Omni

He has surrounded himself with some duds for sure: his kids, his son in law, Kelly Ann Conway, more recently Scaramucci,etc., but he does have a few smart people: Tillerson, Kelly, Sessions, etc., but he doesn't seem to have the brains to be able to determine which are which.

Another lengthy screed but what does all that have to do with what I asked you?

I wonder how many American "experts" think he wasn't?

And he still whines that all his troubles are the fault of the Dems., while most know who controls congress as well as the WH.

No way. Look what we have done with our freedom as regards the environment.

It actually is. Other than that you have verbiage. One question though, what forms of life do you suggest depend on us?

Sorry little buddy. No more time to waste proving you wrong again,.... and again.

Yeah, ha ha ha, a high school science teacher. Look back at what I have posted already to see why the NW corner of WTC 7 fell the way it did.

You can go bye bye whenever you want. Your nonsense is tiring to most.

You tried, but again you've been shown the "freefall" concept is not born out by reality.

This could get even more interesting now that Mueller has issued subpoenas, and begun probing Trump's finances with regard to the Russian issue. http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/03/politics/mueller-grand-jury/index.html

I can imagine it being an even more chaotic/tense day in the WH. I wonder if we will see further firings.

Gives you a bit of a thrill? How about Putin's?

Oh I think it's quite a stretch to try and say it's left or right ism. People on both sides of the political divide can understand science, and can also succumb to paranoia.

It's rather amazing what gobbledygook the conspiracy theorists will buy into seemingly endlessly. I see HE has now bought into the one "no planes" one. Funny in a way, but also bit frightening.

I guess because Trump is getting so much bad press theses days, he has to make up a fib or two about congratulatory phone calls. Oops, that seems to have back fired as well. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mexico-donald-trump-enrique-pena-nieto-us-immigration-policy-no-compliment-president-border-a7873781.html

I guess you are trying to say the bricks and mortar the building was built from were not illegal. Don't waste my time with such silly hair splitting.

Rad the link provided already.

His rights were violated and laws were broken in so doing. He had the right to sue, did so, and won.It's been explained to you a number of times already.

Stumped again are ya?

You think those people make up Donald's tweets for him do you?

Why? I love derailing you right wingers.

It certainly is if it can be proven that that conversation actually took place as described because it provides the magic ingredient "intent".

In all likelihood there will be a further step down the road tomorrow. It's hilarious to watch from this vantage point.

https://legalift.wordpress.com/2010/01/31/canadian-supreme-court-interrogation-of-khadr-at-guantanamo-was-illegal-but-orders-that-no-return-needed-now/ 24] We conclude that Canadian conduct in connection with Mr. Khadr’s case did not conform to the principles of fundamental justice. That conduct may be briefly reviewed. The statements taken by CSIS and DFAIT were obtained through participation in a regime which was known at the time to have refused detainees the right to challenge the legality of detention by way of habeas corpus. It was also known that Mr. Khadr was 16 years old at the time and that he had not had access to counsel or to any adult who had his best interests in mind. As held by this Court in Khadr 2008, Canada’s participation in the illegal process in place at Guantanamo Bay clearly violated Canada’s binding international obligations