Omni

Why don't you answer a question...or two? Because you can't perhaps.

At least on this issue.

It's not B_C that needs help with facts.

Seems to me on this issue at least B_C is aware of the facts as I am. But it is fun to listen to the same old junk from the conspiracy theorists being regurgitated.

So let's start here: did planes fly into the WTC , or not in your mind?

Page 1 still tries to promote the idea that hijackers were "alleged", so it falls off the reality map right there. Sorry.

They're just scared shitless of death so they make up various story's to try to alleviate that fear. And of course millions got and get killed along the way. There ain't no god. When you die, you die. Ashes to ashes and all that.

The hijackers were anything but "alleged". Nor were the planes we all saw flying in at high speed. Have you found out yet what speed they were going?

And, there was no molten steel found in the rubble, only slag. Much different beast. Now how did they get the explosives in there?

And how did they get all those explosives planted?

I have discussed the science. Now how fast were the planes going?

It's not a start. I reached my conclusions, based on science, a long time ago. So if you can't explain how the explosives got integrated into the buildings, let me ask you about the speed of the aircraft as they hit. I've heard truthers try to say that the buildings were designed to be hit by an airliner without falling down.

Unreacted thermite is composed essentially of elemental aluminum and iron oxide. Lots of both when you crash an airliner into a building such as the WTC. You would expect to find aluminum oxide and metallic iron, no thermite reaction needed to explain it. But you still dodge the question of how the building was "rigged" as you folks like to suggest, but never address.

How many metric tonnes of thermite do you reckon it would take to knock down the WTC towers? and how do you get it installed. Let's start there.

Heat and materials my friend. Or are you so far along the truther line you don't think the planes actually hit the buildings?

Still waiting for your explanation of how they got all these explosives embedded in the building. But you are right, no hijacker had it. They made it on site by smashing an aluminum airplane into a building containing a lot of steel and aluminum and creating a huge fireball from all that jetfuel.

Pop can on a campfire, sorry if that flummoxes you. But again, support how you think they loaded enough tons of explosives in those towers. "Oh sorry ma'am, we just need to rip your office wall apart just now and install some "stuff", won't be long dear" Right!

No brick wall here. I am always surprised when the truthers come out bashing their heads against one though. You haven't explained how all those "explosives" got installed in the towers.

Throw an empty pop can on a campfire and see what you get. It's clear who is being misled here, but the 9-11 "truthers" like their conspiracy theories, no matter how often they are debunked. How much thermite do you think it would take to bring down a building like the WTC, and how would you install it?

Grade 10 science class if I remember correctly.

Aluminum and iron oxide. That's what was found. Guess what planes are made of.

What's to explain? Planes flew into the WTC's at high speed, we all saw it, and the buildings were damaged to the point they collapsed.

Correct. That's where the whole "controlled demolition" theory falls apart.

You don't seem to understand that there was nowhere near enough thermite found in the rubble to have brought down an igloo let alone structure like the WTC towers.

I've traveled through various parts of Europe many times just to get to Africa or the ME and I never worry. I guess if you;re the type who wants to simply sit on the Sun Tours bus and drive around and then run back into the Holiday Inn then yeah, you're probably the type that worries too much. so stay home and out of the way of real travelers.