Goddess
-
Posts
6,311 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
78
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Goddess
-
-
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:
You might as well yell that at clouds. He didn't take in 1% of what you wrote.
I don't think he's able to assimilate new information.
He's still spewing long debunked propaganda from the beginning of covid.
Either he's being deliberately deceptive or is truly so mentally deficient that he cannot comprehend anything new.
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, eyeball said:
Soon they'll even have a vaccine for the vaccine.
There are protocols for de-toxxing from the spike.
-
2 minutes ago, eyeball said:
Spread by word of mouth?
Speaking of milk is it safe to assume this protein you mentioned would make breastfeeding especially dangerous?
Spike protein (which we know is the most toxic part of the virus) has been found in breastmilk, yes.
There was a recent study that it was causing gastro-bleeding in infants.
This is why medical ethics usually don't force pregnant women to take experimental drugs.
At the time the jabs were forced on everyone, there was of course - no long-term studies.
Fun experiment, eh?
-
16 minutes ago, eyeball said:
But it's actually come to the point where you people now shun the vaccinated?
There are sites now for unvaxxed dating.
Conversely, on some of the dating sites, people will openly say they won't date an unvaxxed person.
**shrugs**
That's what I've been told anyways - I'm not on the dating sites.
Met my man the old fashioned way.
-
13 minutes ago, eyeball said:
Congratulations! I mean that too.
But it's actually come to the point where you people now shun the vaccinated? Are you afraid of catching something or having kids with three eyes?
Shedding of the spike protein.
And fertility for the younger ones.
-
Six new academic papers have been published linking covid mRNA vaccines to cancer in just the last 2 weeks, bringing the running total now to twenty-six.
Here’s a list of the six new papers:
-
(2024 April, Zhang and El-Deiry) - SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells.
-
(2024 April, Rubio-Casillas et al) - Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?
-
(2024 April, Gibo et al) - Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.
-
(2024 April, Abdurrahman et al) - Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine.
-
(2024 April, Ueda et al) - Fetal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case.
-
(2024 April, Gentilini et al) - A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty®: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature.
Of course, these cancer papers follow a long, significant trend of papers — thousands now — linking injuries apart from myocarditis to the jabs.
Yet the CDC and the FDA still only recognize myocarditis/pericarditis as legitimate covid vaccine injuries.
-
-
3 minutes ago, eyeball said:
Has anyone proposed naming high schools in your honour or have admirers sent you their underwear?
How is the Nobel committee coming along with your studies and datasets?
A marriage proposal from someone who won't date a jabbed woman.
Does that count?
-
3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
I don't know anyone personally who admits that they're still getting jabbed.
A couple months ago, I heard my neighbours (who are lovely people and great neighbours) talking outside about which 4th booster they were going to get - Moderna or Pfizer.
What can you do with these ones? Shrug and sigh.
-
10 minutes ago, Moonbox said:
Rest assured it's not because all the Facebook Karens who did their own research convinced them via quackery.
I've shown many of my friends the studies and datasets, no quackery.
Lots of them have come to ME, now that they recognize the giant mind-fu*k that went on the last few years and told me "you were right."
-
1 minute ago, eyeball said:
I hear you, I'm definitely looking forward to tax breaks and way less red-tape. I miss the old school days when I could haul logs home from the National Park and sell them under the table.
Has Poilievre said anything about how big a tax refund I can expect or how much guvmint he'll keep off my back?
Gah.
If only you had asked these questions of Trudeau before becoming such a super fan of woke.
Polievre has said repeatedly he would reduce gov't size and control.
Who knows?
Maybe he's a secret totalitarian dictator, like the Turd turned out to be.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
You pick your experts and I will pick mine LOL
Haha 😄
I picked the true experts.
You picked the liars and grifters.
-
1
-
-
Amongst my jabbed friends, very few are still getting the jabbers.
Reasons expressed to me:
- the jabs did not do what was promised
- they still got covid, some multiple times
- they know people who have been injured by them or just "haven't felt good" since getting them
- they realize covid was never the threat it was made out to be
- they resented being forced to get them in the first place to keep jobs and won't get further ones if not forced to
- many have woken up to the fact that "coivd" was a fire drill for further control
No one has expressed that they are just "too lazy" to go get further jabs.
