Altai

This is what I mean, if you are not able to prove what you claim, you simply should not be allowed to claim. According to your mind, I can shot someone and I can claim that I didnt intend to shot him but I just thought that there was a snake on his head and trying to shot that snake and I should not be punished for killing someone ??? does it sound logical ??? Also if you are a person with good intends, you would not make claims that you cant prove.

I dont like to read or write long posts. Free speech is being abused most of the time to spread lies and provoke people. For example according to Oxford Universty, 49% of the politics news in my country is fake. This is the result of uncontrolled free speech. It should not be allowed, its sooooooo dangerous. If you have an objection against something, if you think that there are somethings wrong, you just need to go to the court. Positive free speech will end up with a happy public life, negative one will just cause a chaos. Most of the govts controls people's speech while they falsely make them to believe they have freedom of speech.

Its called democracy because people have the power of changing it. (According to claims, I am not a democracy fan)

Nonsense. If something is legal, this means people are allowed to perform it. This is why its called democracy. If you or your represantives in the parliament think that its something wrong and should be changed, there are legal prodecures to apply for a change. This is the only thing that you or your represantives can do to involve. In other case, it will be just a chaos because everyone has their own personal interests and therefore everyone has some laws they dont like and will speak against with hatred. So as I say always, if you have a problem, go to the closes court and prove it or just shut up.

So you accept the killing of 38 people as massacre who illegally cross border in terror zone but you reject it when it is 7000 innocent civilians because it does not serve your interests. This is exactly the kaffir mind. You and people like you have no place in society life. For example you claim 3 million people are massacred, can you prove it in a court ? Why there is no cases filed in the courts about such a huge "massacre" ? Do you know why ? Because you guys are sick. Many of your leaders are criminals that approved by Malaysia War Crimes Courts, if you claim they are not, just take your best lawyers and prove they are not. Can you do that ? You cant, do you know why, because you guys are sick.

I dont think I gave a reply that difficult to understand. If slave owning is regarded as something legal in your society, then people must not be allowed to speak hateful against owning slave, you cant speak hateful and incite hatred against something legal. If you think that slavery is something wrong, you should ban it first. If you allow it but you also think that its something wrong, you are probably metally sick.

Real World ? you cant even give logical answers to my questions. I said why 7000 people are not mentioned, you have no reply, I said why the last two massacre is labeled as "unknown" despite it is committed by PKK ? you have no reply. Okay I am asking another one, your real world record source says that 38 people are massacred, these 38 guys were bombed by airforces while they are illegally crossing the border in terror zone with donkeys loaded with unknown things. Is it something normal to cross border illegally in terror zone ?

Really ? IQ1500. Thanks. You source includes many fake-false data. For example why does it not include at least 7000 people murdered by PKK terror organization in last 30 years ? or why the last two "massacres" are identified as unknown despite they are committed by PKK ?

Excuse me, did you read your own "sources" before copy-paste it ? For example which one of these "massacres" in the first link is the responsiblity of current Turkish govt ?

If it is a hate that will harm society life, it must not be allowed.

You are lying as usual, Western countries like to lie about other countries when they face with their crimes. Its the vile form of self defence. You guys should be judged and sentenced.

This is what exactly I mean, according to your sick mind, dividing people into pieces in other countries is "peace keeping" while hypocritically and ironically you assimilate native people in America.

I dont think it matters whether or not they were intended to harm you. What matters is whether or not they harm you. If you remember, there was another topic about a woman stops on the highway to help someones and causes another crash that kills some other people. Maybe she was not trying to harm people but still she did it and sentenced. The same thing goes for fake news too. You will be engraved in minds with something you never did. You will lose your job, people wont like you, you will have socializing problems, maybe someones will try to kill you, you will be an unhappy person. All of them because of a media agency prepares an "unintended" fake news. Sorry this should not be allowed.

Most of the time you cant know that. Humanbeing is prone to be lazzy and in general they avoid thinking deeply and detailed, so they simply choose to believe in what they are told as long as it fits their personal interests. For example 9 people are murdered by truck driver and media told you he was a Muslim, you didnt need to ask what is the proof or evidence, you simply believed it because this is what you want to hear. The largest and most famous media companies works in this way, they tell you a little real and many lies. The real solution to solve this problem is to be able to sue media companies based on their news and enforcing sanctions if they cant prove what they claim. Here another problem appears, everyday media prepares many news that dont contain any definite judgment, for examle such a title "The poster named JamesHacker PM may be murdered his mother". So they dont need to prove anything even if you sue them because they didnt say you did, they said "maybe". Or another example "Serial killers and Muslims has a common point, both of them are addicted to drink water". Are you able to sue such a news title ? Probably no. This is called negative perception managament or in Islamic saying "fitnah".

Please stop keeping peace around the World. Western countries are not interested with peace, they are interested with what they could steal from other countries and they name it as "peace keeping".

Total number of terrorists killed in the region rises to at least 3991.

Update: Afrin City center seized by Turkish Army and rebel groups in the day 58.

Turkish Airforces shot the excavator which is used by terrorists to stop civilians.

Civilians with long vehicles convoy trying to leave city Afrin. Terrorists shut down the road with excavators.

Civilians trying to leave city but "peaceful", "secular", "ISIS killer", "brave crazy fighters" dont allow them to leave to use them as shields.

Day 55 Totally at least 3545 terrorists are killed, 45 soldiers are martyred.

Hawkings cheates his wife and divorces her, who was married with him despite she knows he was ill and gives him two kids. Does not seem like he was "great" enough.

A "scientist" who rejects "existence of a creative power", one of most basic scientific fact. So a "scientist" that simply rejects math.

We call it as "information" when it is something proven. When its not certain %100, its not an information but a possiblity and anything is possible in life. There is no need possiblities to be considered as long as they are not "strong" possiblities. If you look at a pic and describe it different, you need to share your causes of your descriptions, so you need to tell people what information your descriptions depends on. When you do that, other people will start to see the same things with you. Most of the religion and their rules are just imaginal things, created by people in their imagine World. So their content in general are not backed up by informations. There are many political parties because all of them contradicts with each other on some points. Because politicians and people rejects information when it does not fit with their personal ego. If they are disagreeing with someone by rejecting information, yes this make them hypocrite and liar and some other vile adjectives. This is the point as you admit, you are creating your path based on your personal believes, not based on information. Yes most of the time when you and me had a communication, you were acting hypocrite, I hope you give it up and start to be a honest person. None is perfect and ofcourse I have mistakes in my life as any other person but most of the time I am aware of my mistakes and trying to be much more mature person with each passing day. I am trying not to perform same mistakes. For example currently I may be a bit brutal while talking to you about your mistakes and what I am doing is a mistake, I am aware of it but I simply dont care.

This is the truth. Like it or not. People cant be disagree as long as they have the same informations. If they have the same information and still there are problems, its because of at least one of the sides rejects to recognize information and logical conclusions based on information because its against their personal interests. You guys and I think many people on the World, maybe sometimes me, behave such. At least I am aware of it and I am trying my best to avoid behave such. Such people are not worth to talk, we talk people and share informations with each other to solve problems. You cant solve any problem with obsessed-hypocrite-liar people. There is no point to talk to them.