Jump to content

Goddess

Senior Member
  • Posts

    6,300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    77

Posts posted by Goddess

  1. 4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

    I glanced at this and don't see a date on this article, but I see the research ends sometime in 2022.

    I posted much more recent studies on myocarditis after covid vax in the Trickle thread.

    This article is extremely out-dated.

    Sort of what happens when you just do a quick google, instead of actual research. 🙄

    You should really check who funds the studies, too:

     

    Quote

    PH reports being a member of an expert group, Future Rheumatology Advisory Board (2016 and 2017), funded by Pfizer;

    Quote

    research projects funded by Novo Nordisk

    Quote

    clinical trials funded by Novo Nordisk, GSK, AstraZeneca

    Quote

    a research project funded by Sanofi-Aventis

    Quote

    RL has received a lecture fee from Pfizer

     

  2. 29 minutes ago, eyeball said:

    As for myocarditis...

    Conclusions Compared with myocarditis associated with covid-19 disease and conventional myocarditis, myocarditis after vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines was associated with better clinical outcomes within 90 days of admission to hospital.

    https://bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000373

    I glanced at this and don't see a date on this article, but I see the research ends sometime in 2022.

    I posted much more recent studies on myocarditis after covid vax in the Trickle thread.

    This article is extremely out-dated.

    Sort of what happens when you just do a quick google, instead of actual research. 🙄

  3. Did you know that the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to make Moderna’s and Pfizer’s shots were re-purposed to serve as vaccine platforms? They were originally intended to be a delivery mechanism for drugs and/or gene therapies.

    The reason LNPs were rejected as a platform, is that the LNPs were toxic if administered multiple times. And treatment of cancers and other diseases with LNPs required multi-dosing protocols.

    For this reason, several companies abandoned the use of LNPs.

    But Moderna decided to change course and use LNPs as a vaccine delivery system. Why? Because they understood that an ideal vaccine is one that requires a single dose. 

    Here is Health Canada’s official definition of an ideal vaccine here: 

    Quote

    “An ideal vaccine is: safe with minimal adverse effects; effective in providing lifelong protection against disease after a single dose that can be administered at birth; inexpensive; stable during shipment and storage; and easy to administer.“

     

    So, problem solved. A good LNP-based vaccine would require only a single dose. No multi-dosing = none of the toxicities known to be associated with multiple administrations of LNPs.

    Compare to Stéphane Bancel's comments, CEO of Moderna, which was published on September 13, 2016.

    Note his serious concerns about the LNPs that his company is using: 

     

    Quote

     

    “In nature, mRNA molecules function like recipe books, directing cellular machinery to make specific proteins. Moderna believes it can play that system to its advantage by using synthetic mRNA to compel cells to produce whichever proteins it chooses. In effect, the mRNA would turn cells into tiny drug factories. It’s highly risky. Big pharma companies had tried similar work and abandoned it because it’s exceedingly hard to get RNA into cells without triggering nasty side effects.”

    “Delivery – actually getting RNA into cells – has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets. They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years. 

    Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche.”

     

    It's not just the spike protein (which there is no mechanism in the jabs to stop your body from producing) that is toxic.

    The LNPs are, as well.

     

    (But I'm sure it's just the breakfast food thing that eyeball thinks.)

    9 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

    First, I know you have problems with sources and citations in general, but an MS word doc from some random unpublished source is about as bad as they come.  

    Opening  MS Word docs on random websites is like digital Darwinism.  

     

    You can go see it on their website.

    It's the JCCF - the lawyers who won the Emergency Act case against Trudeau.

    • Haha 1
  4. 15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

    I'm sure its just horseshit...

    In the meantime, according to epidemiologists, here's what excess mortality due to COVID looks like.

    undefined

    The COVID-19 pandemic in Spain caused significant excess mortality (expected rate in black, with confidence intervals in gray). Reporting lags lead to undercounting in the latest (rightmost) data.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_mortality

    I think we've covered the sketchy way "covid deaths" were counted, quite a few times.

    Remember the 14 year old boy in AB with terminal brain cancer who was "tested" for covid while in a coma, hours before his death and thus....counted and announced as a covid death?

  5. So, according to the eyeball, there is a 0% chance that the UK's 680% with a z-score of 19 spike in neurodegenerative diseases, is caused by millions of people being forced to inject an experimental vax with no long-term studies and that the more likely culprit is a change in people's breakfast food choices.  No need to investigate.

    Well, I'm reassured.

    Are you?

    • Haha 1
  6. 6 minutes ago, eyeball said:

    Exactly. The better conclusion is that the things you're attributing to vaccine have nothing at all to do with protein spikes. You might as well be blaming fluoride, chemtrails or whatever you had for breakfast that day.

     

    2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

    Weird how so many health conditions and excess deaths have sky-rocketed since the vax rollout, though.

    I'm sure it's just a coincidence.......

    This is some UK data recently posted:

    Excess NEW Neuropathy claims in UK are up 680% as of October 2023, started to rise in 2021. A Z-score of 19.

    1.thumb.jpg.0fcebfefda056a144a390fd5ef4eab99.jpg

    Is a 680% rise in claims with a z-score of 19, a lot?

    In case you are interested, Total NEW excess disability claims for all body systems in the UK were up:

    • 2.4% in 2019
    • 2.9% in 2020
    • 20.5% in 2021
    • 76.7% in 2022 
    • 69.1% in 2023

    2.thumb.jpg.c4111fbab34a850c6e0587a71dfd5df9.jpg

    Did I mention Z-scores?  Yes, I did.

    • Haha 1
  7. 3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

    Exactly. The better conclusion is that the things you're attributing to vaccine have nothing at all to do with protein spikes. You might as well be blaming fluoride, chemtrails or whatever you had for breakfast that day.