-
1
-
2 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
Your ilk keeps bringing up "old" links and I can play that game too LOL
"old" links from the experts I was following, have all been proven to have been accurate.
Just sayin'
-
On 4/9/2024 at 11:11 PM, Zeitgeist said:
but really lockdowns should’ve been questioned and the freedom of movement preserved throughout the pandemic.
I was just reading one man's experience of trying to visit his favourite 97 year old aunt recently. She had denied his visits for the last 4 years, scared silly of the virus.
QuoteOn Sunday night, Richie and I had visited Aunt Jane. On the drive in his SUV to her building on Sunday evening, Richie told me his Mom had told him she only wanted me to visit if he brought me there. Lowering my expectations, he said she wouldn’t want me there for more than 15 minutes. Too many germs flying around after that.
While Jane is a very pleasant person, she always struck me as appropriately skeptical and instinctively countercultural. On visits when we were all younger, she would wave her hand to dismiss stuff about which other people got excited and even make fun of it in her folksy twang. On the ride over on Sunday night, Richie agreed with this assessment of his mother.
I asked him why, then, she uncharacteristically bought into Coronamania. Richie was also mystified. He said she wasn’t afraid for the first few weeks. But then, as if someone had flipped a switch, she suddenly got spooked by a thing she called “CO-vee.” I suspect her fear derived from the histrionic TV Covid coverage, or from something the people in her building saw on TV and told her about.
After the fear set in, Richie said, Jane only went outside for those drive-up meetings with Sharon. And she’d only let Richie inside briefly to deliver stuff and run the vacuum.
When Richie and I arrived, we climbed the stairs to Jane’s third floor unit. Jane opened her door. She gave me a long hug and began to cry. Richie and I went in and sat on a small sofa facing Jane as she sat on a chair.
Jane is 98 now, four years older than the last time I saw her. She’s still remarkably, almost unbelievably, sharp. She also hears well, unaided.
Fifteen minutes came and went without anyone noticing that it had. We ended up talking for two and a half hours. Jane was fully locked on the whole time. She responded immediately and appropriately to everything Richie or I asked or said. In return, she intermittently asked us a bunch of fitting questions. She shared the conversation flawlessly and never repeated herself. Jane is more conversationally adept than are most people much younger than she is. Though she says her balance isn’t so good anymore.
Jane dropped out of school in the sixth grade to raise her siblings. Even as an adult, she never had much money. But here she is, outliving 99% of Americans and being more coherent than are many people in their seventies and eighties with college degrees. I’m sure Jane never did any aerobics or ate any sprouts.
When I asked Jane how she’d been since I last saw her, she said she stays in her apartment all day, every day. This isn’t how she used to be. Even at 94, she used to walk down hilly streets to buy food and go to church, and not just on Sundays. And then back up those hills.
Before the Scamdemic, she also used to go each day to a common room in her high-rise to hang out with other tower dwellers. Two of Jane’s sisters lived in the building, though one died last year. She doesn’t go to that gathering place anymore to see her surviving sister or anyone else. She has seen her beloved adult grandchildren and their kids, i.e., her three great-grandchildren, only once or twice in the past four years.
I didn’t ask Jane why she had become reclusive or directly try to talk her out of hiding. I just wanted to accompany her for a few hours. I only mentioned, when it felt appropriate, that the virus wasn’t so bad, that I didn’t hide from it or take the shots and had been fine. I hoped that saying so might help to put her mind at ease.
Jane’s apartment is nice enough and very neatly kept. But it’s very simply appointed, with neutral-colored walls. And it’s tiny, with an eight-foot ceiling and insufficient window area. It’s a place to shelter, cook and eat food, read, watch some TV and sleep. It’s not a place to be 24/7/365.
But for four years, Jane has never left except for the odd doctor’s appointment. It’s downright painful to imagine this.
It’s been deeply cruel for the government and newscasters to scare the elderly into such isolation during the past four years. Even at her age, Jane was 95+% likely to survive infection. More to the point, infection or no, at 98, tomorrow isn’t guaranteed. Nor at 97. Or 87, Or 77. Or 67.
Life is too short to live in fear of dying. Under what conditions does life become not worth living?
