Omni

I could give you some online flight instructions to show you just how easy it would be for even a fledgling pilot to fly a plane into a building.

"Indisputable"? hahahaha, "Excuse me Ma'am, I just have to get under your desk for a few minutes to drill a hole to install this explosive, won't take long". And only a few thousand times, and then all that det cord to hook it all together. Yep, nobody would have ever noticed that. It does matter, but not to conspiracy theorists because it totally upsets their apple cart. Keep tryin' l'il buddy. We're all amused.

I wouldn't have condemned you quite so harshly, however you still evade the questions, probably based on something like that.

I'll conclude then that you have no idea as to how to even try answer the two questions I have posed numerous times.

I see bent and twisted steel. I don't see molten steel. Between burning jet fuel and then the heat generated by the friction of tons of steel collapsing you would expect to find what your pictures show.

Molten steel is just another conjecture by the conspiracy theorists, and never been verified. and as I've already explained you can throw an aluminum beer can into a campfire and get what you guys claim is "proof" of explosives. So, I'll give you one more chance to answer 2 questions you have ducked forever; how much explosive would have had to be implanted in the buildings, and how did whoever you think put it there, get it there. Try and answer those for once, or, stfu.

I'm sure all this has been sent to you before. Conspiracy theorists seem to lack reading comprehension skills. http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/flight-school-owner-recalls-training-9-11-hijackers-1.951384

Arabs acquired the necessary skills in simulators in Florida.

"Digressives" are just happy being racists.

The evidence is alreay out there, and been provided for you multiple times. Conspiracy theorists have a serious one track "mind", and that's that. And as a pilot, I have already explained to you how easy it would be for even a low time guy to hit a building with a plane. Hey, have also you bought heavily into the Melania "body double" conspiracy too? Seems right up your alley.

sorry, your little movie seems simply a set up to suit conspiracy theorists. For one thing the suggestions that turns can't be made in a 75/767 at cruise speed is ridiculous. How do you think planes change course in mid flight to avoid weather for instance? Back to the drawing board li'l buddy.

On the very day one of the four US soldiers killed in Niger is being laid to rest, Trump chooses to simply keep up his tweet attack on the Florida congresswoman who called him out on his poorly worded call to the widow. He could have clarified with a follow up to the widow, or he could have just shut up. But no, in a flimsy attempt to deflect from the whole thing he also announces he is going to release docs. pertaining to the JFK assassination. Quite the "classy operator" the Donald! http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/21/politics/trump-tweets-wilson-gold-star/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/21/politics/trump-jfk-documents/index.html

If the company is not profitable ENOUGH, then shutting it down is a choice made by the owners, not because they are forced to by taxation.

Are you not aware you can order a portable GPS for ~300 bucks? So much for the navigation problem. And lots of people, myself included, soloed an airplane in under 10 hours. A solo flight means you have to perform a take off, a circuit, and a landing all by your little lonesome. That doesn't make you a skilled pilot, but it certainly makes you skilled enough to be able to just point a plane at a huge building and hit it. Ya know, when you're not really worried all that much about making a smooth landing.

So Kelly got caught in a heap of lies as he attacked the congresswoman who overheard the phone call, and then Sarah Sanders lies her friggin' head off from the podium of the white house to support the bs. How much more corrupt can this get I wonder?

A bit of a break from tradition to have two past presidents (Bush and Obama) individually smearing a sitting president in separate speeches. Even his own party is turning on him. I guess that is part of him making America great again? http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41689805

Well I'm fairly sure the courts do. Trump not so much apparently.

Regular trolling seems to be OK though.

Perhaps if he wasn't such a racist and understood the constitution, he could stop wasting your tax dollars tying up the courts by writing bad law.

Whoever the president is, they are in office to uphold the constitution, not abuse it. Trump should read it over sometime. Or at least have somebody explain it to him before he drags out his pen and make a big show of penning his signature to something that runs afoul of it.

No he's not, travel ban 3.0 was blocked yet again by a federal judge in Hawaii.

Trump gives himself a perfect score on his response to the Puerto Rico hurricane. Anybody with even half a brain would give him a kick in the ass. How far out of touch can this man be?

I came out just fine, and I don't own a company. Like most people.

You mean those big businesses who most of us work for?

Former US presidents historically refrain from criticizing others who have held that office, and especially a sitting POTUS but boy did both Bush and Obama blow that concept out of the water today. Names were not specifically mentioned but no doubt who each was focusing on. I imagine the tweets will be absolutely screeching out in the near future.