hot enough

If that were true, how do you explain your obsession with not discussing the science?

Now the nanothermite.

That's a start, stumbling, but a start. Now the nanothermite.

First we have to know that you even know what you are talking about. Describe how thermite and nanothermite are made.

You need to explain much more, Omni. Your test, answer from your deep knowledge base, no cheating by looking at the books. How is nanothermite created from "heat and MATERIALS"?

There you go again, with those well known Argus facts.

Would your explanation be any weirder than your reply?

As I said, "You are making no sense, Omni. That information is available, if one is knowledgeable, if one has a modicum of research skills." Then I added, "Reasonable scenarios have been described. Why do you folks always come loaded for bear with no ammunition?" That is the most ludicrous idea anyone has advanced in a gigantic panoply of ludicrous notions. And you don't even understand just how ludicrous it is. How, in that huge conflagration did the nanothermite get into a solgel solution? Perhaps you should try to actually understand what nanothermite is. Explain it to us so we know you can further discuss this.

Argus wrote: "The cause of death of the guy involved has not been released to the public." You use as your source a newspaper report and then you say, "I am always, after all, in possession of the facts".

You are making no sense, Omni. That information is available, if one is knowledgeable, if one has a modicum of research skills. Reasonable scenarios have been described. Why do you folks always come loaded for bear with no ammunition? The issue you raised was the thermite. We have established between the two of us that it was there, in a new variety - nanothermite, a product that no Arab "hijacker" had a snowball's chance in hell of ever obtaining. You are avoiding addressing what legitimate reason there is for it being there. A police investigator upon finding a pistol by a body doesn't start immediately wondering how an as yet unknown suspect got the money necessary to buy one. He knows there has been killing and he follows the science to determine what happened. Are you in the habit of often trying to squirt toothpaste onto your toothbrush before you take off the cap? Ignoring the nanothermite and the 1500 times normal residues of thermitic reactions doesn't illustrate that you have a science inclination or a logical inclination.

Are they welcome if they point out that there is no god, that it is a fraud like scientology or any of the other ologies?

Big brick wall, Omni, you hit it when you acknowledged thermite at WTC and you have been backtracking ever since. You haven't explained the presence of those explosives at all. You haven't explained how explosives that could not/should not have been there in a legal sense, were there? You have a contradiction bigger than Everest and you are flummoxed.

There is only one answer to give and it is the answer that is being demanded by racists and racist politicians, like Kellie Leitch. Are there other racist politicians I should be aware of?

I know what you get, melted aluminum, not thermite. There is no legal or legitimate reason for thermite, let alone nanothermite to be at WTC. Because it was at WTC, the answer obviously is, as much as the experts who deal with these new nanothermites/superthermites determined was needed to blow up the three towers. But it is highly interesting that you go off on these silly tangents just like all the rest of the science deniers when you hit the brick wall. The better questions are the myriad questions I have asked which no one, not a one, will address. Why?

And that tells it all. You are in a perpetual state of jaundice even when you have no facts.

Obviously you don't remember or your teacher badly misled you. You can't make thermite from some aluminum cans and rust. And nanothermite was found at WTC, and the residues of thermitic reactions were found in huge amounts, some 1500 times normal. Didn't you read the info from the Lawrence Livermore scientists? It is in this thread, not too far back.

The crazy thing is that you don't even see how internally conflicted you are.

This shouldn't have to be like pulling teeth, Omni. If you are unable to explain, can you provide the place where you acquired your knowledge?

How does that explain the thermite?

Please explain, Omni.

Interesting point, Omni. Have you a source for this? Don't you think it is odd that you know this when pretty much everyone, NIST, US government, ... denies that there was any thermite, ever? What legitimate/legal reason was there for any thermite at WTC?

Let's get it straight what you are saying. Science has no place in determining the impossible collapses of three buildings. I have seen the videos, many many many more than you, many many many more times than you. And here you are also suggesting, scientifically I suspect you think, that we should focus on something we have all seen many times, as if that will give us some great scientific insights. Again, I told you that the video I linked you too addressed these issue of the planes hitting the towers, but you, like all the other science based MLWs refuse to watch or discuss it. Why?

I am not being unfair. There have been no replies on the science. B_C has made, to be kind, laughable claims, which she doesn't understand at all, which she has been soundly refuted about, by, [how many times does this have to be said before you will address it] the scientists from Lawrence Livermore Labs? The professor, not "your professor", that is dishonesty, has stated the case. Do you need "YOUR science deniers" [is that fair?] before you are able to discuss it?

It's pretty clear to you, a gentleman that avoids the science like the plague. A gentleman who lets/encourages his trusted scientist friends advance all manner of nonsense with not any discussion of same, with no links. People who won't answer direct questions, with material that directly refutes notions that they have just advanced. But "It's pretty clear what happened to me, anyway." Truly astonishing! What is even more astonishing is the silence from all the open minded westerners who reside at MLW. A sixteen year old young lady from Turkey has to point up how "western science" works.

You don't have time to address the science, with the direct link I provided you, but you want me to go searching for videos that support your non-science. That's just crazy. You don't even provide a link to a video you believe supports your "I don't even know what?". You just want silly goose chases to help with your distractions from the science. Because the video I linked to addressed your point head on. You must have watched some until your cognitive dissonance drove you crazy.