livermore Labs found in WTC dust? Alleged Arab hijackers had no access to those.

I forgive you, Betsy.

No, that was just some hard truths. Forgive me. You could be more christian if you wanted. Going to a unchristian rule book - "now what's that come back line again about the devil and jesus" just shows that you are another product of a narrow minded book. You could think for yourself if you truly wanted to.

That has been the tall tale told.

Nice try, Mr Sweeping Generalizations. You failed to answer the question.

The only reason the christian thing comes up is because you constantly parade your stunningly unchristian evangelical christianity, Betsy. Why are you like this? Does your bible tell you act in this unchristian manner? Is this the way to salvation, the way to god?

Another whole bunch of generalizations. You make a habit of this, Boges. Why?

Making such statements without knowing the facts is also that kind of "move".

Betsy, the evangelical christian. Would your pastor support you in this? Is this how all evangelical christians act?

It is, when it comes down to small groups. When it is the type of national racism that you see on the grand scale that was seen in the US SE Asian war crimes of the 1950/60/70/80/90s or the virulent racism that has marked any of the myriad US invasions, the ones that you are too scared to address, it is gross racism. It runs rampant thru American history. Today is no different.