It was great to share that recent time with Jane. But it was tragic for someone who enjoys other peoples’ company to have spent so much time alone over the past four years. Her absence has also been a big loss to the others with whom she would have spent time if she hadn’t feared for her life. Being around Jane makes me happy. I’m sure she used to make others feel the same way.
When I left, Jane and I hugged and she teared up again. I concluded that her reaction to my arrival and departure showed how deeply, cumulatively she missed the face-to-face human contact that she’s been terrorized into avoiding.
Multiply her Scamdemic isolation by billions of people, old, young and in-between. Many insisted that lockdowns protected the elderly. But locking down took the limited time that the old had left and made their final years miserable.
There’s no punishment too severe for the evil opportunists who stoked such unwarranted fear and loneliness.
-
11 minutes ago, Moonbox said:
Just like how so many folk don't play a sport or go to the gym as soon as highschool is over. It's not because they think exercise is bad. It's because they're lazy. 🙃
OK.
If you think it's "laziness" that uptake fell from 90% to 15%, and that the massive decline is no way indicates people have become disillusioned with the claimed safety and efficacy of the shots.....I ain't gonna argue with you.
They still think the shots are miracles of science, but are just too "lazy".
Knock yourself out, man.
-
1
-
-
"All sorts of reasons"
Haha🤣
When uptake goes from almost 90% when forced and terror-driven by media fear-porn 24/7, down to 15% when given actual choice.....well.
So.
-
12 hours ago, CdnFox said:
Yes actually - well medical data anyway:
just 15 percent of canadians though the vaccines were a good idea in 2023.
That's down from 80%. And the doctors were still advising everyone to do it - signs were up at every pharmacy, heard it on the news quite a bit.
But people ain't buying it. Only those in severe at risk groups. People no longer think the vaccines are a good idea at all.
Kind of goes to show the whole "choice" aspect of it was so much BS.
When the gov't doesn't have its jackboots on the necks of people, they seem to make different "choices".
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:
Honestly - he knows. The mental gymnastics he and others are doing to dodge the simple facts is olympic, but at the end of the day they know they're wrong.
People were forced by threat to take a drug without knowing what the side effects were and without significant proof that it would safeguard anyone else's life. And some died from that.
It's like a religion - evidence-free and entirely based on faith and hope, nary a fact in sight.
-
17 hours ago, ExFlyer said:
Whatever.
From a 2020 publication
"Myocarditis has been recognized as a rare complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccinations, especially in young adult and adolescent males."
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135
2020? Erm, okay.
Try to keep up - in the convening 4 years since then, multiple studies have shown that myocarditis is not RARE and much more likely to occur post-vax than from the virus itself.
Ask any reputable cardiologist - myocarditis is never "mild". Stats are that 50% of those diagnosed with it, will die within 5 years.
AND multiple studies have shown the mechanism for why young people are dying on sporting fields - the adrenaline rush, combined with undiagnosed heart issues post-vax induces heart attacks during exertion.
17 hours ago, ExFlyer said:A very early study of side effects.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2787361
Again - many newer studies are available.
-
29 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
It was not communicated.
And only reluctantly recognized after thousands of children already had been given vax-induced heart problems.
The latest:
Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a UK based cardiologist, recently gave a presentation at a Helsinki Inquiry on this:
Does 1 in 6000 and 1 in 2700 seem "rare" to you?
Would you say that this is a good cost/benefit ratio, considering teens and young adults face a statistically zero risk of severe or fatal covid?
Link to his presentation:
-
Ya, every time my sister's legs go out from under her and she cracks her head on the floor or walls, from the neurological condition she got from the vax, I tell her to quit whining, get over it and move on.
I don't understand why she keeps at this after over 2 years, it's been sooooooo long and we're all tired of hearing about it.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:
I think both nancy and the gov't have the same problem in that respect.
I could understand the argument "Well, we made the best choices with the information we had at the time and even tho later evidence shows we made some bad decisions given the circumstances at that moment we believe we did the right thing". I would disagree with it but at least it would be logically defensible as a rational position
But instead we get denial and "why are you still talking", etc etc. And that seriously concerns me
I kind of disagree with this, as the gov't has been found to have deliberately funded fake studies in order to impose restrictions.
Remember the infamous Canadian-gov't-funded study that said the unvaxxed were more likely to be the cause of car accidents? 🤪
When Pseudoscience, Politics & Fraud Converge
What lengths will ideologically or financially-driven researchers and politicians go to impose their will upon others?