    Weird how so many health conditions and excess deaths have sky-rocketed since the vax rollout, though.

    I'm sure it's just a coincidence.......

  8. One thing I am really starting to wonder about:

    The difference in symptoms and ailments of those afflicted with covid, compared to the symptoms and ailments of those who have adverse reactions to the covid vax. 

    They are completely different.

    Covid symptoms/ailments: coughing, fever, body aches, sniffles..... flu-like symptoms.

    Vax adverse events symptoms/ailments: stroke, brain aneurysm, blood clots, heart attacks, paralysis, blindness, mass skin rashes, anaphylaxis, coma, death.

    In the first group, the former, we have flu like symptoms. In the second group, the latter, from the vax, we see documented neuro-degenerative symptoms like muscle spasms and paralysis, cardiac issues, fertility issues....to name only a few.  It's quite unique in vaccinology how this vax creates issues in sooooo many completely different bodily systems.

    Why the huge difference if the virus and the vaccine both contain the SPIKE PROTEIN?

  9. 2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

    For an injection that is "100% safe and 95% effective", the government is sure shelling out a lot for vax injuries in this budget:  $36 million.  $19 million for this year and $17 million for next year.

    By the end of 2022, the program had paid out $2.8 million.

    One year later, it had paid out $11.2 million.

    Quite an exponential increase for vax injury funding.  Seems like what the gov't is saying and where they are putting their money, isn't quite aligning.

    Why would a vaccine injury support program need infusion of $36 million taxpayer dollars for what has been described as essentially a NON-ISSUE, that no one cares about, and no one is allowed to talk about?

     

    Incidentally, when someone CAN get a payout from the VISP, the payouts are quite small and do not cover the costs incurred by the injured and certainly do not compensate for a death. 

    The 2 I know of who did receive a payout, received less than $200,000 for a permanent disability, so to budget $36 million seems like they are preparing for more or bigger payouts.

    There is a Canadian father whose 17 year old son died shortly after the jabs, who refused the meager payout offered because it included a cause that he had to STFU about it all and is suing the gov't and Pfizer - Dan Hartman.

    Will be interesting to see where that goes.

  10. For an injection that is "100% safe and 95% effective", the government is sure shelling out a lot for vax injuries in this budget:  $36 million.  $19 million for this year and $17 million for next year.

    By the end of 2022, the program had paid out $2.8 million.

    One year later, it had paid out $11.2 million.

    Quite an exponential increase for vax injury funding.  Seems like what the gov't is saying and where they are putting their money, isn't quite aligning.

    Why would a vaccine injury support program need infusion of $36 million taxpayer dollars for what has been described as essentially a NON-ISSUE, that no one cares about, and no one is allowed to talk about?

     

  11. 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

    You might as well yell that at clouds. He didn't take in 1% of what you wrote. 

    I don't think he's able to assimilate new information.

    He's still spewing long debunked propaganda from the beginning of covid.

    Either he's being deliberately deceptive or is truly so mentally deficient that he cannot comprehend anything new.

    • Like 1
  12. 2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

    Spread by word of mouth?

    Speaking of milk is it safe to assume this protein you mentioned would make breastfeeding especially dangerous?

    Spike protein (which we know is the most toxic part of the virus) has been found in breastmilk, yes.

    There was a recent study that it was causing gastro-bleeding in infants.

    This is why medical ethics usually don't force pregnant women to take experimental drugs.

    At the time the jabs were forced on everyone, there was of course - no long-term studies.  

    Fun experiment, eh?

  13. 16 minutes ago, eyeball said:

     

    But it's actually come to the point where you people now shun the vaccinated?

    There are sites now for unvaxxed dating.

    Conversely, on some of the dating sites, people will openly say they won't date an unvaxxed person.

    **shrugs**

    That's what I've been told anyways - I'm not on the dating sites.

    Met my man the old fashioned way.

  14. Six new academic papers have been published linking covid mRNA vaccines to cancer in just the last 2 weeks, bringing the running total now to twenty-six.

    Here’s a list of the six new papers:

    • (2024 April, Zhang and El-Deiry) - SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells.

    • (2024 April, Rubio-Casillas et al) - Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?

    • (2024 April, Gibo et al) - Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.

    • (2024 April, Abdurrahman et al) - Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine.

    • (2024 April, Ueda et al) - Fetal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case.

    • (2024 April, Gentilini et al) - A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty®: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature.

    Of course, these cancer papers follow a long, significant trend of papers — thousands now — linking injuries apart from myocarditis to the jabs.

    Yet the  CDC and the FDA still only recognize myocarditis/pericarditis as legitimate covid vaccine injuries.

  15. 3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

    I don't know anyone personally who admits that they're still getting jabbed. 

    A couple months ago, I heard my neighbours (who are lovely people and great neighbours) talking outside about which 4th booster they were going to get - Moderna or Pfizer.

    What can you do with these ones?  Shrug and sigh.

  16. 10 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

    Rest assured it's not because all the Facebook Karens who did their own research convinced them via quackery. 

    I've shown many of my friends the studies and datasets, no quackery.

    Lots of them have come to ME, now that they recognize the giant mind-fu*k that went on the last few years and told me "you were right."

  17. 1 minute ago, eyeball said:

    I hear you, I'm definitely looking forward to tax breaks and way less red-tape. I miss the old school days when I could haul logs home from the National Park and sell them under the table.

    Has Poilievre said anything about how big a tax refund I can expect or how much guvmint he'll keep off my back?

    Gah.

    If only you had asked these questions of Trudeau before becoming such a super fan of woke.

    Polievre has said repeatedly he would reduce gov't size and control.

    Who knows?

    Maybe he's a secret totalitarian dictator, like the Turd turned out to be.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...