Altai

Today its Happy Canada day. Canadian Christians and Atheists celebrate the invasion and massacre of Native American people.

and this is definitely about a Christian or Atheist guy.

Christian or Atheist guy murder people. We exactly dont know what was his belief because Western countries are not interested with it as long as the person is not an immigrant from countries with people mostly claiming of being "Muslims". https://globalnews.ca/news/4306929/buck-lake-death-armed-dangerous-alberta-rcmp/

You should visit my "Whether or not there is God" topic before making comments about this topic. You can see there how atheists rejects information and logic when it does not fit with their interest. Atheist rejects the existence of God despite its scientifically proven, just because they dont like the idea. You guys are not honest people. You can also visit my "What is homosexuality, a scientific fact or a perversion" topic in club named "DataVis". You can see there how atheists rejects the science because they dont like the results. If its proven that God is exist and its proven that the rules which is offered as God's rules are exactly belongs to God, this is the true thing to follow.

Okay I will talk in accordance with your IQ level. We make laws based on their rationality. We say its illegal to run in red light in traffic because it will cause disorders. Does not matter whether or not this law was told us in a religious book or we find it out ourselves. Its logical in any case and therefore its superior because its logical.

I had a topic which may be related to this topic. Named "You are ruled by Sharia". Which refers to the similarities between Islamic rules and countries' laws. As I am saying always, logic based on the same info will come together in the same place. They cant be dissociated. People disagrees with each other because they dont have the same information (this is not a sustainable disagreement because they will share the info with each other) or most commonly at least one of the sides rejects to recognize information or logic based on the information when it does not fit with their personal interests.

Turkish players are going to leave German national team. German media and fans start a scribbling campaign against Turkish players since they have met with President Erdogan during his visit to Germany in the past weeks. They are directly blaming Turkish players as the reason for their elimination from the cup. (lmao) I congratulate the South Korea by the way.

They were probably saying the same to thing their enemies. "Keep dreaming".

History is the graveyard of many countries which were much stronger than US when compared to their era. US will be a part of this graveyard sooner or later but for sure.

I think my posts are pretty clear. Read them again instead of asking similar things.

Yes, it only would be allowed if the speaker also says that it will make the voting invalid.

Stop running away when Muslim Turkish Army approach. US said they will defend Afrin, now Afrin is controlled by Turkiye. Now they say they will defend Manbij and we will see what is going to happen.

You can find millions of examples yourself. As I said logic based on the same info does not vary from person to person, its the same for everyone. For examle saying "Vote for Tredeau and put a cross on other candidates on your ballot". It will make your choice invalid when you mark more than one person or party.

Turkish Army have cleaned Afrin from terrorists. Now Turkish govt wants Western countries and Western backed terror organization members to leave Manbij.

Logic determines the negative speech.

Logic based on the same information does not var from person to person. It is the same for everyone. Any negative speech will harm others.

Look you are proving my point further. You dont even believe in me that I didnt intended to insult you but I was just trying to show you how it will affect our communication, because hate speech is harmful and any negative speech which is not proven is hate speech. Please stop rejecting science when it does not fit with your interests. You should have heard about suggestion method which is often used by intelligence services and media. Because talks affect you and you dont have right to affect people in negative manner just because of you want to talk. You rights end up when it starts to harm others.

Sorry, I didnt inteded to insult you, I just wanted to see your reaction. So as you see, you start to target my person too by asking me why I join your site when I insult you. Because it harms you and you react it with the same manner. This is just a simple example for the harm of unlimited free speech to the community peace.

..................................................

Any speech is hate speech when it starts to pose danger for others. You must prove your claims in legal manners or you must not be allowed to speak. You cant disturb others just because of you dont like somethings. Iraq was invaded based on "unlimited freedom of speech". Britain claimed unreal things and they invaded Iraq together US. After long years and millions of deaths, Britain simply said that the claims were false.

I said I wont read long posts.

Its a bad thing promoted like something good, unlimited freedom of speech. Anything has a limit. Especially when it start to be harmful. I think this was the subject of the topic.

You should tell these things in a court.

Probably most of the people who lose a case thinks that they were right, just the law cheated them. There are many murderers, thieves, terrorists thinks that they were right. Anyone has an excuse for their actions.

Yes, if it poses a threat for public life, it should be proven in the court to be applied. The same thing goes for any other believes including atheism. Its your idea as an atheist that nothing could be demonstrated to be true about religions. Atheist people rejects to recognize many facts when it does not fit with their interests. I had a topic before about it in this forum, you can see the atheist behavior there. So such a case filed in a court would probably end up with the banning of atheism.