Throughout the pandemic we've witnessed a slide from objective clinical research to easily manipulated "real-world" studies to purely fictional simulations completely detached from reality. "Consensus" (aka groupthink) quickly replaced scientific scrutiny and civil discourse plummeted. It became difficult to discern scientific recommendations from political talking points.
On April 25, 2022 a very dangerous line was crossed. Leaders in the Canadian research and medical community rubber-stamped a clearly fraudulent study. Its overarching purpose: to use "science" to justify discrimination, sow hatred and reinterpret the notion of inalienable rights.
Within hours of the study's official publication, dozens of articles in top national papers flooded Canada warning of the dire risk of merely hanging out with unvaccinated people — selfish souls who refused to accept the new genetic COVID-19 vaccines. The "unvaccinated" were compared to carriers of syphilis, intoxicated drivers and reckless individuals who had no regard for others.
Can't get an operation? Blame the unvaccinated! The "science" says so.
But did it? This book examines:- The man, the politics and the intent behind the faux study.
- How researchers concocted results to overwrite reality & scapegoat the unvaccinated.
- The Establishment's willingness to go along with the fraud.
- How political ideology fed into the analysis.
- How the research is being used to swindle Canadians out of their Charter rights & freedoms.
An Investigative Look Into Fisman's Precedent-Setting Hate Science
“FISMAN’S FRAUD is both a disturbing and an exhilarating read. The book exposes what is effectively a crime scene with various agents complicit in producing fraudulent science that was used by media and the Prime Minister to fuel hatred and societal division. Watteel reveals in precise detail how every system of oversight and accountability, from the University of Toronto to the Ontario Provincial Police failed in their duty to act with integrity. The exhilarating aspect is that the book shines a bright light on those responsible. Watteel names names and calls them out for what they are - morally bankrupt. Fisman’s Fraud gives hope that by exposing the fraud justice may prevail and civility restored to this Nation.” — Ted Kuntz, President Vaccine Choice Canada
“FISMAN’S FRAUD is a must read that slices through the layers of lost integrity, accountability and responsibility to reveal the greatest deception of our time. Easy to read but hard to swallow, the facts speak volumes in implicating those in power who intentionally failed to keep the ship off the rocks. Although the content is specific to Ontario, the implications were deadly, far-reaching and the situation warrants further investigation. Those responsible are currently still at the helm and the ship is in dangerous waters.” — Vincent A Gircys, Veteran Police Constable, Ontario Provincial Police - Forensic Collision Reconstructionist-
1
-
Yes. So hilarious.
Why do you think Canada didn't use the $2 billion in ventilators?
Who cares, right? It's only $2 billion and thank gawd Frank Bayliss, Liberal party insider, was able to make a f*c9ton of money off them.
-
1
-
-
52 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:
I will say that it is amazing how the most ordinary of folks (on both sides) instantly became epidemiologists and doctors.
I worked in medical for years and spent my lunch hours reading medical journals and studies. Not a doctor or nurse, but I started this with better-than-average knowledge.
If more people had even a basic understanding of virology and epidemiology, perhaps fewer would have fallen for the faux experts.
Most of the "experts" touted by the press were actually not top experts, they were lower on the educational rungs of the ladder - the top experts in these fields were silenced and cancelled for pointing out obvious medical malfeasance.
Most of the over-reactions were based on models and Neil Ferguson of Imperial College in the UK was the top modeler used, in spite of years of false predictions and then being caught diddling around with his mistress during the lockdowns he insisted be imposed on everyone else. While people like John Ionniadis, who had a record of level-headedness, were vilified and discredited.
85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
For an injection that is "100% safe and 95% effective", the government is sure shelling out a lot for vax injuries in this budget: $36 million. $19 million for this year and $17 million for next year.
By the end of 2022, the program had paid out $2.8 million.
One year later, it had paid out $11.2 million.
Quite an exponential increase for vax injury funding. Seems like what the gov't is saying and where they are putting their money, isn't quite aligning.
Why would a vaccine injury support program need infusion of $36 million taxpayer dollars for what has been described as essentially a NON-ISSUE, that no one cares about, and no one is allowed to talk about?